<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joseph Kosinksi in Talks to Direct The Twilight Zone Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2013/08/16/joseph-kosinksi-in-talks-to-direct-the-twilight-zone-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/08/16/joseph-kosinksi-in-talks-to-direct-the-twilight-zone-movie/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrespony</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/08/16/joseph-kosinksi-in-talks-to-direct-the-twilight-zone-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-6931300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrespony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=99310#comment-6931300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the previous commenter, this is another way for Hollywood to play it safe, using what they think is a marketable brand to move product. Kosinski&#039;s Oblivion was really pretty good, I&#039;ll be interested in whatever he works on next.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the previous commenter, this is another way for Hollywood to play it safe, using what they think is a marketable brand to move product. Kosinski&#8217;s Oblivion was really pretty good, I&#8217;ll be interested in whatever he works on next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Heilman</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/08/16/joseph-kosinksi-in-talks-to-direct-the-twilight-zone-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-6931247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T. Heilman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=99310#comment-6931247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t this just a case of a company sticking a trademarked, universally known title onto what is essentially an unrelated &quot;sci-fi action&quot; film? Twilight Zone was Rod Serling, Richard Matheson, Charles Beaumont and a few other key collaborators, All these gentlemen are deceased and the zeitgeist that it enjoyed is long gone. The attempts to resurrect the show were either interesting failures (the &#039;83 film) or were just plain awful (the subsequent  Eighties t.v. reboot and the Forest Whittaker hosted series). And who is the audience for this? Are the moviegoing youth clamoring for it? Just call it something else dammit. If it can&#039;t stand on the basis of its own premise then forget it. This fine show has suffered enough indignities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this just a case of a company sticking a trademarked, universally known title onto what is essentially an unrelated &#8220;sci-fi action&#8221; film? Twilight Zone was Rod Serling, Richard Matheson, Charles Beaumont and a few other key collaborators, All these gentlemen are deceased and the zeitgeist that it enjoyed is long gone. The attempts to resurrect the show were either interesting failures (the &#8217;83 film) or were just plain awful (the subsequent  Eighties t.v. reboot and the Forest Whittaker hosted series). And who is the audience for this? Are the moviegoing youth clamoring for it? Just call it something else dammit. If it can&#8217;t stand on the basis of its own premise then forget it. This fine show has suffered enough indignities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>