<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neill Blomkamp&#8217;s Elysium Trailer Starring Matt Damon and Jodie Foster</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Menthe</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6673376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[La Menthe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6673376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big sci-films being released this year (although many of them already reek of mediocrity/crappiness):

Elysium

After Earth

Pacific Rim

Ender&#039;s Game

Oblivion

The Prototype

Gravity

Star Trek Into Darkness

Riddick

The most exciting ones are Star Trek Into Darkness, Elysium and Gravity . I&#039;m mostly excited for Gravity, where we will see the return of Alfonso Cuaron since the amazing Children of Men -- which, incidentally, had a huge influence on Blomkamp&#039;s District 9 (and possibly also Elysium). 

It&#039;s great to see the return of sci-fi films. It&#039;s all due to the successes of sci-fi films in 2009 (primarily Avatar, Star-Trek, District 9) that we see this reemergence. If we&#039;re lucky, the anticipated successes of these film will set the motion for more sci-fi films the next 4-5 years (although Cameron&#039;s Avatar-trilogy will carry a lot of this weight by itself, the way it has done it with the popularity of 3D-filmmaking).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big sci-films being released this year (although many of them already reek of mediocrity/crappiness):</p>
<p>Elysium</p>
<p>After Earth</p>
<p>Pacific Rim</p>
<p>Ender&#8217;s Game</p>
<p>Oblivion</p>
<p>The Prototype</p>
<p>Gravity</p>
<p>Star Trek Into Darkness</p>
<p>Riddick</p>
<p>The most exciting ones are Star Trek Into Darkness, Elysium and Gravity . I&#8217;m mostly excited for Gravity, where we will see the return of Alfonso Cuaron since the amazing Children of Men &#8212; which, incidentally, had a huge influence on Blomkamp&#8217;s District 9 (and possibly also Elysium). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see the return of sci-fi films. It&#8217;s all due to the successes of sci-fi films in 2009 (primarily Avatar, Star-Trek, District 9) that we see this reemergence. If we&#8217;re lucky, the anticipated successes of these film will set the motion for more sci-fi films the next 4-5 years (although Cameron&#8217;s Avatar-trilogy will carry a lot of this weight by itself, the way it has done it with the popularity of 3D-filmmaking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Menthe</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6673265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[La Menthe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6673265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Maopheus, AK-47 (or an upgraded version of it, which we still are seeing being produced, the latest one being the AK-107) isn&#039;t the most used rifle in the world without a reason.

Richard Venola, an editor of Combat Arms, noted this about the gun: &quot;If I had to go to an unknown planet and I was allowed to bring one firearm, it would be an AK-47....When western civilization breaks down, I want an Ak-47.&quot; 

It&#039;s popular for being extremely cheap and reliable. You could drive over it with a tank, bury it in sand and mud, abuse it to a degree that it is covered in rust, and it will still work -- whereas other guns don&#039;t have this quality. It is also the simplest gun to clean, and is in addition, because of its simplicity, easy to train soldiers with. A soldier can be taught to take care, field-strip and clean a Kalashnikov in a few hours. The M-16 is going to take a week.

I personally believe it will be around for about 300 years after its first use in 1947, and I don&#039;t believe that to be an exaggeration. You still see shepherds and insurgents in every parts of the world,  like Afghanistan, use a lot of old 19th century rifles from the old British Army with effectiveness against American soldiers. Why should it be any different with the AK-47, an even more versatile, solid and popular gun?

And If I&#039;m not mistaken, the modified AK-47 in the trailer is the &quot;lower-class&quot; weapon, and probably the gun that is used by the underprivileged society down on earth, compared to the other high-tech weaponry we see on the trailer. The society that Damon&#039;s character stems from is in the shape of, and maybe even worse than, today&#039;s third world countries. The AK-47, with a touch of futuristic modification, makes perfect sense in a setting like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Maopheus, AK-47 (or an upgraded version of it, which we still are seeing being produced, the latest one being the AK-107) isn&#8217;t the most used rifle in the world without a reason.</p>
<p>Richard Venola, an editor of Combat Arms, noted this about the gun: &#8220;If I had to go to an unknown planet and I was allowed to bring one firearm, it would be an AK-47&#8230;.When western civilization breaks down, I want an Ak-47.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s popular for being extremely cheap and reliable. You could drive over it with a tank, bury it in sand and mud, abuse it to a degree that it is covered in rust, and it will still work &#8212; whereas other guns don&#8217;t have this quality. It is also the simplest gun to clean, and is in addition, because of its simplicity, easy to train soldiers with. A soldier can be taught to take care, field-strip and clean a Kalashnikov in a few hours. The M-16 is going to take a week.</p>
<p>I personally believe it will be around for about 300 years after its first use in 1947, and I don&#8217;t believe that to be an exaggeration. You still see shepherds and insurgents in every parts of the world,  like Afghanistan, use a lot of old 19th century rifles from the old British Army with effectiveness against American soldiers. Why should it be any different with the AK-47, an even more versatile, solid and popular gun?</p>
<p>And If I&#8217;m not mistaken, the modified AK-47 in the trailer is the &#8220;lower-class&#8221; weapon, and probably the gun that is used by the underprivileged society down on earth, compared to the other high-tech weaponry we see on the trailer. The society that Damon&#8217;s character stems from is in the shape of, and maybe even worse than, today&#8217;s third world countries. The AK-47, with a touch of futuristic modification, makes perfect sense in a setting like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony D'Amico</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6671491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony D'Amico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 03:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6671491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That looked pretty fucking awesome, I&#039;m definitely stoked for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looked pretty fucking awesome, I&#8217;m definitely stoked for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6669115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6669115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and dont forget del toro sci-fi thingy. this is going to be awesome summer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and dont forget del toro sci-fi thingy. this is going to be awesome summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanh</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6665626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ryanh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6665626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sci-fi is due a resurgence, I hope.

Think looks like a good place to start things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sci-fi is due a resurgence, I hope.</p>
<p>Think looks like a good place to start things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darksiders</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6664083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darksiders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6664083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have Oblivion and then Elysium in the same summer. This is going to be great for sci-fi.

@Brian - also thought of Iron Man when I saw this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have Oblivion and then Elysium in the same summer. This is going to be great for sci-fi.</p>
<p>@Brian &#8211; also thought of Iron Man when I saw this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kasan</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6663077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Kasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6663077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like how some of the tech used is both sleek and junk-made/put together. Blomkamp really does know what makes really good sci-fi when it comes to the technology used. 

Watching this felt like I was watching a videogame cut-scene. Elysium reminded me of the Halo ring. ON BOARD the Elysium train ticket please!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how some of the tech used is both sleek and junk-made/put together. Blomkamp really does know what makes really good sci-fi when it comes to the technology used. </p>
<p>Watching this felt like I was watching a videogame cut-scene. Elysium reminded me of the Halo ring. ON BOARD the Elysium train ticket please!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maopheus</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6662979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maopheus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6662979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s nice to see that Blomkamp, with an increased budget, still has that eye to making everything seem very real and organic. Just like with D9, it&#039;s very hard to tell what is CG and what is not, and isn&#039;t that the point? Although I do have to say that it seems a little odd that Damon would be using some kind of modified AK-47. It&#039;s 2154 and somehow AK-47&#039;s have survived over 200 years? It&#039;s either a testament to the longevity of the AK or maybe the prop guy just needed something to use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see that Blomkamp, with an increased budget, still has that eye to making everything seem very real and organic. Just like with D9, it&#8217;s very hard to tell what is CG and what is not, and isn&#8217;t that the point? Although I do have to say that it seems a little odd that Damon would be using some kind of modified AK-47. It&#8217;s 2154 and somehow AK-47&#8217;s have survived over 200 years? It&#8217;s either a testament to the longevity of the AK or maybe the prop guy just needed something to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyri</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6662523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kyri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6662523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agh.. why did they have to cast Judie Foster in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agh.. why did they have to cast Judie Foster in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6661279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6661279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe I&#039;m becoming an old fart of late as most trailers don&#039;t really get me pumped....but this? I just started dancing! The look of the two opposing life styles look fantastic, the cast  is great and to top it all  mr blomkamp will undoubtedly make an intelligent sci fi with the added bonus of exciting accessible blockbuster. 

See y&#039;all at the movies;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m becoming an old fart of late as most trailers don&#8217;t really get me pumped&#8230;.but this? I just started dancing! The look of the two opposing life styles look fantastic, the cast  is great and to top it all  mr blomkamp will undoubtedly make an intelligent sci fi with the added bonus of exciting accessible blockbuster. </p>
<p>See y&#8217;all at the movies;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLCGS</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6660354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MLCGS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6660354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[District 9 was awesome, and I am definitely looking forward to see what Blomkamp does with more money to work with. One of my most anticipated movies this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>District 9 was awesome, and I am definitely looking forward to see what Blomkamp does with more money to work with. One of my most anticipated movies this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasper</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2013/04/09/neill-blomkamps-elysium-trailer-starring-matt-damon-and-jodie-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-6659208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=93146#comment-6659208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got a massive hard on right now. Also the trailer was pretty good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a massive hard on right now. Also the trailer was pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>