<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Sequel in the Works</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-6209966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=87997#comment-6209966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Were you commenting while drinking, La Menthe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you commenting while drinking, La Menthe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Menthe</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-6195001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[La Menthe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=87997#comment-6195001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with the parts that didn&#039;t need CGI at all -- this upset me mainly because I hate the use of CGI in films in general. I noticed how some of del Toro&#039;s touch was noticeable in the creative art in this film (like the awesome messenger orc that had a wheel, as part of his body, stuck to a line of rope as a way of transport). The extensive use of CGI, however, is what saddened me about his departure; I&#039;m pretty sure he would have forced make-up upon a large number of the creatures (such as the villain orc, and almost all orcs in general) if he had stayed. 

Some CGI-scenes were awful to watch too. The most noticeable was the retelling of Erebor and Smaug&#039;s invasion, and the ending with Smaug hiding in the gold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the parts that didn&#8217;t need CGI at all &#8212; this upset me mainly because I hate the use of CGI in films in general. I noticed how some of del Toro&#8217;s touch was noticeable in the creative art in this film (like the awesome messenger orc that had a wheel, as part of his body, stuck to a line of rope as a way of transport). The extensive use of CGI, however, is what saddened me about his departure; I&#8217;m pretty sure he would have forced make-up upon a large number of the creatures (such as the villain orc, and almost all orcs in general) if he had stayed. </p>
<p>Some CGI-scenes were awful to watch too. The most noticeable was the retelling of Erebor and Smaug&#8217;s invasion, and the ending with Smaug hiding in the gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Andrews</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-6189536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=87997#comment-6189536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biggest disappointments ? Amazing film. You should try the Sir Alec Guiness TV series and then revisit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biggest disappointments ? Amazing film. You should try the Sir Alec Guiness TV series and then revisit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Menthe</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-6185103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[La Menthe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=87997#comment-6185103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another chance*

Damn you edit button; where are you hiding?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another chance*</p>
<p>Damn you edit button; where are you hiding?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Menthe</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-6185099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[La Menthe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=87997#comment-6185099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another change*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another change*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Menthe</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/12/13/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-sequel-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-6184967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[La Menthe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=87997#comment-6184967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean, how could you call Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy a disappointment? It was a great spy thriller! It captured the atmosphere of classic vintage films amazingly. Whereas other period pieces often are pretty straightforward, with the main focus on a visual setting from the time itself (fashion, music, architecture), this one actually manages to capture the essence of the old spy thrillers (which are indeed long and slow) pretty good.  Thomas Alfredson has purposely stripped Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy of suspense, modern fast-clipping and action scenes .

You should really give it another change. I myself liked it considerably more the second time, when I already knew the story and was able to focus on other elements of the films.  It&#039;s a really well directed film -- and is only short of, as mentioned, the modern entertainment elements, that Alfredson had deliberately removed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, how could you call Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy a disappointment? It was a great spy thriller! It captured the atmosphere of classic vintage films amazingly. Whereas other period pieces often are pretty straightforward, with the main focus on a visual setting from the time itself (fashion, music, architecture), this one actually manages to capture the essence of the old spy thrillers (which are indeed long and slow) pretty good.  Thomas Alfredson has purposely stripped Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy of suspense, modern fast-clipping and action scenes .</p>
<p>You should really give it another change. I myself liked it considerably more the second time, when I already knew the story and was able to focus on other elements of the films.  It&#8217;s a really well directed film &#8212; and is only short of, as mentioned, the modern entertainment elements, that Alfredson had deliberately removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>