Comments on: J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek 2 Gets an Official Title

By: freelivetvapk

freelivetvapk — Tue, 08 May 2018 01:06:00 +0000

Wow, nice article, thanks for sharing. Also, you can check this official link for latest movie and tv apps https://liveiptvapks.com/.

By: chiru megastar

chiru megastar — Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:37:00 +0000

Mobdro for iOS, iPhone is the best app available for ios users mobdro ios

By: MovieBox

MovieBox — Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:42:00 +0000

You have written such an appreciable post moviebox apk thank you so much for sharing this information with all of us.

By: PlanBFromOuterSpace

PlanBFromOuterSpace — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:00:49 +0000

Has anyone EVER stayed away from a film in a popular series or REALLY worried about the quality because of the title? It’s one of those things that people bitch and bitch and bitch about, but it has no bearing on the film itself whatsoever. People will talk about it, stirring up some free publicity, but the questionable title won’t keep people away. Exhibit A: The Star Wars prequels. Based on the complaining about the titles of the first two installments, the third one could have been called “Star Wars Episode III: I’m George Lucas, and I Hate You All, But You’re Going to Eat This Shit Up Anyway”, and while a little cumbersome (not to mention difficult to fit on the marquee), it would have made just as much money.

At my theater, when people come up to buy a ticket for something, they’ll usually just say “Twilight” or “Harry Potter” or “Bourne” or whatever. Sequels to known popular franchises don’t even need to have subtitles or numbers after them, because they largely go ignored by the general moviegoing public anyway. With the way that the new “Star Trek” hit, you can just throw the cast or the Enterprise on the poster to the sequel WITHOUT a title and they’ll just get it.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:01:13 +0000

That’s a great link you posted, Spooksta. Didn’t realize that. The first film was a shit sandwich – here’s hoping this is much better. Judging by that awful title, I’m not getting my hopes up…

By: Owozifa

Owozifa — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:44:36 +0000

I’m not really that fond of the first movie either. I just never got invested in it so it ended up being rather boring and nonsensical to me. I kinda gave it more credit at first because lots of people did seem to like it, but when I passed up the Blu-ray at Walmart for $5 I knew my gut feeling was more down on it than I thought.

I’ll go see the second one and hope.

By: PlanBFromOuterSpace

PlanBFromOuterSpace — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:40:14 +0000

@Beerdude — Well played, sir. Well played.

By: Beerdude

Beerdude — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:01:34 +0000

The title is a pun on the forced release in 3D

By: Spooksta

Spooksta — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:43:45 +0000

http://www.slashfilm.com/the-writers-strikes-impact-on-jj-abrams-star-trek/

“Damon described it like having one of your superpowers taken away.”

By: Spooksta

Spooksta — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:33:46 +0000

Some people do not realise the 1s film was soured by a writers strike. It certainly effected the final product in my view, namely the 2nd half of the film. I have high high hopes for this one.!

By: PlanBFromOuterSpace

PlanBFromOuterSpace — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:42:02 +0000

How about “Star 2rek”? Maybe that’s too subtle. “$tar Trek”? Based on the reception on the first one, if they were going attempt something without the Star Trek name in it at all, they could have called it *CashRegisterSound*

By: 1138sw

1138sw — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:03:22 +0000

@La Menthe

Sorry just felt like it was poor film making. The casting was fine, but the humor was juvenile, plot holes galore, horrible dialogue and production design that was just god awful…a beer brewery doubling as the engine room? Blech!

Overall there were just too many creative choices that JJ made that I just didn’t like…

I am one of the few that loves remakes and I know that there have been some really bad ones…well this was a bad one in my opinion.