J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek 2 Gets an Official Title

As with most J.J. Abrams productions, details surrounding the upcoming Star Trek sequel have been pretty hard to come by thus far. We know that Benedict Cumberbatch is the film’s villain and various sources have insisted that he will be playing Khan, but still nothing has been confirmed as of yet. The plot remains a closely guarded secret despite the fact that production supposedly wrapped months ago. Now this week we may have our first hint at what is to come in the form of a title. If the reports are to be believed, it sounds like the upcoming sequel will actually be called Star Trek Into Darkness.

The news originally broke via Coming Soon, who received a scoop that Paramount had recently registered the domain names www.startrekintodarkness.com and www.startrekintodarknessmovie.com. TrekMovie has since confirmed with multiple sources that this is indeed the title they have decided on. Clearly studios need to find a more secretive way to register their domain names.

Paramount supposedly spent the summer testing various possible titles with audiences, including at least one that did not include the phrase Star Trek at all. The one that they have settled on is interesting because it avoids the numbering system use by the original Star Trek films and the use of a colon like the Star Trek: The Next Generation movies. Of course, that being said, the title actually tells us very little, but I suppose the important thing is that it really doesn’t sound like a Star Trek title at all. Perhaps this is just their way of telling us the sequel will have less lens flares. What do you think of the title Star Trek Into Darkness?



  • projectgenesis

    Love it. Can’t wait for Treknobabble 2.0

  • patrik

    Maybe it’s time for me to break out the first movie again. It’s been a while and I’m very much looking forward to this, especially to see Cumberbatchs’ performance

  • 1138sw

    I hope JJ does better than the first movie which was just plain bad…blech! I’ve tried re-watching the first Trek and I still cannot like this movie! Bad P. Desgin, bad script…like I said I hope the second one is better especially with Cumberpatch involved. He is so awesome at sherlock!

  • Spooksta

    Love it

  • Maopheus

    If you didn’t like the first one, I doubt you’d like the new one. I think you have to actually look at the title as a phrase. It’s a “star trek into darkness”. A journey, in other words, that takes the crew and other characters to perhaps a place or places they did not anticipate or wish.

  • La Menthe

    @1138sw, are you joking with me? Star Trek is one of the few blockbuster the last few years that actually was fun and entertaining to watch.

  • 1138sw

    @La Menthe

    Sorry just felt like it was poor film making. The casting was fine, but the humor was juvenile, plot holes galore, horrible dialogue and production design that was just god awful…a beer brewery doubling as the engine room? Blech!

    Overall there were just too many creative choices that JJ made that I just didn’t like…

    I am one of the few that loves remakes and I know that there have been some really bad ones…well this was a bad one in my opinion.

  • How about “Star 2rek”? Maybe that’s too subtle. “$tar Trek”? Based on the reception on the first one, if they were going attempt something without the Star Trek name in it at all, they could have called it *CashRegisterSound*

  • Spooksta

    Some people do not realise the 1s film was soured by a writers strike. It certainly effected the final product in my view, namely the 2nd half of the film. I have high high hopes for this one.!

  • Spooksta

    http://www.slashfilm.com/the-writers-strikes-impact-on-jj-abrams-star-trek/

    “Damon described it like having one of your superpowers taken away.”

  • Beerdude

    The title is a pun on the forced release in 3D

  • @Beerdude — Well played, sir. Well played.

  • Owozifa

    I’m not really that fond of the first movie either. I just never got invested in it so it ended up being rather boring and nonsensical to me. I kinda gave it more credit at first because lots of people did seem to like it, but when I passed up the Blu-ray at Walmart for $5 I knew my gut feeling was more down on it than I thought.

    I’ll go see the second one and hope.

  • Bryan

    That’s a great link you posted, Spooksta. Didn’t realize that. The first film was a shit sandwich – here’s hoping this is much better. Judging by that awful title, I’m not getting my hopes up…

  • Has anyone EVER stayed away from a film in a popular series or REALLY worried about the quality because of the title? It’s one of those things that people bitch and bitch and bitch about, but it has no bearing on the film itself whatsoever. People will talk about it, stirring up some free publicity, but the questionable title won’t keep people away. Exhibit A: The Star Wars prequels. Based on the complaining about the titles of the first two installments, the third one could have been called “Star Wars Episode III: I’m George Lucas, and I Hate You All, But You’re Going to Eat This Shit Up Anyway”, and while a little cumbersome (not to mention difficult to fit on the marquee), it would have made just as much money.

    At my theater, when people come up to buy a ticket for something, they’ll usually just say “Twilight” or “Harry Potter” or “Bourne” or whatever. Sequels to known popular franchises don’t even need to have subtitles or numbers after them, because they largely go ignored by the general moviegoing public anyway. With the way that the new “Star Trek” hit, you can just throw the cast or the Enterprise on the poster to the sequel WITHOUT a title and they’ll just get it.

  • You have written such an appreciable post moviebox apk thank you so much for sharing this information with all of us.

  • chiru megastar

    Mobdro for iOS, iPhone is the best app available for ios users
    mobdro ios

  • Wow, nice article, thanks for sharing. Also, you can check this official link for latest movie and tv apps https://liveiptvapks.com/.