<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peter Jackson Defends the Decision to Shoot The Hobbit at 48 fps</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordAwesome</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5197598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LordAwesome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5197598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No really news.  I mean he was hardly going to come out and say &quot;Shit, I was wrong and completely screwed up this movie&quot;.  Of course he&#039;s going to defend it even if he is completely wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No really news.  I mean he was hardly going to come out and say &#8220;Shit, I was wrong and completely screwed up this movie&#8221;.  Of course he&#8217;s going to defend it even if he is completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Gamble</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5187798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Gamble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 02:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5187798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Color correction is a potentially real issue with the unfinished product. Once you top 30fps colors can potentially start blurring together (single frames of black and white alternating would eventually become grey at a high enough rate). Thus their could be a real issue with the colors being muted pre-color correction.

Of course with higher frame rates you can also run into issues with judder on screen. It can be an issue with 50&quot; HDTV&#039;s, god knows how big of a problem it can be on a 50&#039; movie screen. You&#039;d have to use crap tons of motion blur to eliminate it which could lead to a softening and blurriness to the image. Though this hasn&#039;t been an issue with modern digital projectors, so I&#039;m hesitant to get too worried about it.

That all being said, judging 48fps on a 10 minute unfinished promo seems to be much ado about nothing IMO, especially I don&#039;t exactly trust the mass majority of those attending to discern what looks good and what doesn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Color correction is a potentially real issue with the unfinished product. Once you top 30fps colors can potentially start blurring together (single frames of black and white alternating would eventually become grey at a high enough rate). Thus their could be a real issue with the colors being muted pre-color correction.</p>
<p>Of course with higher frame rates you can also run into issues with judder on screen. It can be an issue with 50&#8243; HDTV&#8217;s, god knows how big of a problem it can be on a 50&#8242; movie screen. You&#8217;d have to use crap tons of motion blur to eliminate it which could lead to a softening and blurriness to the image. Though this hasn&#8217;t been an issue with modern digital projectors, so I&#8217;m hesitant to get too worried about it.</p>
<p>That all being said, judging 48fps on a 10 minute unfinished promo seems to be much ado about nothing IMO, especially I don&#8217;t exactly trust the mass majority of those attending to discern what looks good and what doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rus in chicago</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5187291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rus in chicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5187291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think you guys really understand the issue.  This isn&#039;t about technology and when/where it should enter the public.  It&#039;s about how the eye sees, projected image, the way the mind interprets said images, comfort, and the &quot;forgiveness&quot; of the frame rate.  The Hobbit has as many practical effects as computer.  More frame rate and loss of the inherent &quot;forgiveness&quot; from 24f could be a real problem.  We need to &quot;suspense disbelief&quot; to enter the world of The Hobbit - why would you increase frame rate to make the images more in-tune if the real world?!  Its a decision catering to the computer work flow not the audience.  Reports say the lushness is gone and the higher frame rate makes you feel like you ARE PART OF A documentary on the making of The Hobbit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you guys really understand the issue.  This isn&#8217;t about technology and when/where it should enter the public.  It&#8217;s about how the eye sees, projected image, the way the mind interprets said images, comfort, and the &#8220;forgiveness&#8221; of the frame rate.  The Hobbit has as many practical effects as computer.  More frame rate and loss of the inherent &#8220;forgiveness&#8221; from 24f could be a real problem.  We need to &#8220;suspense disbelief&#8221; to enter the world of The Hobbit &#8211; why would you increase frame rate to make the images more in-tune if the real world?!  Its a decision catering to the computer work flow not the audience.  Reports say the lushness is gone and the higher frame rate makes you feel like you ARE PART OF A documentary on the making of The Hobbit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5186345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brooke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5186345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We handled the shaky craze of Cloverfield and the found footage style films. I can&#039;t imagine anything that would be more difficult to watch. So I&#039;m sure we can handle doubling the frame rate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We handled the shaky craze of Cloverfield and the found footage style films. I can&#8217;t imagine anything that would be more difficult to watch. So I&#8217;m sure we can handle doubling the frame rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flixchic</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5186303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flixchic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5186303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you ask me, the technological bells and whistles will only ever be a temporary fix; ultimately it is the quality of the movies themselves that matters.&quot;

We don’t want to take the risk with a movie we’ve been looking forward to for a long time. Tried and true will always be the safest route. 

On the other hand, a safe life is not as exciting or fulfilling. Filmmakers need to take these risks to fulfill their own needs for creative achievement. This doesn&#039;t scare me in the slightest. This is how progress is made. I&#039;ve always been curious where the human mind will take technology. I can&#039;t wait to see The Hobbit and how 48fps will look. I trust that the professionals that make movie magic happen will do just that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you ask me, the technological bells and whistles will only ever be a temporary fix; ultimately it is the quality of the movies themselves that matters.&#8221;</p>
<p>We don’t want to take the risk with a movie we’ve been looking forward to for a long time. Tried and true will always be the safest route. </p>
<p>On the other hand, a safe life is not as exciting or fulfilling. Filmmakers need to take these risks to fulfill their own needs for creative achievement. This doesn&#8217;t scare me in the slightest. This is how progress is made. I&#8217;ve always been curious where the human mind will take technology. I can&#8217;t wait to see The Hobbit and how 48fps will look. I trust that the professionals that make movie magic happen will do just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5186163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5186163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that if there were ever a film to introduce new technology like this, it would have to be a &quot;Lord of the Rings&quot; film, because these are some of the best &quot;fantasy&quot; films ever.  Based on the amount of money those films made and the fanbase for them, it would be difficult, if not impossible, for people to forgo seeing one of the films because of a change in the way the movie was filmed.

If the Hobbit films are only shown at 48 fps, odds are that the majority of people that go out and see the films won&#039;t have a clue about the 48 fps until afterward.  If it&#039;s a positive thing and actually adds to the experience, there will be a lot of buzz about it.  People will be commenting that the film looked &quot;different&quot; and they&#039;ll be wondering what the change was and that will build publicity for the new technology.

If it takes more of an adjustment then Jackson thinks, to get used to the 48 fps, but the film, in and of itself, is still awesome and engrossing, the backlash probably won&#039;t be as bad as it would be if the 48 fps were being introduced in any other film.

The point is, unless it&#039;s completely unwatchable, I don&#039;t think there are many people that will refuse to watch the film solely because it&#039;s filmed in a new way.

As a Peter Jackson fan, if someone told me that the film was only going to be released in black and white, I would still be half tempted to show up on opening day and see it, that is the draw of these films.  That&#039;s why if there&#039;s a time to introduce a new filming method, that is the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if there were ever a film to introduce new technology like this, it would have to be a &#8220;Lord of the Rings&#8221; film, because these are some of the best &#8220;fantasy&#8221; films ever.  Based on the amount of money those films made and the fanbase for them, it would be difficult, if not impossible, for people to forgo seeing one of the films because of a change in the way the movie was filmed.</p>
<p>If the Hobbit films are only shown at 48 fps, odds are that the majority of people that go out and see the films won&#8217;t have a clue about the 48 fps until afterward.  If it&#8217;s a positive thing and actually adds to the experience, there will be a lot of buzz about it.  People will be commenting that the film looked &#8220;different&#8221; and they&#8217;ll be wondering what the change was and that will build publicity for the new technology.</p>
<p>If it takes more of an adjustment then Jackson thinks, to get used to the 48 fps, but the film, in and of itself, is still awesome and engrossing, the backlash probably won&#8217;t be as bad as it would be if the 48 fps were being introduced in any other film.</p>
<p>The point is, unless it&#8217;s completely unwatchable, I don&#8217;t think there are many people that will refuse to watch the film solely because it&#8217;s filmed in a new way.</p>
<p>As a Peter Jackson fan, if someone told me that the film was only going to be released in black and white, I would still be half tempted to show up on opening day and see it, that is the draw of these films.  That&#8217;s why if there&#8217;s a time to introduce a new filming method, that is the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swivel</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5186007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5186007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody please calm down. There would be a 24fps release too. Just dont go to watch the 3D-48fps... let it for meeee!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody please calm down. There would be a 24fps release too. Just dont go to watch the 3D-48fps&#8230; let it for meeee!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maopheus</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5185741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maopheus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5185741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like Jackson and Nolan might have a little argument as to why keep pushing cinematic technology forward just for the sake of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Jackson and Nolan might have a little argument as to why keep pushing cinematic technology forward just for the sake of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rus in chicago</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/04/30/peter-jackson-defends-the-decision-to-shoot-the-hobbit-at-48-fps/comment-page-1/#comment-5185619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rus in chicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=75758#comment-5185619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;every film, but I am still unclear why he thinks it is appropriate for The Hobbit.&quot; exactly!  I don&#039;t understand either...it is only an advantage for the special effects but I hear this is making practical effects like MAKEUP a nightmare.

either way - misjudging the reaction to released footage,or, picking the wrong workflow in the first place - this is a major misstep from the largest current franchise in production at this time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;every film, but I am still unclear why he thinks it is appropriate for The Hobbit.&#8221; exactly!  I don&#8217;t understand either&#8230;it is only an advantage for the special effects but I hear this is making practical effects like MAKEUP a nightmare.</p>
<p>either way &#8211; misjudging the reaction to released footage,or, picking the wrong workflow in the first place &#8211; this is a major misstep from the largest current franchise in production at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>