<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Hawkes Signs on for Jackie Brown Prequel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2012/02/02/john-hawkes-signs-on-for-jackie-brown-prequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/02/02/john-hawkes-signs-on-for-jackie-brown-prequel/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benn</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/02/02/john-hawkes-signs-on-for-jackie-brown-prequel/comment-page-1/#comment-4598416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=70542#comment-4598416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story of a young ordell would be incredibly entertaining, but just as a lot of people have already said; without Tarantino means it doesn&#039;t have much going for it :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story of a young ordell would be incredibly entertaining, but just as a lot of people have already said; without Tarantino means it doesn&#8217;t have much going for it <img src="https://filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom G</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/02/02/john-hawkes-signs-on-for-jackie-brown-prequel/comment-page-1/#comment-4577280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dom G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=70542#comment-4577280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this point of his career, I&#039;d say it is a good sign]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point of his career, I&#8217;d say it is a good sign</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csidle</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/02/02/john-hawkes-signs-on-for-jackie-brown-prequel/comment-page-1/#comment-4576331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[csidle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=70542#comment-4576331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;ll definitely watch it for Hawkes - he&#039;s one of the best - but no Tarantino is no good sign.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ll definitely watch it for Hawkes &#8211; he&#8217;s one of the best &#8211; but no Tarantino is no good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrik</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/02/02/john-hawkes-signs-on-for-jackie-brown-prequel/comment-page-1/#comment-4576209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patrik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=70542#comment-4576209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love John Hawkes but without Tarantino involved in any way, I don&#039;t really wanna see this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love John Hawkes but without Tarantino involved in any way, I don&#8217;t really wanna see this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>