<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Junk Podcast Episode #354: Haywire</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4582575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4582575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer 5 stars but it isn&#039;t a deal breaker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer 5 stars but it isn&#8217;t a deal breaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4581510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4581510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[5 stars is the way to go.

1 star  - horrible
2 stars - not good; below average
3 stars - solid; average
4 stars - really good: above average
5 stars - exceptional; amazing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 stars is the way to go.</p>
<p>1 star  &#8211; horrible<br />
2 stars &#8211; not good; below average<br />
3 stars &#8211; solid; average<br />
4 stars &#8211; really good: above average<br />
5 stars &#8211; exceptional; amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milath</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4527146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4527146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Andrew 

I wasn&#039;t going to comment anymore, but since you&#039;re asking directly, I&#039;ll go ahead and answer. 

Short answer: For FJ purposes, no I wasn&#039;t serious. 

That doesn&#039;t mean I think it&#039;s impossible to use a large point system, of course. IMDB uses one. You vote on 1-10 but it becomes 1.0 to 10.0 (essentially 10-100) when averaged out. There have been other sites I&#039;ve been on that asked for movie ratings 0-100 straight up as well. Though at that point of course it becomes more like ranking and less like rating. For FJ&#039;s use, of course, it would be overkill.

I do wonder if they change though if they are planning to go back through their previously rated films and re-rate them to give people a sense of what a 5 star vs a 4 star film would be. Or which movies would move from 2 star to 3 star. Because without doing so how can I easily see they preferred, say, something they gave 4 stars prior to changing over something they give 4 stars now? *shrug*

Anyway, as I said previously, I really don&#039;t care if they keep 4 star or go 5 star or whatever numerical system they choose to rate films. I&#039;m here for the discussion. I was just having a bit of fun with my overly defensive defense of the 4 star rating system. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew </p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to comment anymore, but since you&#8217;re asking directly, I&#8217;ll go ahead and answer. </p>
<p>Short answer: For FJ purposes, no I wasn&#8217;t serious. </p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean I think it&#8217;s impossible to use a large point system, of course. IMDB uses one. You vote on 1-10 but it becomes 1.0 to 10.0 (essentially 10-100) when averaged out. There have been other sites I&#8217;ve been on that asked for movie ratings 0-100 straight up as well. Though at that point of course it becomes more like ranking and less like rating. For FJ&#8217;s use, of course, it would be overkill.</p>
<p>I do wonder if they change though if they are planning to go back through their previously rated films and re-rate them to give people a sense of what a 5 star vs a 4 star film would be. Or which movies would move from 2 star to 3 star. Because without doing so how can I easily see they preferred, say, something they gave 4 stars prior to changing over something they give 4 stars now? *shrug*</p>
<p>Anyway, as I said previously, I really don&#8217;t care if they keep 4 star or go 5 star or whatever numerical system they choose to rate films. I&#8217;m here for the discussion. I was just having a bit of fun with my overly defensive defense of the 4 star rating system. <img src="https://filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4525558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4525558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@milath,

Out of curiosity, were you serious when you said you use a 100 point method?  How can that possibly be accurate?  What is the difference between a 46 and 47 rating (other than simply saying 47 is better)?

I think that&#039;s a bit much.

5 stars always rings so true to me very easily.  Usually the minute I walk out of a movie I know what to give a film based on the five point scale.  Trying to quantify on a four point scale just doesn&#039;t work for me.  I like to be more specific.  But not 100 specific.  That seems like overkill to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@milath,</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, were you serious when you said you use a 100 point method?  How can that possibly be accurate?  What is the difference between a 46 and 47 rating (other than simply saying 47 is better)?</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s a bit much.</p>
<p>5 stars always rings so true to me very easily.  Usually the minute I walk out of a movie I know what to give a film based on the five point scale.  Trying to quantify on a four point scale just doesn&#8217;t work for me.  I like to be more specific.  But not 100 specific.  That seems like overkill to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4525526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4525526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Milla Jovovich actually pronounce her name as yoh-v?-vich

http://youtu.be/uZwUuh0b4Jc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milla Jovovich actually pronounce her name as yoh-v?-vich</p>
<p><a href="http://youtu.be/uZwUuh0b4Jc" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/uZwUuh0b4Jc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4525155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4525155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Resident Evil is awesome, please leave it alone, nuff said  

:p]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resident Evil is awesome, please leave it alone, nuff said  </p>
<p>:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4524969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4524969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best rating in my opinion is neither 4 nor 10 stars but 6 Stars!

0- Absolute Shit
1- Shit
2- Weak
3- Mediocre
4- Good
5- Very Good
6- Excellent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best rating in my opinion is neither 4 nor 10 stars but 6 Stars!</p>
<p>0- Absolute Shit<br />
1- Shit<br />
2- Weak<br />
3- Mediocre<br />
4- Good<br />
5- Very Good<br />
6- Excellent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sly</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4524703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4524703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the only type of rating I need is:
  Worth Your Time / Avoid It]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only type of rating I need is:<br />
  Worth Your Time / Avoid It</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymiss</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4523900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4523900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fart on the breath of the dragon beast- frank]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fart on the breath of the dragon beast- frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falsk</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4523507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Falsk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4523507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. You really took that and ran, huh, Milath?

Honestly, I can&#039;t believe such an innocent statement/suggestion has brought up such passion on both sides. I never thought of the 4-star rating system to be something specifically &quot;Film Junk&quot;-y, especially since I always convert everyone&#039;s 4-stars to 5-stars in my head ANYWAY, with most good films being 4/4 and an exceptionally good film a, uh, 5/4?

I&#039;ve always been comfortable with a scale of five since I&#039;m pretty passionate about rating movies on my Netflix account (back when they had the &quot;friends&quot; section and you could compare what your friends watched/rated) so the five-points has always stuck...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. You really took that and ran, huh, Milath?</p>
<p>Honestly, I can&#8217;t believe such an innocent statement/suggestion has brought up such passion on both sides. I never thought of the 4-star rating system to be something specifically &#8220;Film Junk&#8221;-y, especially since I always convert everyone&#8217;s 4-stars to 5-stars in my head ANYWAY, with most good films being 4/4 and an exceptionally good film a, uh, 5/4?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been comfortable with a scale of five since I&#8217;m pretty passionate about rating movies on my Netflix account (back when they had the &#8220;friends&#8221; section and you could compare what your friends watched/rated) so the five-points has always stuck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjdelight</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4523096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjdelight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4523096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*use]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjdelight</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2012/01/24/film-junk-podcast-episode-354-haywire/comment-page-2/#comment-4523094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjdelight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=69928#comment-4523094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So many other sites you five stars, I don&#039;t understand why you would want to take away something makes filmjunk filmjunk. 354 episodes can&#039;t be wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many other sites you five stars, I don&#8217;t understand why you would want to take away something makes filmjunk filmjunk. 354 episodes can&#8217;t be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>