Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark Review

Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark
Directed by: Troy Nixey
Written by: Guillermo del Toro & Matthew Robbins
Starring: Katie Holmes, Guy Pearce, Bailee Madison, Jack Thompson

Horror is kind of like porn. Either it’s convincing and effective or it’s embarrassing and laughable. Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark is the latter, and there isn’t even any nudity. This haunted house of clichés shepherded by Guillermo del Toro brings nary a new idea to the table, and doesn’t even execute on old ones effectively. Chalk that up to first time feature director Troy Nixey, who does suspense about as well as Jenna Jameson does acting. And in the end, it’s the audience that gets screwed.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one. A family at odds moves into a charming old mansion with a (gasp!) terrifying secret. If, during Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark, you find your mouth agape, it’s more likely your letting loose a yawn than a scream. Guy Pearce and Katie Holmes play parent and guardian respectively to Sally (Bailee Madison), a sulky Los Angeleno forcibly relocated to Rhode Island and relinquished into her father’s care. While exploring the nooks and crannies of her lonely new home, Sally awakens a long-dormant evil, and yada yada yada.

Where it isn’t derivative, Nixey’s film is asinine. Even the title makes no sense. Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark is a movie that validates fear of the dark. The characters don’t surmount their supernatural oppressors with courage; they fight them with light. That is, when they think to. Somebody ought to propose an “all lights all the time” policy in this house, because the amount of time spent fumbling for flashlights is entirely unnecessary.

Del Toro co-wrote the screenplay with Matthew Robbins, and there isn’t a fresh idea between them. A thematically faithful remake of the 1973 TV movie of the same name, 2011’s Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark is haunted by logical fallacies, dull stereotypes, and uninspired scare tactics. Has del Toro become so ensconced in his producorial duties that his writing has irrevocably lost its creative spark? I hope for The Hobbit‘s sake it hasn’t.

Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark is so uniformly sloppy, however, that no one person can shoulder the blame. The acting is subpar; I can’t remember the last time I saw an entire cast deliver such a collectively mediocre performance. Whether fault lies with the actors themselves or the inexperienced director is debatable, but that the film suffers is undeniable.

If a paltry few circumstantially effective jump scares are your measure of success, then by all means plunk down your 11 bucks for Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark. Just don’t expect to be afraid. Every year we get a few great dramas, and one or two good comedy and action flicks. What gives? Why should horror have the lowest success ratio, and its fans the lowest standards? When was the last time a film genuinely scared you?

Audiences shouldn’t settle for Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark. Like a bad porno, we’re left bored by its expository sequences in anticipation of the action. And then the action arrives and underwhelms. We can’t even fast-forward. The whole dim, dumb movie is an exercise in textbook tedium, created as though by combining at random items from the approved horror glossary, 666th edition. Horror, like porn, leans on the believability of its flimsily constructed reality. When that spell is broken, it’s only too apparent that you’re staring at some guy’s bare ass. In this case, del Toro’s. — Colin

SCORE: 1.5 stars





  • Tim

    Well, I saw this movie a week ago and thought it was pretty good for a kind of goofy horror movie. (You’re lack of understanding of horror sub-genres, and target audience and intent within is evident.) I thought it should have been PG-13, as it really seems to be for the kids.

    You can go into any movie arms crossed over your chest, with a ‘whatever, this is stupid’ attitude and not be affected.

    Let’s put the question back on you – When was the last time a film viewed in the theatre scared you?

    Also, your ‘horror is like porn’ comparison? That’s really creative, fresh stuff- really mind blowing!

    p.s.
    Your last two mentions of the similarities between porn and horror bring up ‘expository sequences’ and ‘believability… of constructed reality’.

    They still make that, fuck-movies with stories? And more to the point, you’re a man with private access to the internet, and you watch all that story stuff?

    Hope you have a good week of pizza deliveries, Colin.

  • David

    I’ve got to agree. No idea if this film is good or bad, the inappropriate obsession with porn comparisons doesn’t create any credibility.

    And news that Katie Holmes can’t act? Not news.

    Dave

  • Colin

    “Inappropriate?” “Obsession?” The porn comparisons were jokes to illustrate a point about Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark.

    Tim: In terms of “goofy” Horror, Drag Me to Hell was LEAGUES more entertaining. In terms of effective scares, Insidious had a few. Paranormal Activity had a few.

    I don’t go into any movie with my arms crossed, I just had no fun watching this one.

  • James

    I love how some people will get their panties in a bunch as soon as some one expresses their own opinion. Hilarious stuff.

  • James

    Also, you are going to go to the lengths of attacking the person reviewing the movie by including something like, “hope you enjoy delivering pizza, Colin.” What does that have to do with Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark? Learn to make a good debate without verbally attacking the other, then you will sound smart and your argument as well.

  • Indianamcclain

    I’m in agreement with Colin and this was one of my most anticipated movies of the summer.

  • I really enjoyed the first thirty minutes or so, and thought this was going to be a good, solid horror movie. Unfortunately, it fell apart after that thirty minute mark, and became silly and disappointing. Such a shame. I was settled in for a fun time. Too bad.

    Also very puzzled about the film’s “R” rating. Why?

  • T. Heilman

    Wow, R Rated? I saw it Friday and it was rated 14-A. Evidently Ontario still holds the distinction of being Canada’s most uptight province. Anyway I thought the review was a bit harsh. It was decent.

  • Just to clarify, this movie is rated 14-A in Ontario. Shannon is in the U.S.

  • LUDY

    “I love how some people will get their panties in a bunch as soon as some one expresses their own opinion. Hilarious stuff.”

    Exactly. This behavior is all over the internet, unfortunately. It’s like, “I didn’t like ‘this’ and here are the reasons why…” Then someone quickly follows up with, “I did like ‘it’, and your reasons for not liking it are stupid, and I HATE you.”

    Yep, that’s the internet in a nutshell…that and porn.

    I haven’t seen this film, and based on what I hear, I probably won’t.

  • Wintle

    Horror is my favourite genre, yet I have no problem agreeing with Colin that very few wide-release horror movies are worth the effort. However, I would suggest that this is the end result of what studios decide is most palatable for a wide theatrical audience, which shouldn’t necessarily reflect the quality of the entire genre. The truth is, the majority of really outstanding horror movies of the past few years have only been available through festivals or DVD.

    In addition, I would guess that the reason comedy and action seem to have a greater number of critical successes than horror in any given year is that they also have a greater number of wide theatrical releases. I took a quick count of the top 150 movies of 2010. To be fair, I disregarded any movie whose genre I was unsure of, and in the event that a movie could be considered both a comedy and an action movie I placed it in one column or the other. Anything that could even marginally go into horror I placed in that group (eg. Predators, Black Swan). I also included any semi-wide theatrical horror release, even if it wasn’t in the top 150. In the end, action and comedy had well over 30 movies apiece, and horror had half that at 15. Again, this was skewed in favour of comedy and action. More rigourous study would no doubt make the disparity even greater.

    Finally, I always cringe when someone suggests that the only good horror movies are those that scare its audience. I’m rarely frightened by movies anymore. The best I can usually hope for is anxiety, and some of my favourite horror movies don’t even achieve that.

  • Tim

    Yes, agreed- people (like me) knee jerk and get defensive… I apologize. I didn’t really look at the movie too critically, I saw it at a free screening and thought ‘good enough’. I guess I really didn’t expect much, TV remake, little girl, etc. I cringed a couple times and was creeped out at the end.

    When I said ‘goofy’ – I think I meant silly… as in ‘seems silly to adults’. I think the rating and marketing of this movie to anyone over 15 was the problem – I’m old, I know the tropes and yeah, there’s nothing new here.

    But I looked at it as something a younger tween or 13-14 year old could watch and enjoy (produced by Disney, I bet they punted to the Miramax label when Del Toro wanted to go R). This is what I should have said, instead of getting my panties in a bunch. Now they are all jammed up in my arsehole.

    re: Porn refs. Not sure I believe they were ‘jokes’, the logic of the comparison was expounded on a couple times. Anyways, I thought there were a couple $ shots in this relatively plain ‘no one believes me’ horror tale!

    The pizza delivery thing was a reference to porn and the ‘fantasies’ offered up. I don’t think Colin is a pizza delivery driver.

    #4 I agree with Wintle’s points.

    Humbly and with much respect and love of porn and the subjective opinion of others,
    Tim

  • Colin

    My intention in mentioning porn twice was only to link the first and last paragraphs.

    While I may not have been joking outright with the comparison, I definitely didn’t write it thinking I had stumbled onto some incredibly astute observation. When I dislike movies as much as I disliked Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark, I have to manufacture a way to make writing the review tolerable. In this case, it was porn.