Cowboys & Aliens Review

Cowboys & Aliens
Directed by: John Favreau
Written by: Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman & Damon Lindelof, Mark Fergus & Hawk Ostby (screenplay), Scott Mitchell Rosenberg (comic)
Starring: Daniel Craig, Abigail Spencer, Harrison Ford, Sam Rockwell, Paul Dano, Noah Ringer, Clancy Brown

Cowboys & Aliens sticks to its guns. Symbolically, that might suggest a certain strength, but in truth it means the filmmakers couldn’t have played it any safer. The story is a weak hodgepodge of ideas riding past the point of homage clear into Cliché County. The crisp, colorful visuals likewise present an unmemorable wallpaper of established western and science fiction iconography devoid of individual vision.

It’s a clear case of too many cooks. Credited to a screenwriting seven, their conglomerated output is anything but magnificent. With a cast of caricatures that includes an amnesiac outlaw (Daniel Craig), a bumbling medicine man (Sam Rockwell), and a grizzled cattle rancher (Harrison Ford), director Jon Favreau’s crack team of creatives had their bases covered with western stereotypes. Their failure is in their unwillingness or inability to add anything beyond extraterrestrials to the mix.

Stripped of its sci-fi gimmick, the world collapses. These people aren’t compelling in their own right, and their predictable reaction to an otherworldly threat negates the period setting. The titular visitors are off-handedly called demons, but the unique perspective of a society that hasn’t yet read H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds is absent. Explaining the invasion using Christian ideology might have helped set Cowboys & Aliens apart, but it subsists instead solely on the novelty of combining its constituent genres while doing neither justice.

Presumably because the audience is expected and even depended on not to think, the screenplay circumvents such ambiguity at every turn. Instead of allowing our turn-of-the-century protagonist to make sense of the ordeal on his own terms, religious or otherwise, the writers employ an expendable, expository character to do it for him. Do we really need to know the back story and endgame of the antagonists? It used to be enough just to know they’re here and they’re dangerous.

Then there’s the aliens themselves. It seems almost unjust to criticize the creature design given how low Hollywood has set the bar, but Cowboys & Aliens‘ take is particularly uninspired. Bearing resemblance to the grasshoppers from Pixar’s A Bug’s Life, these cartoony insectoids feel completely at odds with the gritty western setting. Granted, dichotomy is the name of the game, but when they share screen space with our human heroes, the result is more Who Framed Roger Rabbit? than was likely intended.

But far more important than its intellectual and stylistic shortcomings is the fun factor. Cowboys & Aliens has a handful of decent set pieces, though its climactic battle is too helter-skelter to impress. Aerial assaults in the aliens’ mechanized dragonfly drones prove most entertaining, though remain too few and far between. Their unannounced arrival is especially memorable and chaotic, but as the scale escalates, the stakes never ante up.

Cowboys & Aliens is a hopelessly average blockbuster. Big stars, bigger budget, and zero staying power. Much has been made of the “risk” associated with Favreau helming such an unproven franchise. After all, where are the wizards, the superheroes, and the vampires? This is not a brave film, nor the work of a brave filmmaker. Universal Pictures inherits the slim financial risk that this oddball mash up won’t recoup its hundred million dollars; Favreau himself takes none.

In other words, he sticks to his guns. He fulfills his contractual obligation to bring the offbeat Cowboys & Aliens comic to the screen, but traverses cautiously over the safest possible path to deliver it. Call that what you will, but cowardice has a nice ring to it. — Colin

SCORE: 2.5 stars





  • Derek McFarland

    I’ll take a Favreau movie over some shitty Michael Bay film (especially sequel, for that matter) any day of the week.

  • I’d be curious to see some kind of analysis about what too many writers can do to a film. How many movies out there that had a large amount of screenwriters *didn’t* come off as a muddled mess, or worse, a formulaic by-the-numbers exercise? My guess is not many.

    There seems a point where, if you’re not satisfied with the script, it’s best to throw it away and start again.

    Anyway, as you said, that looks like where this one went. Sad too. The idea is certainly an intriguing one.

  • MamaCass

    I liked it…a lot actually. Granted I was screening for chemical splices and scratches and whatnot but I still really got into it. I never once felt bored or under-stimulated. I loved the contrast of the western and sci-fi genres and thought all of the special effects were great. I liked how you described the aliens as looking like the grasshoppers from A Bug’s Life, I chuckled at that one :) Although personally I like there being some sort of back story or REASON to there being an invasion, which I also enjoyed about Battle L.A. I have never appreciated there being no explanation for the aliens showing up, killing everyone, then leaving…it never made sense to me. Regardless of any cliches I think there was enough of a fresh take on them to keep me from being bored or predicting the whole movie, which is rare for me these days.

  • Pretty much in agreement, Colin, so excellent review! Among some other things that bugged (pun intention pending…) me were the aliens’ on-again/off-again immunity to bullets as well as the use of alien technology all but invalidating the setting (not as bad as Captain America’s laser-robot-Nazis, but still)–it’s pretty much Independence Day but in the old west and without the delightful Harvey Fierstein and Judd Hirsch…or any humor, for that matter.

    Also, Harrison Ford is brutal in this film–his performance reminded me of Jay’s criticism of all the recent Sigourney Weaver performances.

  • Nick

    How exactly does that add up to a 2.5? I was kind of surprised when I saw your rating. As I was reading I thought for sure that this was going to be a 1 or 1.5 tops. I’m curious…

  • Justice

    It was just brutally boring. Not once in the whole movie did I ever think “damn that was a cool scene.” Isn’t that why we go to summer blockbusters? At least Transformers 3 had some things I’d never seen before. I just felt bad for the actors. I like Ford, Daniel Craig, Sam Rockwell, Walter Goggins, and Adam Beach. All of them are great actors. They just had absolutely nothing to work with here. It’s a shame really. Though I’m sick of this idea that modern aliens design sucks. What the hell are they supposed to look like? The fucking blob?

  • Pres Mony

    “Laserblast” in the Old West…pass.

  • I’m a big fan of Favreau and just about everyone involved in this film – but this one really, really let me down. I didn’t really care about any of the characters or their fate.

  • Lori Cerny

    Whoa, shocked at the review as I really, really loved this film. I was engrossed throughout, enjoyed the subtle humor presented by Harrison Ford (Colonel Dolarhyde), the visual and dialogue cues to Raiders of the Lost Ark and Star Wars, and the settings were beautiful. Each of the characters had enough back story to individualize them and their various story arcs remained clear.

    Most particular – the underlying analogy to the Nazi concentration camps was handled well. Did everyone else miss that point? I thought it was done tastefully without becoming ludicrous, melodramatic, or exploitative.