Thor Review

Thor
Directed by: Kenneth Branagh
Written by: Ashley Miller & Zack Stentz, Don Payne (screenplay), J. Michael Straczynski, Mark Protosevich (story)
Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Stellan Skarsgård, Kat Dennings

Thor operates under the mistaken assumption that Thor is cool. Marvel’s unsolicited film adaptation makes no attempt to entice an audience that may yet be unfamiliar with this benchwarmer hero. Peter Parker was a dweeb; Bruce Wayne lost his parents; Clark Kent was abandoned at birth; great comic heroes have compelling origin stories. Our introduction to Thor is as a spoiled warmonger about to ascend to kinghood. Why are we rooting for this guy, again?

Pitting your audience against the protagonist is something a filmmaker the caliber of a P.T. Anderson can pull off, but I’m pretty sure we’re supposed to like Thor. Maybe we’re supposed to sympathize when daddy takes away his mallet, but once the eponymous meathead is booted from his cushy Asgardian throne, he crash lands on Earth as a colossal buffoon. See Thor get tased. See Thor smash a coffee mug while a glib teenager uploads a photo to Facebook and you’ll have an idea just how low the comedy here is flying. Watch your heads.

Thor treats Thor with such undeserved adulation that reducing the thunder god to a punch line in the second act comes like a bolt from the blue. Following a foundation of pretentious melodrama set in a Seussian CGI metropolis, even the more successful attempts at humor later on play foreign and weird. And just to keep the audience on its toes, the tone wobbles wildly to and fro like a pair of burly Norsemen on a teeter-totter.

I’ve got nothing against flawed heroes. Thor’s arrogance might have helped make his story worth telling. Instead, the filmmakers (with credit to no less than five writers) waste two hours attempting to redeem him in the audience’s eyes. Still, the real problem is that the character is uninteresting. It’s more than possible some of the nuance of the comic books has been lost in translation, but I can’t think of a single trait that makes Thor (Chris Hemsworth) appealing.

The same goes for the rest of the cast. Natalie Portman plays a scientist who ought to be studying the mysteries of her missing personality, and Stellan Skarsgård plays her mentor, an equally pale placeholder character. Rounding out their misfit team is Kat Dennings, whose character description might as well read: “Social media junkie; loves her iPod, and whatever else those damned teenagers are into nowadays.”

The aesthetic of Thor is as bland as its players. Director Kenneth Branagh, best known for his Shakespearean endeavors, takes a ‘broken tripod’ approach to directing this summer tent pole. He has cinematographer Haris Zambarloukos frame half his shots diagonally in lieu of investing in a coherent visual style. Branagh is elsewhere absent as the shepherd of his cast — otherwise proven performers mumble their way through the movie.

As if Thor didn’t have enough shame to contend with as a D-list superhero, his big screen debut is similarly underwhelming. Instead of making a case for the character, Branagh and a gaggle of screenwriters cement his lame duck status in this bludgeoningly boring popcorn flick. Even undiscerning cinemagoers looking for little more than a two-hour refuge from the summer sun have better choices available to them. Comic book aficionados likewise have no shortage of spandex to look forward to in the coming weeks.

After years of warming the bench, Thor finally got called into the big game, only to slip up and sustain a career-ending injury on his first play. That’s gotta hurt. — Colin

SCORE: 1.5 stars





  • Hey look everyone!!!!! I can pick my nose and wipe it on the wall too!! Thanks Colin, for a review as bland and uninspired as the material it covered. Though I’m inclined to agree with some of the points you attempted to make, as I am no Thor die-hard or apologist, your overall writing left me desperately wanting a refund on what I paid for the review. Oh…….damn.

  • kyri

    “Thor operates under the mistaken assumption that Thor is cool.”

    No, you made that assumption the movie makes it quite clear that Thor is an arrogant douchebag right from the begining. There are other characters to like. If you are that an idiot that can’t watch a film if he doesn’t like the main character: Natalie portman.

    “Maybe we’re supposed to sympathize when daddy takes away his mallet,”

    No, you are not.

    “Why are we rooting for this guy, again?”

    gee.. I don’t know.. maybe because he sacrificed himself in order to safe Earth and his people..?

    Not enough?
    Maybe if he was portrayed as a dweeb; That would be more Original.

    Colin. you sir are officially the king of snobs.

  • alechs

    “Maybe if he was portrayed as a dweeb; That would be more THORiginal.”

  • Matt

    Kyri it’s called an opinion and I actually agree with it.

  • These are ALL opinions!!! Mine, Kyri’s, YOURS Matt! I’m glad you agree with Colin’s review. It’s always nice to know when you are in the company of likeminded individuals. That being said, isn’t the whole point of having forums and message boards to help initiate dialogue? I mean, I like to be surrounded by sycophantic nut lickers as much as the next guy with any amount of ego, but not when it comes to the things I am passionate about. Heated debates help drive said passions and ultimately aid in making something that much more important to me. Thus the exchanges on a given subject become that much more interesting. Of course there’s always room for some trash talk and some friendly ribbing to help kick off a heated debate with multiple viewpoints, but one thing I think we can all agree there ISN’T much room for, are people who get butt-hurt at the first sign of differences of opinion. If we all loved Thor to the point of circle jerking about it, why would we be here in the first place? Don’t you have some spit-wads to shoot or something?

  • Before I become the catalyst for a conversation the spins completely out of control, I would just like to mention that I, in no way wish to incite any personal attacks. As someone who writes well thought out reviews, I’m sure Colin can agree that a writer/critic needs to possess the ability to graciously accept praise and criticism alike, and every now and then a cheap shot helps keep him on his toes. He’s written many solid reviews in the past, and I was merely giving him a hard time about this one. Just because I didn’t like this review, doesn’t mean he’s not one of the many reasons we all come to this site. Anyone seen that new Care Bears movie? I think it’s a Spike Lee Joint

  • Rick

    Well i liked it. I’m no big Thor fan, i don’t care for Marvel. if you have read anything from me it’s clear to see i am a huge die hard batman fan from the beginning to the end.

    but i will say i thought this movie was awesome. it explained the origin of thor. who thor was. and how he became to be. you didnt have to follow the comics your whole life to get a feel for who he was and who he became to be. the acting in my oppinion was solid. i liked refrences to other superhero’s like hawk man and iron man. it was funny. and at times clever. i THORoughly enjoyed it. and i’d go see it again.

    now to adress the argument. i agree with brick or whoever said it. we all have oppinions, why attack someone based on it. you can confront someones oppinion with out attacking the person. its the oppinion you don’t like, not the person. as an adult you need to learn to seperate the two

    also colin i really enjoy your reviews. well written and versed and usually spot on. i disagree with you on this one, but i know it takes alot of time and effort to write these reviews and i appreciate you for this.

    till next time!

  • AMEN

  • Colin

    I appreciate the response, and expect and encourage anyone to defend their opinion if they disagree with me. Looking at the Tomatometer, I acknowledge I am in the minority in disliking Thor, but that won’t stop me from pointing out exactly why I thought it was terrible.

    Brick is right. As a critic, you do have to be able to take criticism, but I’m not sure I understand the nature of his (her?) complaint. What was it you disliked about my review? Were the points not articulately made? How better to make them? Was the language lacking? Let me know.

  • I disagree with you, Colin. Your reviews often read like you check other reviewers first, then paraphrase them. Will the real Colin please stand up!

    Maybe it got an extra point because I expected so little from it, but Thor was the comic book movie I was least looking forward to this summer, and I really enjoyed it. It had issues, such as a lack of explanation of Loki’s motivations (that was just a bit of mischief!), but I thought that the actors sold it all well.

  • Colin

    Deven, I never read reviews until after I finish my own. Maybe great minds think alike… or maybe my reviews just show up after you’ve already read what everyone else has to say.

  • Aaron

    Soooooooo….you’re saying you liked the movie. 8^)

  • El Ultimo Hombre

    The biggest thing you got wrong here isn’t subjective, it’s that you view Thor as a “D-list superhero”. Thor is far from a benchwarmer. He’s one of the most powerful heroes in the Marvel universe and a founding member of the Avengers. Just because the general public may not know much about him doesn’t drop him down in the pantheon of heroes.

  • I agree with some of the points Colin made. Thor is, overall, a bland character. The “relationship” between him and Natalie Portman was non-existent. The humor mostly fell way flat for me… but I still enjoyed the bulk of the movie. How the hell does that happen? I think it has to do with the genuinely interesting arc of Loki and everything that happens on Asgard. That shit was choice!

  • Captain N

    I actually really enjoyed Thor far more than I was expecting to. There is certainly a superhero template that these films follow, especially the Marvel films, so they all tend to hit the same beats, but I felt at the very least that Thor did it in an interesting way to separate itself from the pack. I liked that this wasn’t an “origin” story in the typical sense. He was already technically Thor.

    I felt the conflict between the Thor and Loki certainly had far more weight than any of the other Marvel films to date as well. Unlike others complaining about the earth scenes, I really enjoyed them and felt that they supplemented adding Thor to our world relatively well. As far as Thor being a bad ass, I have no real opinion on that. I didn’t think he was any more or less a bad ass than Iron Man, the Incredible Hulk or Spiderman.

    Unfortunately I had to watch the film in 3D, which was an eye sore. I really look forward to checking it out on blu ray in 2D in the future.

  • Goon

    I wholeheartedly endorse this review.

  • kyri

    or maybe all the other critics read colin’s reviews first before writing theirs?

    @Rick I would go see it again as well.

    I understand giving this film a 2.5 but giving it a 1.5
    I truly cannot comprehend. It was a solid entertaining film, not unnecessary pretentiously convoluted, not boring at all, with nice quirky jokes, good special effects and solid acting from everyone. If you gave this a 1.5 then how can you rate a truly bad film?

    I ask Colin now, Did you preferred the jokes from transformers 2? Did you missed the solid performance of megan fox?

    Sure it is easy to say I hated both but seriously
    Can’t you tell the difference?

    Sure it had some cliches like the relationship between Thor and Natalie portman. But the relationship between the hero and his family (father and brother) was something that was never explored before in a comic book film. And the final scene with loki was indeed very effective..

  • kyri

    Did eats -ed. Did eats -ed.

  • Colin

    Kyri, the short answer to your question is yes, Transformers 2 is worse than Thor.

  • swarez

    I wasn’t a fan as well. I think Thor is a weak hero to begin with and this adaption didn’t make him any better, even though they tried really hard to make people like him. The transition between the two worlds worked most of the time but when the two meet it became ridiculous, Thor and Co looked lame in those outfits in the real world and so I thought the best laugh of the film was the Xena, Jackie Chan and Robin Hood joke.
    And as a scandinavian the pronunciations of the characters names were cringe worthy. Especially King Laufey, since Laufey is a woman’s name and always has been.

  • Oliver

    This review has that “I was determined to hate it” vibe. For one, it highlights some glaring gaps in Colin’s understanding of its intent. You’re not supposed to like Thor in the beginning (even the trailers showed he was a douche that would have to learn humility). Shouldn’t a critic understand basic plot points before commenting on them, even if he doesn’t agree with the execution of said plot?

    Did it have some pacing issues? Definitely. Were some of the jokes cheesy? Yeah. But a 1.5-star rating smacks of “I need to be different, so I’ll hate this extra”. Unless you’re going in expecting “Terms of Endearment”, I don’t know how you could truthfully hate it that much.

    At least give it credit for ignoring the “we’ve got to be dark and realistic” trend in comic movies and giving us pure fantasy. I don’t know how you can watch a god with a hammer carving a swath through frost giants and not enjoy it.

    Oh, and if Thor is a D-list hero, so is Iron Man (neither of them actually are).

  • Colin

    Oliver,

    Maybe we’re not supposed to admire Thor early on, but the filmmakers presume we like him. (i.e. I like Daniel Plainview, but I don’t admire him).

    Also, from the perspective of a comic outsider, Thor is a D-list hero. I’m not consulting some consensus chart of the superhero hierarchy when I make that quip, I just don’t think the majority of audiences had even heard of the character before they saw his face on a bus.

  • Strand0410

    Bad review.

  • Strand0410

    Oh my, now REALLY taking the time to nitpick, I’m not sure where to start here.

    “Our introduction to Thor is as a spoiled warmonger about to ascend to kinghood. Why are we rooting for this guy, again?”

    You’re not supposed to. It’s a classic, cathartic superhero origin story. Bruce Wayne started out as a bloodthirsty douchebag, Tony Stark was a careless playboy who was an indirect murderer of thousands in the first acts of each of their stories. Or did you conveniently forget this?

    Parts like this “See Thor smash a coffee mug while a glib teenager uploads a photo to Facebook” make me wonder if you’re writing this based on the trailer alone. Yes, some humour is meant to be topical and sometimes misses the mark, but there are plenty of moments of heart and humour that hard my cinema laughing and enjoying.

    RT seems to echo the same sentiment which makes me wonder which of us is more out-of-touch, or if you simply walked into the movie determined to write a scathing review. Even the ‘Facebook’ scene (one of maybe 2 which irked me personally) had laughs in my audience, yet I can’t help but detect an undercurrent of pretentious disdain for modern pop culture.

    “the real problem is that the character is uninteresting” – Opinion/conjecture/hot air.. whatever you wish to call it.

    “Director Kenneth Branagh, best known for his Shakespearean endeavors, takes a ‘broken tripod’ approach to directing this summer tent pole” – Dutch angles are a legitimate technique that if used effectively can frame certain scenes extremely well. This was never noticeable to me (and I usually pick out shit like this), or the other dozens of more qualified critics who didn’t find it quite as obnoxious as you did, though it did pop up in some of the more passive-aggressive reviews, which leads me to suspect you read a few before writing this while looking for ammunition.

    “Also, from the perspective of a comic outsider, Thor is a D-list hero. I’m not consulting some consensus chart of the superhero hierarchy when I make that quip”

    Wrong again, you’re taking your own insulated experience regarding the franchise and comic books in general and assuming everyone shares it. Which, morally presumptuous to begin with, is simply unprofessional once you start throwing blanket statements about subjects that you freely admit being clueless about.

    Yes, this review just reeks of being contrary for its own sake. Many positives which most people enjoyed about Thor have been overlooked to nitpick minor problems which evidently didn’t impinge on the experience of the dozens more respected reviewers I perused. One wonders if Colin is attempting to become the new Armand White.

  • Colin

    Strand,

    I’m curious what you think my goal is here. You accuse me of plagiarizing other critics, reviewing Thor based on the trailer, and being purposely contrarian to popular opinion. And yet here I am writing about movies in my free time because I love doing it and I love film. Hell, I would love to love everything I see.

    You treat “opinion” like it’s a dirty word. Like a review should be a sterile piece of textbook analysis on a given topic. I don’t see the medium that way. This review IS my opinion of Thor and I don’t ask anyone to share it. Naturally, I think I’m right, but unlike you, I’m willing to entertain the notion that someone feels differently.

  • Storge

    Well said Colin. I for one had never heard of Thor, haven’t seen the movie, but superhero genre is not my thang. I thought your review was well crafted and made solid points supporting your point of view.

  • I don’t understand why people have to accuse Colin of being disingenuous. He just happens to write with confidence and authority, and people mistake that for him being smug. I agree with most of his review, even if I gave it a slightly higher score. I’m surprised people are being so forgiving of the film when it’s clear that so many elements simply don’t work.

  • Lots of good points. I liked it more than Colin and disagree here and there but this is by no measure a bad review. I often disagree with Colin but he always makes a strong case for his point of view.

  • Strand0410

    Colin,

    If my tone came off as being accusatory, then I apologise, I was quite incensed. In hindsight, I don’t really think you mean to be a self-appointed contrarian, but rather misguided and allowed external opinion to affect your scoring.

    If it came down to choosing whether to sledge a $150 million blockbuster disaster, or a humble (yet misguided) indie, we’d all choose to take the blockbuster down a few notches. I think Thor just happened to be that week’s blockbuster for you, and thus ‘deserved’ a point or 2 deducted for no other reason than tall poppy syndrome.

    While opinion is unavoidable, there’s a very fine line between stating your own, and presenting it as fact (or more correct than others). It doesn’t take a genius to analyse a well-written review to see editing artifacts eg. careful substitution of pronouns and addition of disclaimers such as “I thought”, “to me it seemed” or even simply…. “Personally”. Why? Because while it’s extremely tempting to believe YOU are right, toeing this makes your reviews come off as smug or self-righteous (which this one reveled in). Being respectful isn’t the same as being passive, just as being passionate isn’t the same as being vindictive.

    People aren’t disagreeing with you because they loved Thor, they disagree precisely because of the haphazard/illogical scoring and the flimsiness of your complaints. Do you really think Thor was a 1.5/4? Inferior to Rio, I Am Number Four, Saw 3D or half a dozen other turds you rated higher? Scoring is a relative scale, yet yours seem to be nothing BUT outliers.

    Ask yourself if YOU no knowledge about any of these films skimmed through these numbers and titles, if you’d think they made sense. Or if you, like me and apparently many others, would instead wonder if they were seemingly based on the time of day, will of the gods, or your monthly bad review/vent quota.

    No, I haven’t invested in Thor shares, none of my relatives are extras etc so that there’s some personal stake, nor did I even think it was amazing. Your points of criticisms in this particular review are flimsy, biased and result in a review that is not watertight. At the end of the day, I think it was simply unfair a review.

  • Colin

    Strand,

    I don’t intend to pass off my opinions as fact by strategically choosing not to include “I thought” before every sentence. It goes without saying that in a film review, you are subject to the viewpoint of the critic.

  • Anthony

    I thought the movie was really good, but whatevs.

  • kyri

    People basically now complain because this superhero films have started to develop a pattern.
    I just don’t care. I also like cheesecake. If you don’t like cheesecake, I ll have yours as well. If you change the recipe to impress me I ll be pissed and I will also drink your milkshake.

  • Yeah, this was a great Thor movie. The story of Thor is very mythic and this captured that. Thor and Loki are like the Man in Black and Jacob on LOST. This movie did an incredible job of telling their story in the first reel. The Frost Giants, The Warriors Three, Sif, Odin, and The Destroyer are all featured in a tale that includes people trying to lift Thor’s hammer and Loki taking control of the Rainbow Bridge while Odin is in the Odin Sleep. This was a kick ass Thor film!

    I want to see him use the hammer to open intradimensional portals into space in the next film. That was the only thing I felt like they should not have left out. Just a minor quibble.

  • Also, the film has a fantastic mis en scene and the Odin scenes offer some meat.

  • Shannon

    I’ll defend Colin here. Thor was a hunk of junk.

  • Robert

    Colin hasn’t said one good thing about a single movie he reviewed. Why the hell is he writing reviews on movies when he says nothing worth while about them other then. This movie sucked. Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit. If you’re going to bring up everything single little flaw with a movie you have to at least mention what was worth seeing. You’re a arrogant fool who can’t see any magic in creativity. Stop judging people on it.

  • Colin

    Robert,

    See my reviews of Bridesmaids, Fast Five, Insidious, and Rango for movies I’ve enjoyed in just the past two months.