Sucker Punch Review

Sucker Punch
Directed by: Zack Snyder
Written by: Zack Snyder & Steve Shibuya
Starring: Emily Browning, Vanessa Hudgens, Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone, Carla Gugino, Jamie Chung, Jon Hamm, Scott Glenn, Oscar Isaac

If the filmography of Robert Rodriguez were projected onto the wall of Plato’s cave, the fever dreams of its sorry inhabitants might come out something like this. Sucker Punch is an asylum for every unoriginal impulse that strikes director Zack Snyder’s attention deficient mind. It is an unmitigated disaster of storytelling — thematically diarrheic with visuals to match. This hopeless post-Inception melodrama isn’t based on a comic book like either of Snyder’s previous efforts, but every genre cliché carries over tenfold.

Like a pockmarked teen with an anime fetish, Snyder’s convoluted revenge flick plays out with a cast of buxom babes who look as though they might bleed mascara when cut. Stuffed into absurdly tight-fitting outfits, gals with names like Rocket, Baby Doll, and Sweet Pea unload thousands of shells from their semi-automatic rifles and leap columns of flames in when-exactly-was-this-cool-again slow motion.

The tiered fantasy worlds of Sucker Punch might be exciting if they corresponded in any way to the next reality over. Probably the most asinine aspect of Snyder and Steve Shibuya’s screenplay (I say probably because competition is steep) is that while our protagonist is fighting a 20-foot tall sourpussed samurai or fleeing a castle from an apoplectic dragon, we are meant to believe she is really — how should I put this — doing a sexy dance. A major structural component of Sucker Punch is Baby Doll’s escape from incarceration, a feat that necessitates trinkets such as a map, knife, lighter, and key, all of which are obtained by distracting their male overlords with… exotic dancing.

For every item on the checklist, Baby Doll gyrates — though while she cuts loose, she imagines she is annihilating clockwork Nazi soldiers in the trenches of a steampunk World War II, or tearing apart an android army on a futuristic bomb-strapped bullet train. The latter is set to a cover of the Beatles’ “Tomorrow Never Knows,” in which John Lennon once sang, “Turn off your mind,” and “Lay down all thought.” Snyder seems to have appropriated that message quite literally.

The bigger problem is that Snyder throws dramatic tension out the window by creating a fantasy world where nothing is at stake. The laws of these alternate realities are unclear at best, and the sequences themselves are purely masturbatory given that whatever happens is only loosely tied to the story we’re supposed to be following. I might be more forgiving of that conceit if Snyder really wowed, but Sucker Punch doesn’t bring a single idea to the table that hasn’t been done to death in movies or video games. Snyder does so much recycling that he ought to receive special commendation from Greenpeace.

It’s equally hard to muster up sympathy for his characters outside of their imaginary adventures. Snyder has a bad habit of using trauma as a binding agent between them and the audience; other than that Baby Doll fell under the shadow of an evil foster-father before imprisonment, there isn’t a single reason why we should care about her. She is as devoid of genuine personality as the rest of the cartoon cast.

Sucker Punch might have been a blast if the tone was more in line with Scott Pilgrim or even Kill Bill. Gratuitous action can be fun — just don’t ask me to take it seriously. The worst of Snyder’s misconceptions is that he can simultaneously blow shit up and pull our heartstrings. That he directs schlock under the pretense of style is laid bare in this, his first original work. Sucker Punch is not only brain dead, it’s contagiously stupid. It’s a high school sophomore’s juvenile doodles on an 82 million dollar budget. If Snyder’s filmography were projected on the wall of Plato’s cave, I think those poor bastards would welcome the first disorienting rays of sunlight and their freedom with open arms. — Colin

SCORE: 1.5 stars





  • Nuno

    Insightful, elegant and hilarious review, Colin! Awesome job!

  • ditto

  • Derek McFarland

    Wooo!!! Harsh review! “Hateful” doesn’t even sound like the right word ta use. Imma have ta check this flick out, just to see if it’s really that bad; cause I actually heard way different.

  • Film Ape

    Boom!

  • cronenfly

    colin! see some good movies for once!! ^_^

  • projectgenesis

    Hated kick ass, hated Scott P. But i quite enjoyed this. It made me think & insisted that I pay attention. Also, I love unreliable narrators. Not saying it was great and I always respect Colin’s reviews.

    But we all say fuck Fox for not taking a chance on Aronofsky to do Wolverine, so I say kudos to Warner Bros. for letting Snyder do his thing. The results may be less than perfect, but I’ll take it every time over remakes, adaptations or sequels.

  • Fatbologna

    I think that the best insight in this review as to why this didn’t work is the lack of humor. I’d originally heard that Snyder was doing something in the vein of Russ Meyer’s stuff. This same storyline done with it’s tongue in it’s cheek and an R-rating could have been gold. It could have been the greatest live-action version of a Heavy Metal comic ever but it sounds like they went with back-breaking, melodramatic heaviness instead.

    Not fun.

  • Cakadoodle

    Give em hell

  • Captain N

    I think the hate for this film has been hyperbolic. It’s definitely not a great film by any means, but it does have some interesting ideas. Unfortunately they just never come together. The film is directed with great confidence. Snyder clearly is loving what he is doing, the script just wasn’t there. He should have passed the idea off to a better writer, one who could sort through the ideas, get rid of the back ones, take the ones and pull them together. Either way, I felt that this film was better than 300, but I hated 300.

  • Well Colin loves his hyperbole.

    I think the real shame is that Warner Bros. will now only invest in more generic films and become more risk averse. At least the idea of a dark anime has some interesting appeal. It seems to be a nightmarish version of Sailor Moon, with the side-effect of being a nightmare to watch. Some credit is deserved in that it at least had ambitions and was risking failure.

  • Chris

    I like what projectgenesis said above. It’s true I don’t have any interest in seeing this movie, and I don’t really doubt that it’s not all that great, but I AM happy that it was made because it’s something different. This might have been a miss, but different is good.

  • Falsk

    Wait, what? How is this a “dark Sailor Moon” other than the fact that Babydoll was wearing a sailor uniform?

    Furthermore, what was “different” or “unique” about this film?

  • Anthony

    Meh, I thought it was ok, and still liked it better than Watchmen.

  • Matt

    I disagree about the movie not having stakes. I was feeling this for the first half of the movie, but then certain events happen and by the end of the film it is made very clear that there are in fact stakes to the film, and that the dream sequences do matter in a very disconnected and abstract way, but then the fantasy sequences of Pan’s labyrinth were very abstract and disconnected as well.

    I think enjoyment of this movie will come down to how much you can tolerate snyder’s style of action and his bag of tricks. If you can stomach them you will find Sucker Punch to be a flawed visual treat, but if you already got enough of that in watchmen and 300 then there is pretty much nothing here for you.

  • Combined with the hammering it took on the podcast, I’ll be avoiding this like hell.

  • Derek McFarland

    I should have known that Nuno would be the first one to comment and agree with Colin’s review (knowing how much of a Snyder hater he is, anyway), after the dispute we had on
    “The Man Of Steel” movie review. And of course, I’m willing to bet my 72′ Nova that he didn’t even bother to see this film.

    After reading this more than hateful review (last night) I decided ta check it out today at the Imax, with family & friends; just to see if it was as terrible as Colin made it out to be.
    In my opinion, and everyone else who I watched it with thought the movie was fuckin awesome.
    With the feel of Return To OZ, Girl Interrupted,
    Heavy Metal, Moulin Rouge, and Appleseed all balled into one, with a great soundtrack. I was sold on the visuals alone. As for originality… I wouldn’t say the movie was completely unoriginal. It was more like an inspirational art film. No different than what Tarantino has done with his movies. Q.T. has paid homage to every movie he has ever made (from Black exploitation films to campy Asian/American grindhouse movies)and people still love him for it. What Q.T. does in dialogue, Snyder makes up in Visual detail.
    It’s not what you direct, it’s how you direct it.

    Snyder’s style/art of course, differs like any other movie artist. More so in the fantasy world.
    Zack (like Q.T.) directs, mainly for him self more than for his audience, and that’s what being a true artist is about.
    His fans/ anti fans do somewhat remind me of Tarantino’s (they either like his movies or don’t). I’ve liked all of Tino’s flicks… even the ones I didn’t care much for; and the same goes for Snyder. I think Sucker Punch was definitely one of the better ones.
    For those of you who haven’t seen this movie, but like any of the films or books I compared this movie to, I highly suggest you check it out. And for those of you (like Nuno) who prefer movies like
    Brokeback Mounta…. I mean, The Dark Knight or something that doesn’t involve going outside the reality box… don’t watch it. “Each to his own.” Right Nuno?

    @Fatbologna… The movie was originally made with an R rating in mind, but Zack was forced to take out almost 20 minutes of the movie, due to “too much” violence and a certain sexual dance sequence. Figured they would make more lettuce with a PG-13 rating(although it did feel somewhat R-ish to me). Anyway the good news is, Zack mentioned in an interview that those 20 minutes will be added back on, when it hits Blu-Ray.

  • The comparisons between Zack Snyder and QT have got to stop. They are not even in the same universe of filmmaking talent.

    Also, for the record, I’d rather watch a million remakes over an “original” project like this.

  • As long an Oldboy remake with Will Smith isn’t on that list…

  • Derek McFarland

    I quote Dalton…”Opinions Vary…”
    Of course they’re not in the same universe. Q.T. hasn’t done fantasy or horror unless you count Death Proof (lol)… only drama or corky action. But they both have their movie & book inspirations, and they are both talented in there own way; which is something to compare. I’m not saying one director is better than the other, cause it depends on who likes what, when it comes to film. I like both directors very much; and both for different reasons (in the art sense).
    Snyder is known for using a lot of green screen fx and over the top slow motion shots in comic book like films/ Q.T. is known for jumbling up chapters and always trying to fit the “N” word in his exploitation inspired movies.
    @Sean
    You may say comparisons have to stop, but they won’t.

  • Derek McFarland

    @sean

    Speaking of remakes, I’ll bet you had a blast watchin,
    The Karate Kid 2010.

  • Fatbologna
  • Derek McFarland

    @Fatbologna

    HAHAHAHA!…..Straight up, and well put, sir! :D

  • The problem is Sean franchise films will remain even more prevalent at the risk of not making something more adventurous. It’s not a matter of missing out on films this bad, but the ones that are never made. For example At the Mountain of Madness now seems an even worse proposition even if concessions were made.

    I hated this film but find it akin to Southland Tales. A director with inexplicable levels of control. That actually made the ordeal interesting and it was a great throwback to United Artists without quite sinking the ship.

  • Derek McFarland

    @Juan Costrada
    Southland Tales is a perfect example, when it comes to styles of directing. It was one of my least favorite Richard Kelly films; however, I did find it interesting enough to give it kudos for originality.