The Adjustment Bureau Review

The Adjustment Bureau
Directed by: George Nolfi
Written by: George Nolfi (screenplay), Philip K. Dick (story)
Starring: Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, John Slattery, Anthony Mackie

The Adjustment Bureau is preposterous, and before you counter with “Well, duh, it’s science fiction,” allow me to elaborate. I’m down with the premise that mankind is safeguarded by an invisible shadow organization that dictates the paths we follow and the decisions we make — what baffles me is that they achieve these means through (spoiler alert?) magic hats. I wish I were joking.

The single biggest misstep in this bungled Philip K. Dick adaptation is that the mystique of our antagonists is dispelled almost instantaneously. We get to know our aggressors who, as it turns out, are anything but aggressive. To compare genres, there’s never been a great thriller where the detective in pursuit of a killer is ‘just doing their job.’ Passion breeds compelling cinema, and the paper pushers at the heart of The Adjustment Bureau are supremely uninteresting.

Despite the fact that they are explicitly “not human,” a very human error sets the plot in motion. An Adjustment Bureau agent oversleeps (these guys sleep?), thus congressman and senate hopeful David Norris (Matt Damon) catches an early bus, bumping into a familiar comely Englishwoman (Emily Blunt) whom he was never supposed to see again. The film’s saving grace is the pair’s believable rapport, but after the forces that be repeatedly pull them apart, with sometimes years lapsing between meetings, it gets harder and harder to believe either is still carrying the other’s torch.

Then you get into the contradictions and lapses in logic so heady a concept lends itself to. The law that governs the Adjustment Bureau is foggy at best, and though they evidently think nothing of freezing time to manually alter the opinion of Norris’ political advisor, they seem incapable of preventing the divergences Norris himself so frequently propagates. Why not squelch Norris’ irksome infatuation through similar tactics? Elsewhere, the Bureau threatens him with a memory wipe, but repeatedly chooses to reason with him rather than to take more effective action. For as much as they make of their supposedly infallible plan — which looks a lot like the animated Marauder’s Map from Harry Potter — and the omniscience it grants, these celestial shepherds are about as dumb as sheepdogs.

In the belated final act, Norris races toward the mother of all movie climax clichés — the eleventh hour wedding intervention. With his unrequited love set to marry another dude, Norris exploits The Adjustment Bureau‘s two most ridiculous plot devices in order to intervene. First, he scores a magic hat, enabling him to access the subspace network that provides a series of shortcuts throughout New York. Second, he cloaks himself in a rainstorm, which like all water, inexplicably clouds the Bureau’s ability to chart movement.

It’s a shame that The Adjustment Bureau hangs its own proverbial hat on so many ludicrous details. The big questions it poses, while far from new, are well suited for a love story, and the directorial debut of screenwriter George Nolfi shows some promise. Unfortunately it’s the writing that’s at fault here, and while I can’t speak to the source material, Nolfi’s adaptation is rife with questionable choices. Potential squandered, The Adjustment Bureau is cast adrift in sci-fi no man’s land between good intentions and their eye-rolling realization.

“Trust no one with a hat,” Norris is melodramatically advised. “A Yankees cap, even a yarmulke.” No joke, if you can swallow a line like that — hats off. — Colin

SCORE: 2.5 stars





  • Ross F

    I didn’t really mind, but you might wanna give a clearer warning about spoilers. It seems to me you gave a lot away. Like i said I don’t mind, but others might. Thanks for the review.

  • Aaron

    I’m feel pretty much the same about the film as you, Colin. It was passable, but had a lot of potential to be something more.

  • Yvette

    Colin, I think you’ve failed more than the film.

    According to Angelic lore, each hierarchy of Angels only has authority over their specific area. So it makes sense that Richardson didn’t know why Norris and Elise couldn’t be together, only that he had to ‘stop’ them from being together. Think of it this way … Harry and Richardson are worker-bee Angels, though Richardson was clearly Harry’s boss, and Donaldson was Richardson’s boss. Thompson is probably one of the Arch Angels, but even he didn’t know the final will of the Chairman until Harry showed him. In Angel lore, the Angels aren’t all powerful, nor are they perfect, and God has controls on them so he won’t have to suffer through another Lucifer (Angel lore has it that Lucifer was a high ranking Angel in Heaven before his Fall). And didn’t the character Harry say that the Chairman restricts their power to the hats so they won’t get too powerful? Did you miss that? Norris captured it all splendidly. I think this film will do well with adults over 30.

  • Colin

    Yvette,

    I didn’t argue that the bureau hierarchy was nonsensical, I argued that it was uninteresting. To me, a bunch of middlemen (angelic or otherwise) don’t make good movie villains.

    And as to the hats–again, I understand their function was explained, but of all the possible methods by which the chairman could have kept the bureau’s powers in check, mandatory headgear doesn’t seem like the most practical.

  • Paul

    Wish I’d read your review prior to wasting 2 hours last night watching the movie when I could have seen something far better. I couldn’t agree more with you Colin, I thought it was shockingly stupid and boring! The chemistry between the two leads seemed fake to me as well, mostly a product of the terrible writing. I fInd it hard to believe this movie could have gotten made.

  • Nicholas

    so wiping his memory and not becoming president is better than finding love and not becoming president?

    “matt damon”
    -matt damon
    .. team america world police

  • Hugh

    I know that this will probably be rubbish but I’m intrigued by the hats and running around.I’m like a kitten entranced by a ball of wool in relation to this film and consequently I will be at the filmhouse on friday night with my popcorn and pork pie hat.

  • bob

    Lets be honest, this movie is terrible. Everything you said was correct and yet you gave it a 2 1/2? Maybe it had potential but it was never realized. The writing sucked and to me, if you dont have a good story, you have nothing… bad movie. I wish I read this review earlier.