Open Forum Friday: Has 3-D Proven Itself to Be More Than Just a Fad?

It’s been a little over a year now since James Cameron’s Avatar descended on multiplexes and basically altered the direction of the entire movie industry. Up until that point, new 3-D technology was something that a lot of people had been toying with, but it hadn’t been proven to be the future of cinema. After Avatar made over a bajillion dollars, however, everyone was convinced. Now that we’ve had another full year of 3-D releases, the question remains: were we all duped by one good movie or is 3-D still slowly but surely coming into its own?
It seems to me that outside of Avatar, we still haven’t had another killer 3-D experience to back it up. Tron: Legacy was a bit of a let down, and Piranha 3D was fun, but hardly a cinematic revolution. We’ve got Roger Ebert continuing to rally against the format with the argument that our brains simply weren’t made to process these kinds of images, and although sometimes he sounds like an old guy who just doesn’t “get” this newfangled technology, there’s definitely a point where you start thinking that maybe all the issues with 3-D simply aren’t worth the effort.
It would appear that the real test will come in December when both Hugo Cabret and The Adventures of Tintin hit theatres. If Scorsese and Spielberg can’t do something mindblowing with 3-D, then we might as well just throw in the towel. What do you think? Are you still excited about the possibilities that 3-D holds? What post-Avatar movies (if any) have impressed you? Is the technology here to stay or is it still too early to judge? Give us your thoughts here on Open Forum Friday.




































































