House (Hausu) Blu Ray Review

House (Hausu)
Directed by: Nobuhiko Obayashi
Written by: Chiho Katsura
Starring: Kimiko Ikegami, Miki Jinbo, Kumiko Oba, Ai Matsubara

House

Just in time for Halloween, the Criterion Collection has released director Nobuhiko Obayashi’s creepy, cartoony and absurdly hilarious feature film debut House (Hausu) on DVD and Blu Ray. The film is a smorgasbord of in-camera tricks and techniques that celebrate all of the best elements of genre filmmaking while creating a completely unusual and unique cinematic experience.

The synopsis on the back of the House blu ray couldn’t be more appropriate, describing the film as Scooby Doo through the lens of Mario Bava. It’s certainly a colourful experience that probably owes some of its imagery and effects to Italian genre films. To put it into a modern perspective, the film’s aesthetics could be described as a Michel Gondry take on J-Horror. Oddly enough, Hausu was apparently Japan’s direct response to the success of Steven Spielberg’s Jaws, swapping out a man eating shark for a girl eating house! The story is pretty simple; a group of seven girls (a nod to Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai) with unusual names — Melody, Mac, Kung Fu, Fantasy, Prof, Sweetie, Angel — spend their school vacation visiting an ailing aunt in an unusual, creepy house. This leads to each girl being dispatched in progressively more creative and goofy ways, utilizing every possible filmmaking technique in the book: cell animation, stop motion animation, blue screen video effects, and physical make up effects. It all adds up to an indescribable cinematic experience that pushes forward with an infectious energy and a child-like perspective — this due to the fact that Obayashi’s ten year old daughter helped her father come up with some of the concepts, ultimately receiving a credit in the film.

My first thought after finishing House was that Sam Raimi must have been directly influenced by Obayashi’s frenetic mix of humour and horror with his Evil Dead films. They share many similarities, the least of which being the unusual use of camera techniques and special effects. There’s also a great simplicity to the story, painting its characters with broad, cliched strokes. They’re simply pawns used to drive a plot that’s completely dependent upon visual gags and set pieces. It’s actually quite reminiscent of another great genre film that has been given the Criterion treatment; The Equinox. In that film, a young Denis Muren tells a very basic tale of a group of teens that come across an ancient book that unleashes a dark secret (again, similar to Raimi’s Evil Dead). In that film, Muren uses forced perspective photography, stop motion animation, make up effects and a series of other in-camera tricks to create a goofy, low budget adventure that thrives due to a heavy sense passion and creativity. Similarly, House exudes that same creative spirit, allowing the audience a rare look at a brand of pure, unhinged cinematic artistry that might normally be undermined by a fear of going too far. Luckily, Toho Studios let House loose in all of it’s goofy glory, creating a cult sensation that you will definitely want to share with friends.

Criterion’s blu ray release of House is presented in its original 1.33:1 aspect ratio, capturing the vibrant colours and special effects in a faithful, film like transfer. While some might question the benefits of a film like this getting the high definition treatment (by Criterion no less), I think a movie that indulges in so many cinematic techniques deserves a high quality presentation. Unfortunately, the bonus features on this release aren’t as numerous as I’d have imagined they would be. First off is a video interview with director Nobuhiko Obayashi, his daughter Chigumi Obayashi and screenwriter Chiho Katsura. Secondly, there’s Obayashi’s short experimental film Emotion, which gives us an early glimpse at his unusual brand of filmmaking. Finally, Ti West (House of the Devil) shares his thoughts on House. Either way, it’s great just to see a film like this receive a release that’s so attentive to it’s presentation. A true gem that makes me wish Criterion would open its arms to more genre films within its collection.

SCORE: 4 stars



Recommended If You Like: The Evil Dead, Scooby Doo, Ju-on



  • KeithTalent

    Fortuitous timing, Ii just ordered this from Amazon. Sounds like it will be right up my alley.

    Looking at Obayashi’s filmography I don’t believe I’ve seen anything else he has done, but this seems like the perfect starting point. Have you seen any other films by him? If so, any recommendations?

    Thanks for the review.

  • I’m glad you enjoyed this movie, Jay. I saw it almost a year ago, incidentally after you guys reviewed House of The Devil. Looking up House of The Devil somehow lead to me discovering Hausu. I had to download it, but now that I see that there is a copy I can purchase, guess what I’ll be doing. Thanks.

  • joe

    This looks great. I’ll definitely pick it up. Don’t know how I haven’t heard of it (either the movie itself, or the criterion release)

  • I can appreciate the historical significance of this movie, but as an entertainment experience, I found it severely lacking. For film snobs / geeks only.

  • Fatbologna

    Reed,

    This movie doesn’t do enough things you haven’t seen before? Seemed pretty original and creative to me. Although I AM a filmsnobgeek.

  • It was just too ordinary for him I guess. There’s also the fact that Jay liked it.

  • Just saw it a few days ago for the first time and loved it. It’s the cinematic equivalent of looking at a child’s drawing of himself torturing and killing small animals.

    And I like how Reed says it’s for film snobs as if he’s not one.

  • Hausu is a cult film, its hardly for film snobs.

  • Fatbologna

    Matt,

    Thank you. This ain’t no Ozu or Godard shit, yo!

  • Anything that Criterion releases is for film snobs.

    Matt, film geeks like cult films. I guess what I meant to say is that the general public would not like Hausu.

  • Fatbologna

    “Anything that Criterion releases is for film snobs.”

    For someone so smart, you sure are stupid sometimes, Reed.

  • swarez

    So Armageddon and The Rock is for film snobs?

  • Fatbologna

    Apparently so are Robocop, The Killer, Hard Boiled, This is Spinal Tap, Sid and Nancy, Dead Ringers, The Long Good Friday, Flesh for Frankenstein, Blood for Dracula, Time Bandits, Brazil, Life of Brian, Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, Bottle Rocket, Chasing Amy, The Blob, Gimme Shelter, The Beastie Boys Video Anthology, Spartacus, Traffic, Straw Dogs etc, etc, etc…

  • i agree with reed.
    criterion releases artsy fartsy stuff for art fags
    skip hausu and watch evil dead

  • This thing was magnificent when the print came around Toronto! Glad to hear the BLU-Ray is a solid representation of the print.

    I certainly got the Raimi-before-Raimi vibe when watching HAUSU! It’s an eye opener for someone who always thought that Raimi did what he did ‘first’ The two films are certainly complimentary to one another.

  • @fatbologna: I would think that a “smart” person like you would know that everyone is stupid sometimes. And that even a well-informed opinion can be stupid to a stupid person.

    I apologize for generalizing. Even Criterion makes mistakes (or can be stupid sometimes).

  • Fatbologna

    Problem is, Reed, your opinions aren’t often very well informed. You generally just put them out there to get a reaction and for some reason I latch on to your bait every single time so I guess in that respect I am pretty stupid… I should know better than to argue with a guy who doesn’t even seem to like movies in the first place.

  • You’re right, fatbologna. I’ll be more specific. The visual effects are amateurish by today’s standards due to the advent of CGI. The script is bizarre either because of cultural differences or bad translation or poor script to begin with.

    I know there is an audience for this type of film; otherwise, Criterion would not have released it. I am not part of that audience. fatbologna, I am only expressing my subjective opinion of its entertainment value. I consider this whole review to be “baiting” because I’m sure there would be more people who hate this film than like it.

  • fatbologna

    Reed,

    To use the phrasing of a “film snob”, you, Mr. Farrington are a BUMBLING BUFFOON!

    You’re insane. You’re a man on the internet who I’ve never met and for some reason I love you and hate you all at once even though I don’t even know you and with all that said, YOU’RE STILL CRAZIER THAN I AM!

    CGI doesn’t always mean better! Creativity is always more charming than soulless computer work. Guillermo Del Toro, Terry Gilliam, Jean Pierre-Jeunet and countless others have proven this time and time again!

    Watching the amazing and varied effects in this film is one of the most entertaining parts! Your problem is that you see everything from a sterile and technical standpoint. You don’t seem to appreciate artistic value in any way. Just because something isn’t cutting edge doesn’t make it bad. As Jay has said on the podcast, it’s more interesting to see the craftsmanship on display in an older effects film. It’s the reason New Star Wars blows and old Star Wars is beloved by millions.

    As far as the screenplay goes, it’s esoteric because that’s the intent of the entire film. It’s like a child’s ghost story but with a distinctly Japanese flavor.

    I guess saying that kind of stuff is more film geekery/snobbery and I’m only proving your point but if you’re going to look at every film from a quasi-Michael Bay perspective of “more and bigger effects = good” then you’re probably talking to the wrong people with Filmjunk. It’s a MOVIE BLOG! PEOPLE COME HERE TO TALK ABOUT MOVIES!

    When you love film and everything about it, the standard theater fare stops being your gauge for measuring other films. Quality stops being judged by gloss and effects and starts to be judged by imagination and creativity. As I said before, you don’t seem to actually really like movies all that much and you definitely don’t have a passion for film in general so why try to come here and speak for the “general audience” all the time? Generally the people here don’t care what “most people” like or don’t like.

    Jay’s review isn’t baiting anyone except the people who enjoy Filmjunk and most of those folks seem to take his opinion fairly seriously because they understand that he knows his shit and that when he says something’s good it probably is.

    Sorry if that pisses you off…

  • To be fair, Jay likes a lot of shit. Though Hausu is not in that category.

    Also, the effects are amateurish even by the standard of when the film was made. Its an artistic choice to have them that way as it fits with the entire “through the looking glass” concept of the film.

    I’d say the script is bizzare because its Asian, similar to how I chalk up your eating habits and your esoteric fridge to the same genetic issue. ;)

  • @fatbologna: Okay.

  • blah

    reed is a troll
    leave him under the bridge in nilbog where he belongs

    i love criterion
    i own laserdisc copies just to frame and hang over my bed and fap to the box art
    they decide whats quality for me and my art faggy friends
    so shut up reed for being different from us criterion constructed cinematic connoisseurs
    if it aint criterion its crap

  • Fatbologna

    I WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNN!!!!