Hereafter Review

Hereafter
Directed by: Clint Eastwood
Written by: Peter Morgan
Starring: Matt Damon, Cécile de France, Frankie McLaren, George McLaren, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jay Mohr

Hereafter

Clint Eastwood’s past decade as a director has been hit or miss. Along with several Oscar winners and nominations, Eastwood has released several films that seem to hit a growing inconsistent nature. Hereafter continues this inconsistent production style while exploring many of Eastwood’s themes of death and the end of life.

As a victim of a tsunami, Marie Lelay (Cécile de France) is revived after drowning and experiencing a brief encounter with an afterlife. She has trouble returning to a normalcy within her life as television journalist in France. In London, pre-teen English twin boys Marcus and Jason (Frankie and George McLaren) struggle with their mother’s drug-addiction. An unfortunate accident sends a depressed Marcus to live in a foster home where he constantly looks for answers with local faux-psychics. Meanwhile, George Lonnegan (Matt Damon), a former psychic reader who has traded the ideals of exploiting his talent for the life of a factory worker, gets laid off and finds solace in a cooking class where a romance is sparked by classmate Melanie (Bryce Dallas Howard).


Hereafter explores the idea that there is one particular afterlife and that there are a few legitimate psychics who can speak with the deceased. The three protagonists find themselves dealing with several aspects of this romanticized idea of an afterlife from the perspectives of different classes and nationalities.

This is another film where Eastwood explores themes of death. Where Million Dollar Baby dealt with euthanasia, this film explores the idea of an afterlife, albeit with a magical realism spin. While the film hints directly to these three plots converging at one point (London), the motivations behind George’s trip to the city is too convenient, and the viewer is forced to suspend disbelief.

One should always be open to unconventional narrative plot twists, but two particular plot points here offer such jarring accounts and are very odd traits for a film, particularly by a veteran director and storyteller. They have a negative impact on the story, where one particular plot line is never able to fully recover.

Eastwood does shine primarily in the scenes involving Matt Damon and Bryce Dallas Howard. A very convenient meeting between the two quickly turns to one of the more momentous sub-plots within the film, however it is never fully fleshed out. Most of the casting in this film is adequate, with one of the best choices being that of Jay Mohr. His few on-screen moments allow his manipulative nature to be one of the most luring catalysts, who provokes George to reconsider the good times as a profitable psychic.

The digital effects in this film are appalling. The water during the tsunami, and even the overused cliche of a floating teddy bear weakens the high-concept that this film is trying to reach. The film was projected digitally, and the use of deep-focus is not supported by the blocking. Showing everything in the background does not make for a great shot. The crispness of digital cinema is only effective when the director makes use of that space. Showing everything prevents the audience’s eyes from properly being sutured into the narrative.

The film offers several disappointing plot points that could have been much better overall with minimal addition and subtraction to the script. Hereafter had three excellent storylines that never delivered a higher meaning, and the cliches found in the plot and props counteract many of the unconventional choices made in the narrative. Eastwood has certainly found death to be an interesting theme to explore in his later years. Either he is afraid of it, or waiting for it patiently with a shotgun and a can of PBR. — Aaron Weiss


Aaron Weiss is a Graduate Cinema Studies student at the Savannah College of Art and Design and also writes for CinemaFunk.

SCORE: 1.5 stars





  • jack

    GOOD REVIEW BUT U DIDNT SAY WHAT PLOT POINTS U DIDNT LIKE..PLEASE WRITE HAMMER@LIVE.COM.PH

  • Stephan Barkan

    I personally thought the tsunami sequence at the beginning of “Hereafter” was great. It was all the more terrifying because we saw the people being caught up in it. Overall, I also liked the film despite it’s slow pace at times. There were a few scenes that were extremely moving and I had no problem with the ending either. It was great that these three seperate stories converge at the end and Damon finally finds his soul mate. The beautiful Cecil De France! But, I can also see why people wouldn’t like this film. Whatever one thinks about it, there is no other film out there as distinct and unusual as this one.

  • Rick

    Hereafter was excellent. It was not a sci fi thriller, but, it was a sensitive well thought out portayal of what a medium’s life is like and how they deal with their gift.

    See the following “Hereafter” Movie Review – from a Medium’s Point of View for additional information:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sL-VsPeGtI