<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Wahlberg to Star in Feature-Length Version of Sci-Fi Short The Raven</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2010/07/19/mark-wahlberg-to-star-in-feature-length-version-of-sci-fi-short-the-raven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/07/19/mark-wahlberg-to-star-in-feature-length-version-of-sci-fi-short-the-raven/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/07/19/mark-wahlberg-to-star-in-feature-length-version-of-sci-fi-short-the-raven/comment-page-1/#comment-844288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=42584#comment-844288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first I clicked this thinking it was an adaption of the Edgar Allan Poe&#039;s The Raven. And then I saw Mark Wahlberg with a gun and monster and for a second thought the Hollywood Remake crowd had finally lost their minds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I clicked this thinking it was an adaption of the Edgar Allan Poe&#8217;s The Raven. And then I saw Mark Wahlberg with a gun and monster and for a second thought the Hollywood Remake crowd had finally lost their minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deven Science</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/07/19/mark-wahlberg-to-star-in-feature-length-version-of-sci-fi-short-the-raven/comment-page-1/#comment-843110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deven Science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=42584#comment-843110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think they&#039;re being overzealous, and I&#039;ll tell you why. At least these stories are original. They&#039;re not a sequel, a reboot, or a remake. Also, they&#039;re not being made for exploitation (except maybe the exploitation of special effects, which I will now dub &quot;techsploitation&quot;), or mindless blockbuster fodder. Most of these shorts lean more towards art than summer blockbuster. I think this is nothing but a good thing, ultimately. Will all of the movies to come out of this trend be winners? Certainly not, but most will be interesting, many might be good, and none will be Transformers 2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re being overzealous, and I&#8217;ll tell you why. At least these stories are original. They&#8217;re not a sequel, a reboot, or a remake. Also, they&#8217;re not being made for exploitation (except maybe the exploitation of special effects, which I will now dub &#8220;techsploitation&#8221;), or mindless blockbuster fodder. Most of these shorts lean more towards art than summer blockbuster. I think this is nothing but a good thing, ultimately. Will all of the movies to come out of this trend be winners? Certainly not, but most will be interesting, many might be good, and none will be Transformers 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>