Inception Review

Inception
Written and Directed by: Christopher Nolan
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen Page, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Marion Cotillard, Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe, Tom Hardy, Dileep Rao

The holy grail of summer blockbusters is to create a thrilling action movie packed full of special effects set pieces but also backed by a story that is both intelligent and thought-provoking. It’s a delicate balance that is rarely achieved, partially because it is difficult to pull off, and partially because in this day and age, the financial reward is simply not worth the extra effort. You can make just as much (or probably even more) money with dumbed-down, disposable entertainment — which is why we should all thank our lucky stars that there are still filmmakers like Christopher Nolan out there who want to challenge themselves just as much as they want to challenge us.

There aren’t many directors with a track record that allows them to pitch a complicated and completely original concept to a studio and walk away with $200 million to make it. With that kind of price tag, you can be sure that Nolan’s Inception has a lot to live up to, but make no mistake, this movie is worth every penny and then some. There are dazzling visuals and imaginative action sequences, but what makes this film special is the incredibly dense and carefully folded story that envelops the entire production. While Inception may feel like a little too much work for the average viewer, there is still a sense of awe and wonder at every turn, and more than enough excitement to keep hearts racing. For those who also enjoy giving their brain a workout, however, this movie is the ultimate big budget mindbender.

Inception is definitely a movie best enjoyed without very much prior knowledge, and as such, I will offer only the barest of plot summaries. Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a man who makes a questionable living by stealing the innermost secrets of powerful people. He does so by infiltrating their dreams with the help of a team of operatives and a mysterious dream-sharing device. After a failed attempt at extracting information from one business executive (Ken Watanabe), he is offered a job by the very same man. This time, however, must plant information in a competitor’s mind, rather than extract it.

This is arguably Nolan’s first full-blown science-fiction film, but it’s not really as far out as it might seem. He brings his affinity for crime thrillers and mysteries to the mix, ultimately making a heist film with a love story at its core. Aside from the ability to enter dreams, the setting is a near-future world with no discernible difference from our own. Nothing is over-explained, and most of the general concepts are not hard to grasp, it’s just that you have to pay attention. In this way, the movie’s appeal remains fairly broad, and in typical Christopher Nolan fashion the story stays grounded in something familiar.

Watching Inception was, for me, akin to the first time I watched The Matrix, an experience I have been eagerly trying to recapture ever since with very little success. Some of the terminology and concepts instantly harken back to The Matrix, but Inception also quickly separates itself with its subtlety and a different set of rules. Even if you’re not a fan of The Matrix you can at least appreciate the feeling of watching a movie where layers are peeled back to reveal something deeper, and where, unlike most blockbusters, the story never falls apart or sacrifices its own internal logic. Inception is tightly plotted and the rules of the dream world are well-conceived from all angles, holding up under further scrutiny.

Speaking of dreams, Nolan has assembled a dream cast here and they certainly have a hand in elevating the film as well. Leonardo DiCaprio does most of the heavy lifting, and the only unfortunate thing is that there are a lot of similarities between his performance here and his performance earlier this year in Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island. Marion Cotillard has an equally difficult job but is able to match DiCaprio’s intensity while keeping the more emotional moments reined in. Ellen Page finally manages to step out from under the Juno stereotype, playing the young newcomer who is suspicious of Cobb’s motives, while Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Tom Hardy are both somewhat underused dramatically although they do manage to carry out the bulk of the ass-kicking. Then there is Batman alumni Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe and Michael Caine, all of whom are a pleasure to watch. Admittedly, very few supporting characters are truly fleshed out, but the whole movie revolves around Cobb so it only seems appropriate.

The action and special effects are every bit as fantastic and unique as you’ve been led to believe. You hear the word “mind-blowing” thrown around a lot nowadays, but it really does apply here. The fights are never superhuman like in The Matrix, but there are some very interesting scraps in shifting environments and zero gravity. It’s the kind of stuff that makes you wonder, “How the heck did they do that?” There are also some great car chases, shoot outs, and some trippy visuals involving paradoxical environments. If that’s not enough, there is also one sequence reminiscent of a James Bond movie with the team members decked out in matching winter gear and skiis, fighting their way across a snowy landscape. Hans Zimmer’s sinister score pounds itself into your senses to fuel the adrenaline even further.

The one weakness I can see in this film it is that it does feel a bit bloated and unwieldy in the last act. Christopher Nolan doesn’t have many movies that clock in under two hours long, and just like The Dark Knight, there is a general awareness that creeps in at some point that it might be going on a bit longer than necessary. The slow build up to the film’s finale may turn off some viewers, and the levels of recursion may be too much for others, but it lures you back with the prospect of getting even more out of it on repeat viewings.

While it’s true that Inception may not be what everyone is looking for in a summer blockbuster, as far as I’m concerned it is exactly what gets me excited about going to the movies in the first place. Some will say it’s too out there, and others not weird enough, but in that sense it seems to have found the ideal middle ground. It is definitely more of a cerebral experience than an emotional one, but there are very few blockbusters that have ever dared to be this challenging. It is a rare and near-perfect beast, cleverly conceived and executed with precision — one that implants itself in your mind and forces you to contemplate it for weeks afterward. In that way, I suppose this proves that a great film can be the most resilient parasite of all. — Sean

SCORE: 4 stars



Recommended If You Like: The Matrix, Shutter Island, The Dark Knight



  • Ken

    Nice!

  • going at 4:30 can’t wait!!!! please GOD save my summer!!!

  • Gary Wolcott (mr. Movie) gave inception 2/5
    Frederic and his wife Mary Ann Brussat gave it 2/5 as well..

    And thats how a movie drops 10% on RT..

  • bard

    The very few nitpicks I have with this movie are completely overshadowed by the good things that this movie has. I would give it a 4/4 as well. Definitely Nolan’s best work.

  • 1138

    I agree with rus in chicago…Inception save my summer too! Can’t wait to see it this Sunday!!

  • Mike

    Yo sean, I saw the film last night and I think it definitely lived up to the hype but, in a sense, over lived the hype. I think it might have done too much, especially in the first act. It initially feels claustrophobic as it forces all this information on the viewer. I definitely would not label myself as an “average” viewer as you put it either. I feel like if Nolan eased the audience into the same exact dense world, the film might have been more successful, especially at constructing a more convincing character driven narrative. With that is my only other problem, the relationships between the characters. More could have been done to help the audience empathize with Cobb’s character by understanding the reality of the situation. I plan on seeing it again, just so I can be confident about my understanding of the film, but it truly is an excellent film.

  • Christopher Nolan is asserting himself as one of the premier writer/directors of the past 10 years. Inception is a complex and ultimatly rewarding journey into a new and unique world. The concepts may be familiar to some, but it sets it’s boundaries apart from such films as the Matrix or Dark City. It’s simply one of the most unique films I have ever seen. One word to decsribe this film is “layers”. Layers upon layers upon layers…

    The character development and resolution of DiCaprio’s Dom Cobb is expertly written by Nolan, and kudos to Leonardo’s performance as well. Marion Cotillard’s performance as Mol was equally outstanding and the chemistry between her and DiCaprio was suprisingly good.

    Best film of the year so far IMO. 4/4 and then some.

  • Saw this this morning. Leo has just about mastered disguising what a bad actor he is. Aside from that, god, so many images from this are playing over in my mind. Can’t wait to see it again.

    Loved the style of it too, though I thought Leo, and some of the others (esp Cillian Murphy) were like Nolan surrogates in how they looked; the hair, the clothing…

  • I was wondering through the whole film if Mr. Nolan ever had an actual dream…It sure doesn’t seem like it.

  • antho42

    Spoilers:

    The more I think about it, the end makes perfect sense. It was a dream, all along. The clue is the images of his kids. Throughout the film, the same exact memory persist…even in the final sequence–it is the same memory. It is near impossible for his kids to be in the exact position.

    I do not think it nullifies the film. The way I see it–the film is about the suppression of one’s guilty subconscious. Cobbs’ subconsciously constructed the scenario, in order to fully mask his inner guilt, so that he can fully embrace the dream world. It is a very delusional and bleak ending.

  • If you dream alot like I do this movie is going to make wonder who is playing with your mind.

  • Its a very good film and like Sean said, it is an example of what true movie freaks look to discover, now and then, at the cinema.

    To watch this film you need to be prepared to pay attention almost as much as you did the first time you watched Memento.

    Nolan did recreate the feel of The Matrix. That’s interesting, I can attest to the frustrating feelings The Matrix has caused screenwriters over the years. I can personally tell of times were I was working on a sci-fi idea only to stop and realize I was remaking The Matrix!? The appeal and dominance The Matrix has over the genre (and Nolan positively recaptures here) is a system were the human characters can be jeopardy but not really, therefore, allowing superhuman danger and action.

    I would be lying if I didn’t say I fear for the future of this film; in my showing there were actual people that walked out! I’ve never seen people walk out of a film because it was TO intense or mindbending.

    Hear me out, in that way this film is like “Lady in the Water”; a powerful director gets a very artful and cerebral film greenlit for a HUGE production and marketing budget that the film’s inherent audience can’t support. I hope, hope, hope, I’m wrong but if this doesn’t do really well after the first week on “word of mouth” it will hurt Nolan’s and other directors ability to get these type films greenlit. I feel its a double edged sword were these films need a huge budget for production but with that budget they get compared with Shrek and T2! I don’t know, guess I worry to much…

    OK SPOILER AND SOMETHING I’D LIKE THE GUYS TO DISCUSS IN THE PODCAST:

    The one scene I had a real problem with and need some help analyzing is the warehouse scene after the team first encounters Fischer’s projections. If you remember, it was the scene were they start “pointing fingers” and have a “we’re f*cked” moment. Now I completely understand why the scene is constructed the way it is; its a scene to “turn-the-tables” on our heroes because up to that point everything has been going very smoothly for them and Nolan needs to put them in immediate jeopardy early in the dream sharing. The problem I have is the scene is literally only half-developed and undercuts the logic Nolan has set-up. In the arguing back-and-forth we learn that the team members have kept information from each other (specifically Cobb) and they can “die” inside the dream, or, be suspended in “limbo” I believe – its implied this is really bad to the characters true physical self. Now I know Nolan needs to put this uber cool team at risk, but this undercuts the fact that earlier he established you can’t “die” inside the dram sharing.

    ((Nolan has that great scene were he establishes pain is felt in dreams, so I expected a Morpheus type torture scene, yet this idea was never developed))

    It also makes no sense why the team members, other than Cobb, would go forward after this point. If the team members find out they are in a “no-win situation” why would they risk their lives over just money. I guess that’s what the scene needed; more obvious feeling of greed on part of the secondary team members to show motivation for going further. Am I missing something? Could they not get out before the “kick”, did they have to stay to save Saito (doesn’t make sense as he isn’t a long time friend)?

    Anyway, good film, the other issues I’ll wait to hear about in the podcast, such as, the ending and if Cobb ever really left his deep subconscious???!!!

  • alechs

    SPOILERS:

    Rus, I am not sure if you caught the bit about the only alternative way to escape the dream would be to wait it out for roughly a week (which apparently according to Cobbs is impossible) until the drugs wore off in real time. Kicking prematurely as not possible (because there would be no third party in real time) and death takes you to limbo.

    Basically this is what I think happened (from what I remember – don’t quote me on this):
    1) The falling was a failsafe.
    2) Yusef, I don’t remember him emerging out of the water or not but if he didn’t, was kicked back to reality on schedule by an airtendant when the van hit the guard rail.
    3) Yusef proceeds to kick everyone back into reality right after he wakes. Because of the time differences between dream states you can still have that dialogue bit near the end of the film before Yusef wakes everyone up.

    I think the motivational for the group was to avoid being stuck in the limbo state which I gather is more akin to being a living vegetable in the real world. I believe Saito relationship in the end only directly applied to Cobbs but potentially could have affected the lives of everyone involved (aka hunted down for endangering his life: remember what happened the Lucas Haas character?).

  • SPOILERS
    that makes some sense, I did miss the line you spoke of as I was starving during the film – not a good idea for this one boys!

    but in your response you think one of the attendants on the plane pulled Yusef out…hmmm, I’m confused on the whole what attendants see etc. In the beginning of the film JGL is actively monitoring what is going on with Cobb and kicks him out. Yet at the end we are suppose to think the attendants would not be there to pull them out of danger?! wait, when JGL pulls Cobb out in the beginning scene we learn THAT scene is another dream – FUCK THIS MOVIE!!!

  • SPOILERS
    o.k. let me work thru this:

    page uses falling as a fail safe to kick herself up a level out of limbo.

    the destruction of the tower creates a fall that kicks those active members to the hotel.

    the elevator “faked fall” kicks them back to the van

    the falling into water kicks those dreamers in the van back, which is weird because they show them getting oxygen masks that where put in the van?! isn’t the goal just to have the water kick them back a level????

    so can attendants pull them out or not? JGLs character did at the beginning?

  • Antho24

    Rus in Chicago; Spoilers:
    The limbo angle came about, since the team was using a different, experimental procedure, in order to achieve multiple dream levels.

    The team members were force to go further, due to the reason that they will remain stuck in the dream for about a week. In a week, they would not be able to survive the attacks of the projectors. Therefore, the only way to escape quickly– is to do the inception. Doing the inception–takes them out of the dream without waiting for a week.

  • alechs

    Spoilers:

    This bit is for the recent comments section on the sidebar so that people scrolling through the website don’t accidentally see any key words. I hope this is a sufficient buffer.

    Yeah, Japanese kid reading manga was the real person to initiate the final kick back on the train after the South American(?) revolt.

    We haven’t even gotten into the mechanics of the limbo state. I really hope that the Creative Screenwriting podcast can wrangle Nolan down for Q&A or an interview or something to clear this stuff out. There are way too many moments wherein the rules of the film are broken – the end is a clear example of that.

    As for the final scene… I just didn’t care – it was the best suitable ending. Judging from the Nolan films I have seen I would venture Cobbs didn’t make it back and was trapped in the his subconscious. The nihilistic tone of all his other films, particularly The Dark Knight, kind of carry through here.

  • Drewsifer

    My brain testicles blew my load like Paul Ruebens in the theatre when I watched this.

  • Bryan

    I want to go to the basement of Reed’s brain.

  • Antho24

    Original posted on Twitchiflm
    Inspire by Kurt’s review, my spoiler free review:

    From the moment that Spielberg scared millions of people from swimming in the ocean: the blockbuster has become Hollywood’s bread and butter. From the late 70’s to the new millennium, most of Hollywood’s theatrical releases– primarily caters to the fanboy/adolescent audience. Gone are the days, that the adult audience is the target demographic for Hollywood; nowadays– for the most part– adult theme films are confined to the independent and to the foreign film scene. The absence of adult oriented blockbusters, usually means that most of the mainstream films are either mindless entertainment and/or do not dare venturing in material that is provocative, controversial, or profound.
    Despite the dominance of low brow blockbusters… once in awhile, emerge blockbusters that blur the line between the blockbuster and the art house. Films such as Children of Men, Collateral, and Zodiac are adult, art house films with both a bigger budget and a more widespread theatrical release.
    Ever since making an impact in film festivals with Following and primarily with Memento, Christopher Nolan has been able to work in the Hollywood system, while still managing to churn out films that are aim at an adult audience. Does Inception continue Nolan’s trend of mixing the art house with the blockbuster? Well… not really. “Not really”? Is the answer yes or no?
    Inception’s major weakness is that it leans more towards the blockbuster side than the art house side. Yes, the film has an unorthodox structure and has creative, original sequences. Yet, it leans more towards the blockbuster– due to its inability to both venture and dwell on the story’s darker aspects and on being subtle when addressing its rules. In other words, Inception is too afraid of offending a large segment of the audience; the film spends too much time with exposition and with bombastic, action sequences than with dealing with the protagonist’s existential crisis and with the philosophical implications of both the technology and the moral practice surrounding dream espionage and voyeurism.
    It does not mean that film should be avoided. On the contrary, the film is a tour de force blockbuster. The acting is great, especially Tom Hardy: who overshadows the other actors. Wally Pfister continues his trend of delivering a recognizable, gorgeous cinematography. Hans Zimmer’s score is fantastic…although, the film could have a deliver a better sound design (on many occasions, it is difficult to discern the dialogue). Unlike The Dark Knight, most of the action sequences are top class; the hotel, action sequence is mind-blowing. Overall, it is a well made blockbuster– but it is not a masterpiece, and therefore, nowhere near the top of Nolan’s filmography .
    Inception’s problem is not whether it is good or bad; Inception’s problem is that it could have been a masterpiece. Instead of simply being on par with The Matrix, Inception had the potential of being Crime and Punishment in the dream world.
    Rating: 8 out 10

  • Jonny Ashley

    Spoilers:

    Great pacing, the way that they unravel the rules of the dream-surfing was subtle and effective. I love the fact that it begins firstly with a dream within a dream, it takes out all the cheesy gimmicky-ness of saving it till the end to use as a cheap twist. Noland is basically telling you right off the bat, don’t trust reality, I am going to fuck with your head.

  • Justice

    I definitely loved this movie and it is the best movie I’ve seen this year and best thriller in a long long time. But there were some minor issues. Jay talks about hating exposition and there was a ton of it in this movie, sometimes explaining things that were meaningless except for a tiny payoff later on (such as the scene where page and the jgl creat an escher-esque staircase only to allow for a clever escape/kill later). This leads to the movie feeling a little long, though once the final heist begins it doesn’t matter because its so fun to watch. Page in general felt a bit superflous. She impressed leo by making a maze and was asked to design the dreamscapes as mazes however I never once got the impression the dreams were labyrinthian. It never would have mattered if I didn’t know that so just cut the talking and let us get to the meat and potatoes of the heist itself. I love DiCaprio but this is EXACLTY the same character as shutter island. But he does it well and is excellent in both.

    The editing was amazing, particularly when dealing with the various time distortions within the levels.

  • Manuel

    I watched it when it was released and absolutely loved it. The effects, the fighting, and most of all,the story and how it is revealed. It was so great and mind blowing. I did seem to easily follow the story and dreams. I keep hearing that you should watch it multiple times but it didn’t seem necessary. That doesn’t change the fact that I will watch it again. I will again and maybe even a third time. Great movie. 5 out of 5 stars

  • Niklas

    I’d give this a 3/5

    I liked a lot of things about this movie besides the concept.. which is not really Nolan’s or any of the actors fault. I just don’t like movies about dreams but I thought this would change my mind and it almost did..

  • Isn’t Nolan’s depiction of dreams the polar opposite of what dreams actually are? Dreaming in Inception is a chore – ridiculous rules keep piling up until nightly fantasies morph into a more regulated version of daily life. Most of the rules also seem to be set-up to resolve narrative dead ends rather than to build a compelling universe. And what lifeless “characters”! The main guy gets to shift between two emotions: culpability and melancholy, while the rest of his team is literally devoid of anything resembling personality or emotion. Even Ellen Page’s neophyte, who discovers Nolan’s dreams with us, seems incapable of awe. Since most of the film consists of verbal interactions between the team members, a bit of personality clash, a sense of unity and collaboration, or at least some group dynamic would’ve rendered the experience a little less sterile. Humor, maybe? The numerous conversations are generally directed in the traditional, boring modern Hollywood form: establishing shot -> close up of the person who is talking -> a couple of reaction shots if what has been said is relevant to the plot (and it always is).

    Nolan has gained a bit of visual coherance since his last film but his main action set-piece (the snowy mountain thing) is still an unexciting series of random shots of machine guns firing in every directions. Ah, just think what Brian De Palma could have done with it!

  • Also, am I the only one who thinks Gordon-Levitt looked like a kid who stole his daddy’s clothes?

  • @20 Great insights. You saw a few things I did not. That being said, many people will not notice the art house deficiencies. You’re right, the film could have gone in a completely different and dark direction but didn’t. Oh well, its still great though. And will be hard to be topped. Looked the score to the film. Frak was that good. Tom Hardy did out act many of the other characters in the film but he was given better lines to say.

    Inception COMIC BOOK PREQUEL: The Cobol Job
    http://film-book.com/inception-comic-book-prequel-the-cobol-job/

  • 1978

    I thought the movie was great. Beautifully shot. Great action. And it was fun to feel like you were learning something about the world he created – dream physics.

    I find it interesting that no one here has actually said anything about the direct steals (almost shot for shot) from both Solaris and 2001. That was a bit bothersome for me. Rather than re-interpret scenes and shots from 2 of the greatest sci-fi movies ever to use as inspiration, he almost exactly replicated them.

    Still great movie overall but definitely not on par with The Matrix.

  • Fatbologna

    Antho24,

    I think the criticism of the film being too much Blockbuster and not enough art house is misguided. When a studio gives a director 200 million dollars there’s a major expectation that the film will appeal to at least 250-300 million dollars worth of movie goers. The fact that the film has the amount of cerebral elements it does is a feat in itself. I think there’s a pretty prefect blend of both action and ideas that keep the movie entertaining and pacier than the first act initially implies.

    Maxime Gérin,

    You seem to think that this was going to be a Tim Burton or Terry Gilliam dream film. It’s a Nolan dream film. It’s EXACTLY what you expect his dreams probably look like. He’s a realist. His mind is compartmentalized and organized to the point of obsessive compulsion. To expect a surrealist presentation from a man like Nolan is foolish. He is who he is and he presents his films from his own perspective. That perspective being firmly grounded in logic and reality even when dealing with subjects that could be seen in an illogical or surreal way.

  • Fatbologna

    1978,

    Inception’s better than The Matrix. That movie is so grounded in lame 90s-era, Eurotrash, BDSM, Anime-tinged nonsense it’s next to impossible to take seriously. There’s a reason the Wachowskis haven’t done so well this decade and Nolan has. Nolan has real vision and style while the Wachowskis have other people’s visions and style put through a creepy bondage filter.

  • I agree with Fatbologna on the type and look of the dreams. 100 directors doing this script would produce a 100 versions of dreamscapes to play in. you can dislike the outcome but the decision is valid. I’m not completely sure if Nolan used a very architectural and tailored suit dreamscapes as a way to keep a “clean” work space (story space) or he is a germ-a-phobe, ha haw! Each one of his films gets more and more clean!!

    I think if this film had dreamscapes that looked like something out of “What Dreams May Come” or “Bettlejuice” it would not be satisfying to the majority of viewers.

  • oh, and Nolan really shows his colonial British side in the look and style – the Seville Row suits and locations/sets (particularly the chemist local) that call back to The British Empire! He does The Queen Mum proud!

  • @Bryan: The basement of my brain is filled with sewage.

    @Antho24: Regarding the sound design, you should either blame your theater’s sound system or your hearing. I remember one instance where Ariadne yells something over the sound of an explosion. I thought that was realistic, and it wasn’t really important to hear what she said anyway. The theater I was in had a problem with the heavy bass in one scene. I did have a problem with Ken Watanabe’s accent at times.

  • Mason

    Reed, I’m curious what you thought of the sci-fi technology in the movie and how it was presented. The way I see it the devices they used to be in each other’s dreams and be architects of their physicality only had to work to get into the first level. On each subsequent level, the devices work because they believe they will work. Right? Unless I missed some exposition somewhere.

    I loved the movie, and I’m glad I chose to see it on the big screen. Nolan’s storytelling is superb. He deserves some accolades for this original screenplay. It made me think of The Saragossa Manuscript somewhat, but instead of stories being told within stories that are within stories (and so on), we have dreams within dreams within dreams. Different, but it made my brain work in a similar way.

  • I am definitely going to be seeing this movie ASAP! Dark Night and Memento were such intriguing thrillers; they gave me high expectations for this movie. From what I’ve been reading, it looks like it is going to live up to my expectations. Can’t wait to see what Christopher Nolan has done in this film!

  • froggiegirl0

    Such a dense story and eyeball melting visuals that I could not take a bathroom break even though I’m 8 months pregnant. Thankfully fetus was not in a bladder kicking mood.
    As someone with a fashion design degree I loved loved LOVED all men in suits. Ken Watanabe’s dinner ensemble almost made me swoon. OK enough geeking out about fashion.

    While I think the story line did not make me feel all that sympathetic to DiCaprio’s desire to go home, I wouldn’t dock the movie points for that. The complex world of dreams more than makes up for it in my opinion. Can’t wait to watch the movie again.

  • Kabrizzle

    This movie made my noggin-box go “POOF”

    Then I watched the Matrix and it put itself together again.

    Then I watched the Matrix Reloaded and I died a little on the inside.

  • Jim

    Boring characters, who cared. Too much time wasted on gun battles. If this new head of the world’s largest energy conglomerate was so important, why does he travel without security. Beyond great effects, interesting story concept; but just a bunch of noise. If you want to stand on the bridge where the floating houses were go to the DWP headquarters downtown LA next to the music center. The spiral stairs and elevators featured are inside, just say you are going to the cafeteria on the lower level.

  • Antho24

    http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/inceptions_dileep_rao_answers.html

    Inception’s Dileep Rao Answers All Your Questions About Inception

    Over the weekend, Christopher Nolan’s mind-bending Inception extracted $60.4 million from moviegoers, many of whom probably have no idea what hit them. Where to turn for answers? Today, Vulture had the pleasure of speaking with Dileep Rao, who plays Yusuf the chemist in the film (he’s also in Avatar, which makes him, in terms of box-office bankability, the Indian Will Smith). Rao helpfully revealed everything he knows — and thinks he knows — about Inception’s story. SPOILERS ahead, obviously.

    Let’s get the easy stuff out of the way first. Can you go over the rules of dreaming?
    When you dream normally, you can use a drug to share the dream with other people. You can enter another person’s dream. It’s just the dream-sharing drug, so if you die in that dream, you just wake up — no problem. It’s frightening for a second, but up you come. The problem arises when you want to go deeper. To go deeper, we have to use a much stronger version of the drug, one that my character customizes, that is combined with a very powerful sedative. It’s like weights to keep you under when you are scuba diving. But in this situation, if you die in the dream, you go deeper and deeper until you hit limbo.

    Limbo is unconstructed dream space, unless one of the dreamers has been there — in our movie’s case, someone has. And while you’re in limbo, your brain can be destroyed. Like, you would be in a coma, or you could just leave your mind behind.

    Also, you can be in limbo for years and years, subjective limbo time, but in reality only moments have passed.
    Yes, a lifetime can go by, because each layer is 10 times dilated by going into a dream within a dream within a dream. Um, within a dream.

    Digging a little deeper now into the story now, can you walk me through whose dream is whose?
    Okay. So first there’s reality. We get on the plane. We go to sleep. Then we’re in my dream, Yusuf’s dream. Because my pee urge causes it to rain. That’s how I see it. The architecture is Ariadne’s (Ellen Page’s) design, but it’s my dream. Then we drop down a level and go to the bar, to the hotel. I think we’re in Arthur’s (Joseph Gorden-Levitt’s) dream at that point. Then — this is where it gets mind-bending — we drop down into Fischer’s (Cillian Murphy’s) dream, even though he thinks they’re going to Browning’s (Tom Berenger’s) dream.

    There seems to be a rule of thumb, then, that whoever “sticks around” in a level, that person had to be the dreamer, right? It’s why you’re stuck driving the van and Joseph Gordon-Levitt chills out in the hotel.
    I think that’s a great signifier and it makes the most sense, because how the hell would it continue on that level if the person who was dreaming took off?

    But that made me think the third level, the snow fort, was Eames’ (Tom Hardy’s) dream.
    Except in the hotel room, Ellen Page asks whose subconscious we’re going into, and Cobb answers, “Fischer’s.”

    You’re right, it has to be Fischer’s, because that’s the level where they’re planning to do the inception. That also means that in the hotel room, when Browning is talking to Fischer, we’re actually watching —
    — an internal debate going on in Fischer’s mind. He’s filling Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s dream with his subconscious. And then one level down, in the snow of his own mind, he drops down to limbo when he dies, which means your rule of thumb isn’t quite right. Because Mal shoots him, which mean’s Cobb’s own subconscious has taken Fischer to limbo.

    So how do Leo and Ellen Page get to limbo?
    They open up a suitcase and they lie down on the floor, and go under. It’s a limbo party now — who can go lower? — because Ken Watanabe is on his way down there soon, too.

    So if it’s a limbo party, it seems like limbo is a shared creative space, in a sense?
    Right. Limbo is like unconstructed dream space. Nothing exists, except whatever has been constructed previously in the subconscious by any of the dreamers in the dream. Among our characters, Leo is the only one who’s been there.

    I think a lot of people are confused by the ending/beginning where Ken Watanabe is an old man in limbo, but Leo is still super handsome.
    Well, two ideas. One: Leo is aged too, but he’s been down there less time and from a younger age. Cobb is in his forties and Saito in the eighties by the time they meet.

    Is there anything to the idea that Leo knows he’s in limbo?
    Well that’s option two: He knows where he is, so he can keep track a bit better of where he is, who he is.

    Ellen Page warns him something along those lines just before she leaves him in limbo…
    But Leo also starts out younger. In fact, he looks even younger in real life than as Cobb in the film. He looks so young!

    I kept thinking about how much he looks like Bizarro Chris Nolan.
    He does! It’s weird.

    And if movies are the director’s dream, that means Leo as Nolan is…
    Stop.

    Okay, well, can you explain how totems work?
    The behavior of the object is subject to rules it follows in real life, but your having made it in secret means that it will tell you if you’re in reality. Like you in your dream, have it behave in an unreal way. So the top will keep spinning forever if Cobb is in a dream. He chose the top because it was Mal’s. One, it’s a deep symbolic connection to her, and the idea he planted in her on purpose that she brought back up into reality. And, two, he knows it represents getting trapped in non-reality so it’s an extra-strong totem. (That second part is my speculation.)

    Oh good, because I want to get really speculative later. But first, as the chemist who invented the sedative, why is it important to synchronize the kicks, the triggers to wake you up?
    Well here’s the key: You want to wake all the way up, because if you don’t, you can’t go back up to rekick and wake yourself up. The sedative leaves inner-ear function unimpaired, so you have to feel a jolt in the level you’re asleep in to wake from the level below. If the synchronized kick fails, you would only wake up where it reached you. It’s like a concussive wave. It has to reach all the way down, or else you have to get lucky for some other kick, or for someone who’s awake to wake the other person up. So, I transmit a kick down to the Arthur, he transmits it below, and so on.

    Hence at the top level, the van has the failsafe kick of falling and hitting the water?
    Right. And above that, in reality, the drug is fed by a machine that turns off. It has a timer on it and the sedative has to stop flowing. That’s the one that’s real.

    So at the end when they’re sitting on the riverbank in Yusuf’s dream, it’s no big deal because they’re not going to have to sit around too long…
    Sure, but if you miss a kick and you’re down below, you won’t wake up. You’ll disappear into that level, or go to limbo, because you can’t wake up. Or you can and your mind might not come back because subjectively you’ve been there too long. That’s the danger.

    Any thoughts on how Cobb and Mal ended up in limbo way back when?
    Personal experimentation, to test the limits of the art, and I think that’s kind of the interesting and haunting thing about it, is that they stretched their full limits and found a material weakness in the process, and his way of fixing it ended up snapping back up from the benthic depths with her, into reality, and had her utterly flummoxed. She lost her mind, her touch with reality, and she did the unthinkable. Because, remember, she’s been dealing with the passage of levels the whole time, so reality just felt like another, since she spent her whole life down there with Leo. They grew old together.

    I used to have this dream, or rather, this idea, that I’d just wake up at some point and I would be four years old again. And this life was just one trajectory my life could have gone on. But that’s the thing that Mal got messed up by, because she lived so long on the lower level. Like, for me, how could waking up as a four-year-old seem real — jibe with what I’ve experienced as real? How do you believe in it, right?

    So what about the final shot, when the top seems like it could keep spinning before we cut to black. Let’s call it the n-1 theory, where the whole film is all a dream, even the “reality” level. In other words, every level is one lower than we think it is.
    Yeah. I don’t think “It’s all a dream” theory makes much sense to me, because where is “the real” Cobb? We never see n. We never see reality. We have no idea who this man is, what his circumstances are. To me, there’s really only two paths: either it’s a wobbling top, which it does sound like at the end, and it’s real; or the whole thing, regardless of totems, moments, girls, children, people, machines, the whole thing — it’s all some dream. And that’s more philosophy. I think the film does this wonderful exploration of the entire idea to the nth degree. It feels so full. Because of that, there’s so many weird bits that seem to warp our sense of the real and unreal.

    I felt a very dreamlike feeling when Cobb is being chased by the Cobol guys and Ken Watanabe shows up to save him. I mean, squeezing through the wall when they’re coming for him, I’ve had so many nightmares like that.
    Archetypes. We all dream in certain ways. Teeth falling out, being chased… and that stuff is poignant. But the more you explore it, the more you realize that Chris has already thought about it. I think there is a definitive answer, but it’s hidden so you have to take time to think about it. But I do think it’s real because it’s an Apostatic act on art itself to suddenly say “Well none of this happened, and I have no explanation.”

    What if Leo is the one being “incepted” with an idea? We keep hearing the phrase “Do you want to become an old man, filled with regret?” and it’s like someone — maybe Ellen Page’s character because she’s the catalyst of his emotional catharsis — has set this all up so he can let go of his regret over Mal’s death. That’s why at the end with Saito he offers to come back and be young again (not old, full of regret). Even the Edith Piaf song they use to signal ten seconds before kick translates to “No, I regret nothing.” And there’s so many scenes where Ellen Page is talking to Leo, getting him to reveal his issues, in the same way that Eames tricks Fischer into revealing his issues. Also, Leo’s kids are the same age at the end, right?
    I’m not trying to be authoritative, so this is just my understanding of how I approached it from my work on it. But you’re saying it’s like some sort of crazy-ass psychotherapy session where the whole thing is a constructed narrative of massive complexity only to distract Cobb so that he will achieve his change? I mean sure, you could totally say that that’s what it is. In a way, that’s what we’re doing to Fischer, so it’s not unfounded.

    The problem for me is that you’re using negative evidence to support a story that isn’t there. I don’t know what to say about a character who only exists before and after the movie. You’re talking about a character who isn’t on screen. And I mean on one hand, it’s awesome that this movie can sustain that kind of discussion. It shows you just how well-though-through and comprehensive it is, but I mean I don’t know where that kind of speculation ends. It’s like people who are convinced 9/11 is an inside job. It’s a mental heuristic failure to think that one or two minor details explain absolutely everything. I mean, kids wear the same clothes all the time.

    To me, it’s a far more elegant story if it’s a vast job that Leo has to pull off. The threat is real, the growth is real, the adversary is real. The weakness of “It’s all a dream” — why we hate that, why we feel cheated when narratively anything is revealed to be all a dream — is that you’ve just asked me to spend so much time and emotional capital investing in the stakes of this, and you’ve now swept it away with the most anti-narrative structuralism that doesn’t have anything to substitute in its place. It’s laughing at you for even taking it seriously. You don’t want to feel like a victim of the narrative, and I don’t think Christopher Nolan would do that.

    For me, though, this film could say “It’s all a dream” and I would feel even more satisfied. Because the premise is “through a very complex dream, we can enact real change in a character.” All of the sudden it’s not a fake-out bullsh*t journey, if that’s the case. In other words, if I’m satisfied by the success of Fischer’s transformation, then Leo’s growth is just as satisfying.
    But he doesn’t have to be dreaming for that growth. If, by way of example, in the last scene where Cobb ran off to hug his kids, there were a reflection of Mal in the window? That would make it far more vague and I’d say, sure. But that’s not there.

    Close your eyes and listen to the sound at the end. I really do think the top wobbles and that it’s real. Cobb does go on a journey, because that’s what movies are, and I think that’s what leads audiences to this kind of speculation. Because of the story he chose to tell, Nolan is also commenting on the nature of stories themselves, all stories, which is why Leo’s change can’t be evidence that it’s all a dream.

    To me, the real story all boils down to Saito’s line in the helicopter. Leo wants to go home and see his kids. Saito says, “I can help you, but it’ll have to be an act of faith.” Leo has to trust Saito, and he does this while putting total faith in himself and the team, and everything goes apesh*t wrong, but he has to believe that if he does the job, Saito will do what he promised. And they’ve grown, they’ve become friends, which is why Leo says “Come back and let’s be young men together.” Leo’s follow-through on that act of faith is his transformation. He becomes a person who can take a chance.

    There’s also kind of a beautiful negative symmetry between that leap of faith, and Mal begging him to make a similar leap of faith. After he did that with her, and the guilt plagues him, he can’t function any more. He’s exploring his memories in a dangerous unhealthy way, and he’s going to let that go by the time the movie’s over.

    Everyone’s so concerned about whether the top falls or not, but no one seems to care that Leo walked away without caring. The moment he sees their face, he can walk away. That’s testimony to the fact that he’s gained that faith.

    Related: The Hidden ‘Inception’ Within Inception
    Your Box Office Explained: Inception Blow

  • Slix

    Great review Sean.
    All I’ll say about this movie is that it succeeds where Shutter Island failed, IMO.

  • Fatbologna,

    At no point in my comments am I craving for delirious sets or extravagant costumes, which is what Burton or Gilliam would’ve dressed this film with. I’m not attacking Nolan’s visual design of dreams (although really, his vision of an idyllic fantasy created by a loving couple looks excessively cold to me) and I’m fully aware that dreams can represent two people chatting in a living room, but they always feature something off, something that wouldn’t make sense in reality – be it the rhythm, the logic, a sudden unexplained event… What’s the purpose building a film around dreams if you’re not interested in what makes dreams…dreams? To me, the whole structure of the film is deficient and at odds with the subject matter.

    Also, Nolan is a realist? Really? He’s obviously more interested in bombast and spectacle than realism. Wouldn’t a realist grant more attention to his characters and their interplay?

  • Fatbologna

    The whole point of the movie was that Leo and his crew’s job was to infiltrate people’s dreams and architecturally create a believable reality to the person dreaming. The dreamer was meant to believe they were still awake and his team was there to facilitate that. That was the whole purpose of the architect and why Ellen Page’s character was so important, ya dig?

    Any inconsistencies would tip the person off to the fact that they were dreaming, thus no surrealist bullshit.

  • Maxime Gérin – I agree we mostly remember weird dreams but I for one just awoke from a loooooong dream dealing with a alcoholic family member and an unfulfilled birthday promise, very real and very boring. I personally believe 90% of our dreams are working thru the vast amounts of information in our brains…

    I like your spirit and do agree that the lowest level, dreamscape created between Cobb and Maul was very cold, especially if it is a testament to their love…but I don’t think you really want what you are after. I think the look of the dreams are a reflection of Nolan’s taste but it also serves the storytelling, here’s a great quote from this month’s American Cinematographer: (DP Pfischer and Nolan)

    As with so many of their ventures, the touchstone for Nolan and Pfister was photographic realism. “The underlying idea is that dreams feel real while we are in them, which is actually a line in the film, ” says Nolan, “That was important to the photography and to every aspect of the film. We didn’t want to have dream sequences with any superfluous surrealism. We didn’t want them to have any less validity than what is specified as being real world. So we took the approach of trying to make them feel real. There are times when the characters didn’t know what they’re seeing is a dream, so the visual difference between reality and dreams had to be seamless, except in specific places where we wanted to communicate that difference to the audience. Often the surrealism in the movie comes from the environment rather than the camerawork. By maintaining a realistic feel, we believed we could introduce a bizarre or unsettling feel very subtly when we wanted to, without taking the viewer out of the story.”

    I think the last part of that quote is important, you need to remember the audience also needs to not know what is a dream and what is not. If Nolan was overly surreal a level of enjoyment and engagement with the audience would be lost. Likewise, with such a complex story, visual confusion would make the film even more confusing to the majority of the audience. I think Nolan made the right choice, but I still agree with you that the lowest level could have been more surreal.

  • I’m fully aware that dreams can represent two people chatting in a living room, but they always feature something off, something that wouldn’t make sense in reality

    Its impossible for you to make this claim.

  • @ Fatbologna,

    Yes but, this idea doesn’t make sense to me. However strange and out there my dreams get, I never become aware that I’m dreaming – that’s just not how it works. This is what I meant earlier when I said that “most of the rules also seem to be set-up to resolve narrative dead ends rather than to build a compelling universe”; Nolan does not adjust his mise en scene or his storytelling to his subject matter, he modifies the very concept and notion of dream to fit his conventional narrative and filmmaking.

    @ rus in chicago

    “I personally believe 90% of our dreams are working thru the vast amounts of information in our brains…”

    Yes, without being an expert, this statement rings true to me. In fact, a lot of the dreams I remember revolve around very real and familiar environments and have to do with basic human interactions – they certainly feel extremely real while I’m sleeping. But then as I wake up and recollect what happened, I notice the strange tangents that the conversations took, time ellipses, strange details, etc. Maybe if Nolan, without surrendering to surrealism or Lynchian dream-logic, made the characters whose dreams were invaded act in unpredictable, erratic ways?

    Anyway, I don’t want to get too anal about what a dream should feel or look like in a film, there are many satisfying routes a director could take – I just wish Nolan had dealt with the problem instead of throwing it away.

    Rus: “If Nolan was overly surreal a level of enjoyment and engagement with the audience would be lost. Likewise, with such a complex story, visual confusion would make the film even more confusing to the majority of the audience.”

    But general audience expectation and response certainly don’t play on my personal appreciation of a film. I can’t form my opinion based on whether Nolan was able to please a large number of people or not. My reaction is entirely subjective.

    What Pfister (or Nolan) says here: “By maintaining a realistic feel, we believed we could introduce a bizarre or unsettling feel very subtly when we wanted to, without taking the viewer out of the story.” just doesn’t apply to me. I guess I’m just not on the guy’s wavelength.

  • “Its impossible for you to make this claim.”

    Why? Because it’s impossible to remember most of our dreams? True, I can’t argue with that. Maybe there are layers of dreams that play out exactly like reality…

    P.S. How do you write text in bold?

  • Antho24

    Maximine Gerin–It is an impossible statement since people dream differently. Heck, I usually do not dream( I do daydream, for too much).

    “How do you write text in bold?”

    Matt Gamble is an undercover wizard working for the CIA.

  • BOLD TEXT

  • Bold

  • (delete paraphrase)

    type this before text “”

    type this after text “”