Inception Review

Inception
Written and Directed by: Christopher Nolan
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen Page, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Marion Cotillard, Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe, Tom Hardy, Dileep Rao

The holy grail of summer blockbusters is to create a thrilling action movie packed full of special effects set pieces but also backed by a story that is both intelligent and thought-provoking. It’s a delicate balance that is rarely achieved, partially because it is difficult to pull off, and partially because in this day and age, the financial reward is simply not worth the extra effort. You can make just as much (or probably even more) money with dumbed-down, disposable entertainment — which is why we should all thank our lucky stars that there are still filmmakers like Christopher Nolan out there who want to challenge themselves just as much as they want to challenge us.

There aren’t many directors with a track record that allows them to pitch a complicated and completely original concept to a studio and walk away with $200 million to make it. With that kind of price tag, you can be sure that Nolan’s Inception has a lot to live up to, but make no mistake, this movie is worth every penny and then some. There are dazzling visuals and imaginative action sequences, but what makes this film special is the incredibly dense and carefully folded story that envelops the entire production. While Inception may feel like a little too much work for the average viewer, there is still a sense of awe and wonder at every turn, and more than enough excitement to keep hearts racing. For those who also enjoy giving their brain a workout, however, this movie is the ultimate big budget mindbender.

Inception is definitely a movie best enjoyed without very much prior knowledge, and as such, I will offer only the barest of plot summaries. Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a man who makes a questionable living by stealing the innermost secrets of powerful people. He does so by infiltrating their dreams with the help of a team of operatives and a mysterious dream-sharing device. After a failed attempt at extracting information from one business executive (Ken Watanabe), he is offered a job by the very same man. This time, however, must plant information in a competitor’s mind, rather than extract it.

This is arguably Nolan’s first full-blown science-fiction film, but it’s not really as far out as it might seem. He brings his affinity for crime thrillers and mysteries to the mix, ultimately making a heist film with a love story at its core. Aside from the ability to enter dreams, the setting is a near-future world with no discernible difference from our own. Nothing is over-explained, and most of the general concepts are not hard to grasp, it’s just that you have to pay attention. In this way, the movie’s appeal remains fairly broad, and in typical Christopher Nolan fashion the story stays grounded in something familiar.

Watching Inception was, for me, akin to the first time I watched The Matrix, an experience I have been eagerly trying to recapture ever since with very little success. Some of the terminology and concepts instantly harken back to The Matrix, but Inception also quickly separates itself with its subtlety and a different set of rules. Even if you’re not a fan of The Matrix you can at least appreciate the feeling of watching a movie where layers are peeled back to reveal something deeper, and where, unlike most blockbusters, the story never falls apart or sacrifices its own internal logic. Inception is tightly plotted and the rules of the dream world are well-conceived from all angles, holding up under further scrutiny.

Speaking of dreams, Nolan has assembled a dream cast here and they certainly have a hand in elevating the film as well. Leonardo DiCaprio does most of the heavy lifting, and the only unfortunate thing is that there are a lot of similarities between his performance here and his performance earlier this year in Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island. Marion Cotillard has an equally difficult job but is able to match DiCaprio’s intensity while keeping the more emotional moments reined in. Ellen Page finally manages to step out from under the Juno stereotype, playing the young newcomer who is suspicious of Cobb’s motives, while Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Tom Hardy are both somewhat underused dramatically although they do manage to carry out the bulk of the ass-kicking. Then there is Batman alumni Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe and Michael Caine, all of whom are a pleasure to watch. Admittedly, very few supporting characters are truly fleshed out, but the whole movie revolves around Cobb so it only seems appropriate.

The action and special effects are every bit as fantastic and unique as you’ve been led to believe. You hear the word “mind-blowing” thrown around a lot nowadays, but it really does apply here. The fights are never superhuman like in The Matrix, but there are some very interesting scraps in shifting environments and zero gravity. It’s the kind of stuff that makes you wonder, “How the heck did they do that?” There are also some great car chases, shoot outs, and some trippy visuals involving paradoxical environments. If that’s not enough, there is also one sequence reminiscent of a James Bond movie with the team members decked out in matching winter gear and skiis, fighting their way across a snowy landscape. Hans Zimmer’s sinister score pounds itself into your senses to fuel the adrenaline even further.

The one weakness I can see in this film it is that it does feel a bit bloated and unwieldy in the last act. Christopher Nolan doesn’t have many movies that clock in under two hours long, and just like The Dark Knight, there is a general awareness that creeps in at some point that it might be going on a bit longer than necessary. The slow build up to the film’s finale may turn off some viewers, and the levels of recursion may be too much for others, but it lures you back with the prospect of getting even more out of it on repeat viewings.

While it’s true that Inception may not be what everyone is looking for in a summer blockbuster, as far as I’m concerned it is exactly what gets me excited about going to the movies in the first place. Some will say it’s too out there, and others not weird enough, but in that sense it seems to have found the ideal middle ground. It is definitely more of a cerebral experience than an emotional one, but there are very few blockbusters that have ever dared to be this challenging. It is a rare and near-perfect beast, cleverly conceived and executed with precision — one that implants itself in your mind and forces you to contemplate it for weeks afterward. In that way, I suppose this proves that a great film can be the most resilient parasite of all. — Sean

SCORE: 4 stars



Recommended If You Like: The Matrix, Shutter Island, The Dark Knight



  • Selena

    I went to the film not knowing much about it other than a 60 second teaser from tv. I wasn’t sure about the choice my friends had made and MAN was I wrong.
    When the house lights came up I turned to my friends and shouted WHAT A RIDE !!!!!! That’s exactly the best way to describe it , a slow building, heart pounding, intensifying psychological aumusement ride !
    Key points. PAY Attention. Don’t go back and forth to the concession stand. Go to the restroom and get your goodies first, then settle in to stay from beginning to end.
    When it ends, just like a great rollercoaster you will say, LET’S GO AGAIN!!!

  • “It is an impossible statement since people dream differently…

    Well, everybody may dream differently but common expressions like “dreamlike” or “dream-logic” are understood by everyone. There is an overall vision of the dream state that most people agree upon, no?

  • really?! there is a universally known overall vision of a dreamstate, like the hand sign for “check please”. what pray tell is this universally known overall vision of a dreamstate?

  • @Mason: The movie didn’t concern itself with the technology, so there’s not much to say about what was shown in the movie.

  • @ rus in chicago

    Oh boy, this is getting off topic and a little silly, which is partly my fault. If people’s dreams never shared any basic resemblance, how could expressions like dreamlike and dream-logic mean anything to anyone? Time, space, logic, etc. are, generally speaking, operating on another level while dreaming than they are in real life, to varying degrees. Or at least, that’s what my impressions were after years of dreaming and having dreams being told to me.

  • Fatbologna

    I don’t dream all that much but THE most horrifying dream I ever had involved me having sex with the deflated (ie blow-up doll but REAL) corpse of my own father…

    Maybe Nolan should have put something like that in there. That’s a common dream type, right?

  • bramstroker

    Watching this movie i began to wonder if Nolan has ever had a dream. For me, dreaming is about accepting implausible things as reality without questioning it… So the central thesis of the film just doesn’t ring true for me.

  • Just a theory – from listening to the podcast:

    SPOILER ALERT:

    At one point Cobb says “when she would spin the top in her dream it would spin forever”. He spins it at the end and it doesnt stop, meaning the whole thing is actually Mol’s dream. Thats why Mol keeps showing up, shes not part of his subconcious, they are actually in her dream. He is actually the one lost in the dream world and she us trying to use inception to bring him back. Ultimately it doesnt work and he stays. This could be wrong, feel free to shoot holes in it.

  • I thought these two posts might make the film clearer to some of you especially the second one:

    Christopher Nolan’s Inception: Questions, Theories, Secrets, Explanations, Award Buzz
    http://film-book.com/christopher-nolans-inception-questions-theories-secrets-explanations-award-buzz/

    Inception: The 5 Levels Chart
    http://film-book.com/inception-the-5-levels-chart/

  • I found another chart. This one details the last dreams and all of the kicks:

    Inception Infographic: The Last Dreams and Kicks
    http://film-book.com/inception-infographic-the-last-dreams-and-kicks/

  • so-so

    The “mysterious dream-sharing device” is truly one of the most ridiculous props in the recent history of cinema. The mechanics/chemistry of SHARED dreaming via this device are totally unexplained, and honestly I can get past that irritation. But what gets to me the most is how this device is somehow needed within the dream states to go deeper into other dreams.

    I simply could not suspend my disbelief enough to get past the silliness of needing that dream box within the dreams. Couldn’t they just as easily have all hooked themselves up to a spare tire or a chunk of ashpalt? Since none of it was real anyway, why were they even bothering to hook themselves up? Why not just agree on some simple shared cue to initiate the next dream, like a specific spoken word? Because once they’re within the first dream it’s no longer drugs that’s initiating the next dream level. If anything, it’s a form of hypnotism.

  • Jarron

    I am currently writing a science-fiction novel and this movie is so full of original and fresh ideas, it hurt. This movie is very complex and very drawn…it would be well suited for a comic book. There is so much information to retain that you have to be there in the beginning to understand and have a chess-player attention span to keep up with what’s going on because there’s just so much going on.There’s so many plot levels (quite literally), that this movie shuns the Matrix and sprouts ideas (the theme by the way) that is mind-eye candy. The dialogue is a bit loaded and kind of hard to comprehend under the influence of butter and sugar. Nonetheless, the dialogue serves its purpose of informing the viewer on what’s going on as guns blaze a zero-gravity rains supreme. This may be a small spoiler (but not really) but the perjections of people staring at their enemy is so origial and rather creepy because it happens in my dreams! I CAN’T WAIT TO GO TO SLEEP!!

  • - so-so, to me the better question is “Why do people seem to look past the ridiculous dream machine in Inception, but can’t accept the stupid cloth wrap in The Cell?” They are both ridiculous, but in Inception Nolan pulls off his greatest achievement as a writer / director feeding the audience enough atmosphere and drama that they are willing to go along and overlook the illogical.

    You always hear sci-fi fans state that good sci-fi is merely human drama in the context of advanced science. You could say Inception uses the disguise of science to start a ride for the audience and then discards the science. Maybe that is because dreams are as universal as wanting to be love, fear of the beast, hope so the only task is for Nolan to get an acceptable way to unlock the audience’s shared desire to explore another persons dreams. The device is immaterial.

  • It’s about time we had a sensible reevaluation of this film: http://bit.ly/9xBJSz

  • Emil

    Cant belive the reviews this is getting, just finished watching it.. way to long and the character development is quite poor. I dont really care if Kobb makes which makes me indifferent to the outcome. I dunno i think Nolan is getting to much credit for this and The Dark Knight. The Prestige is amazing, this movie just tries to hard.

    Dont mind plot holes watching GI Joe, but in these types of movies it just ruins it, 1.5 stars.

  • jc

    I am dumbfounded by the positive reviews this movie is getting.
    I see it as a pretentious American movie with the gunfire and explosions that characterize so much American cinema.
    The characters left me cold.
    The story made me yawn.
    The future scares me.

  • Y

    Visually amazing though after 30 minutes special effects aren’t enough to keep one interested in this film. Way too long and I agree that the characters lack depth big time. It felt like far to much was being stuffed into it.

  • Jenny P

    I personally think this was one of the best movies to come out in ages. To be honest I did not want to watch it. I have never been a huge DiCaprio fan. Well let me tell you what. Now I am. This was the first movie to keep me glues to the screen and wanting more in forever. I have to think my boyfriend for making me watch it against my will. It was actually a some what challenging movie. I mean its the first movie that kept me on the edge of my seat. Then OMG when it went off. I couldn’t stop thinking about it. COULD’NT. I pulled out Google and researched and read and went crazy til I made sure I had all the info I could get. Watched Edited scenes. Then….I went back and watched it again. That’s right, I watched it again. And I loved it all over. I have to say this movie restored my faith in movies……Well then after that I watched tons of crap movies that killed it all over. But point is it restored my faith even if the next movie killed it all over again.

  • nina

    I stumbled upon this review while searching for something else and couldn’t help but read it. I haven’t read any reviews of inception and was eager to hear if there are some official opinions stating how overrated this movie is. I get how it deserves oscar nominations in the technical area – visual effects and sound but a nomination for best picture of the year? Are you fucking kidding me? To level out this movie with black swan, for example? To quote sheldon – you are good naturedly ribbing me, aren’t you?
    What bothers me the most about this review – it is stacked with words emphasizing precision like ‘internal logic’ and ‘tightly plotted’, ‘well conceived’ and ‘executed with precision’. Seriously?! What exactly is precise about this movie? The fact that that the architect draws some picture and builds some lego mazes and it somehow all relates to their dream? I’m not even gonna go into further details. I think comment no. 67 sums it up real nicely. And one more thing – this movie comes nowhere near matrix. Even though science fiction and even though made 10 years ago, this movie was explained almost to the very core – unlike this dipshit overselled movie.