<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former Model Sues Over Photo Used as &#8220;Masturbation Aid&#8221; in Couples Retreat</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adultvideocorner.com</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-818359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adultvideocorner.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-818359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always find this type of information very interesting! Thank you for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find this type of information very interesting! Thank you for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-733155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-733155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of Lohan sueing the commerical recently for causing her harm. It seems like a joke. From experiences, I know that an agreement like the one she would have had to sign are fairly air tight for this very reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of Lohan sueing the commerical recently for causing her harm. It seems like a joke. From experiences, I know that an agreement like the one she would have had to sign are fairly air tight for this very reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-732447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-732447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;d be surprised... Couples Retreat made $169 million worldwide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d be surprised&#8230; Couples Retreat made $169 million worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-732381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-732381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My question....did the film even make as much as she&#039;s asking for? lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question&#8230;.did the film even make as much as she&#8217;s asking for? lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-732271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-732271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a model suing because someone masterbates to her picture is like a postman suing you for sending a letter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a model suing because someone masterbates to her picture is like a postman suing you for sending a letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-732262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-732262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Sticky&quot;, ha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sticky&#8221;, ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/15/former-model-sues-over-photo-used-as-masturbation-aid-in-couples-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-732205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=35012#comment-732205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see this carrying much weight. As stated, she signed a general release for the right&#039;s holder to use the photo (I assume) as they see fit. The right&#039;s holder (not her) gave the movie permission to use the photo most likely. Maybe she doesn&#039;t agree with the context of the usage, but then it&#039;s just not up to her the second she signed that release. Maybe next time she won&#039;t sign that release which allows that usage.

I would be pretty shocked if the courts even give this quasi-pornographic argument any time at all. Considering this was a comedy in wide release, any pornography was likely implied, rather than shown directly. 

One other thing the courts will no doubt think about, a decision in her favor would open the floodgates for many similar lawsuits. 

In my opinion, this will likely be dismissed (or settled) before it even reaches court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see this carrying much weight. As stated, she signed a general release for the right&#8217;s holder to use the photo (I assume) as they see fit. The right&#8217;s holder (not her) gave the movie permission to use the photo most likely. Maybe she doesn&#8217;t agree with the context of the usage, but then it&#8217;s just not up to her the second she signed that release. Maybe next time she won&#8217;t sign that release which allows that usage.</p>
<p>I would be pretty shocked if the courts even give this quasi-pornographic argument any time at all. Considering this was a comedy in wide release, any pornography was likely implied, rather than shown directly. </p>
<p>One other thing the courts will no doubt think about, a decision in her favor would open the floodgates for many similar lawsuits. </p>
<p>In my opinion, this will likely be dismissed (or settled) before it even reaches court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>