Former Model Sues Over Photo Used as “Masturbation Aid” in Couples Retreat

couplesretreatlawsuit

Jon Favreau and the producers of the movie Couples Retreat have landed themselves in a rather sticky situation this week after a former model filed a lawsuit against them for an unauthorized cameo appearance. Apparently in the film Favreau’s character uses a photo of Irina Krupnik for inspiration to… er… “play Uno” while his wife is in the bathroom. Krupnik says that the scene has caused her “great humiliation, embarrassment, emotional distress, shame, mortification and injury to her reputation and career”, and she is seeking $10 million in damages. And to think, some women might actually take it as a compliment. She also notes that it “would be a crime if Mr. Favreau attempted it on a New York City subway”, although what relevance that serves remains to be seen.

The photo in question appears on a fake brochure for the fictional resort featured in the movie, but it’s unclear how or why the 10-year-old image of Krupnik was chosen. She says that she did sign a general release back when the picture was taken, but that she did not approve of it being used in a “quasi-pornographic context.” Her lawyer insists that NBC Universal could have chosen a willing participant instead, which I suppose is a good point, but I haven’t seen the movie, so I’m not sure how prominent the photo is. Either way, if she does end up getting even a part of the settlement she’s looking for, it will definitely bring new meaning to the term “money shot”.



  • Rob

    I can’t see this carrying much weight. As stated, she signed a general release for the right’s holder to use the photo (I assume) as they see fit. The right’s holder (not her) gave the movie permission to use the photo most likely. Maybe she doesn’t agree with the context of the usage, but then it’s just not up to her the second she signed that release. Maybe next time she won’t sign that release which allows that usage.

    I would be pretty shocked if the courts even give this quasi-pornographic argument any time at all. Considering this was a comedy in wide release, any pornography was likely implied, rather than shown directly.

    One other thing the courts will no doubt think about, a decision in her favor would open the floodgates for many similar lawsuits.

    In my opinion, this will likely be dismissed (or settled) before it even reaches court.

  • Matt

    “Sticky”, ha.

  • Mike

    a model suing because someone masterbates to her picture is like a postman suing you for sending a letter.

  • My question….did the film even make as much as she’s asking for? lol.

  • You’d be surprised… Couples Retreat made $169 million worldwide.

  • This reminds me of Lohan sueing the commerical recently for causing her harm. It seems like a joke. From experiences, I know that an agreement like the one she would have had to sign are fairly air tight for this very reason.

  • I always find this type of information very interesting! Thank you for that.