Comments on: Showgirls 2 Trailer… Seriously. https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/ The World's Longest-Running Movie Podcast Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33 By: patrik https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-729696 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:36:11 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-729696 Is this how deep humanity has sunk?

]]> By: juan https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-728149 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:51:06 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-728149 wow you know a movie is really bad when it has naked woman in it and i still dont want to see it, and whats up with the music dam this movie blows

]]> By: Kronos https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-727075 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:01:59 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-727075 This…I pray…has to be a joke. No studio in the world would spend money on this crap.

]]> By: Reed Farrington https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726998 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:26:19 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726998 I actually bought the fancy box set for Showgirls for something like $6.99 brand spanking new. I must admit that the box advertised some interesting included swag like the shot glasses. But I was mightily disappointed with the cheap sleep mask and breast tassels.

BTW, I skipped watching the Showgirls 2 trailer. I’m not going to fall for a sleazy ruse.

]]> By: HFD https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726938 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:41:04 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726938 Watching this made me vomit a little bit in my mouth.

]]> By: rus in chicago https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726931 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:24:46 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726931 hey this is a family website, there are children like Reed present!

]]> By: Steve https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726893 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:19:40 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726893 There’s no way this can possibly be real. The fact that not a single person of the original is related to this at all, the incredibly amateurish trailer (for what’s supposed to be a motion picture), the shameless nudity (is this even allowed in youtube or will it be pulled down), also further look into the youtube video shows it’s a video from a complete unknown individual, NOT a legitimate channel for studios or film trailers.

]]> By: Drewsifer https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726419 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:11:35 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726419 This is fake I call shenanigans

]]> By: Drewsifer https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726417 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:01:37 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726417 Finally a movie for real film fans, I say that cause you’d have to really love films in order to watch this so you can have a valid opinion on it. Bit seriously who doesn’t like titties

]]> By: rick https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726316 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:24:24 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726316 They’re playing it fast and loose with the term “motion picture.””

no pun intended

]]> By: Rusty https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726306 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:55:20 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726306 This looks like the most awful thing ever. And I watched ANTI-CHRIST last night.

]]> By: Brendan https://filmjunk.com/2010/03/08/showgirls-2-trailer-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-726303 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:39:38 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=34650#comment-726303 They’re playing it fast and loose with the term “motion picture.” That looks like it was shot on a Handycam and edited on an Amiga.

]]>