Alice in Wonderland Review

Alice in Wonderland
Directed by: Tim Burton
Written by: Linda Woolverton (screenplay), Lewis Carroll (books)
Starring: Mia Wasikowska, Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Crispin Glover, Alan Rickman, Stephen Fry

aliceinwonderland1

Less than three months after the release and total box office domination of James Cameron’s Avatar, many questions still remain about the promise and the appeal of digital 3-D movies. Was Avatar merely a fluke, or did it lay the groundwork for this technology to be fully utilized by filmmakers and fully embraced by moviegoers? Is 3-D truly the future of storytelling on the big screen, or is it still just a distraction? As the next major 3-D film from a visionary director, many people are looking to Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland for answers to some of these questions.

Once again Disney and Tim Burton have chosen to hang the film on their most valuable leading man, Johnny Depp, expanding the role of the Mad Hatter in the story in order to accommodate him. Depp and Burton have worked together so often over the years that the collaborations are all starting to blur together, to the point where it has now become (ahem) old hat. Still, with all the potential for eye candy here, Burton does manage to offer some genuine moments of wonder in Wonderland, and if that’s all you’re looking for, this is one trip that you might want to take.

The movie is essentially a mash-up of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass (which isn’t a huge issue since the two novels are quite often mixed up in most people’s minds anyway). Alice is 19, and about to be betrothed to a man for whom she does not have any feelings. As he asks for her hand in marriage, she takes a moment to step away and think, only to find herself chasing a familiar white rabbit down a rabbit hole. She re-enters Wonderland, a place that she had previously visited when she was much younger, but apparently forgotten about. Upon her arrival she learns that it has been foretold that a girl named Alice will slay the Jabberwocky, a dragon that is controlled by the evil Red Queen, and free the land from her tyranny. However, there’s just one problem: there appears to be some confusion over whether or not she is actually the right Alice for the job.

With all the focus on the 3-D aspect of this film, it’s important to note that Alice in Wonderland was not actually shot in 3-D the same way that Avatar was. All of the 3-D was added in post-production. There was also no motion capture used; although they did experiment with it initially, they ended up simply using the live action footage and inserting CG characters afterward. The end result is that the world does not feel quite as fully realized and as immersive as Avatar. Granted, it is a more stylized world, and the production time on Avatar was a lot longer as well, but Wonderland is somehow not quite as enthralling as Pandora (interestingly, Robert Stromberg was apparently production designer on both films). At times the environments feel a bit washed out and empty, which could be a result of the 3-D not meshing well with some of the darker colours. Either way, the character designs are still visually striking, and the CG animation work is one of the movie’s greatest strengths.

aliceinwonderland2

The movie starts off at an engaging and brisk pace, introducing a number of creepy and intriguing characters all of whom are voiced by inspired British actors including the White Rabbit (Michael Sheen), Tweedledee and Tweedledum (Matt Lucas), Cheshire Cat (Stephen Fry), and the Blue Caterpillar (Alan Rickman). By the time Alice reaches the Mad Tea Party, things are really starting to come unhinged and the zaniness is at an amusingly high level. Unfortunately, as the story transitions to the second half of the film, it falls in line with much more bland and formulaic fantasy fare in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. We are quickly whisked from plot point to plot point without much excitement or danger, and many of the wacky surprises and character interactions slowly fade away until we conclude with a tired clash of CG armies.

Make no mistake, even though Alice is a bit older in this version, this is a movie that is aimed squarely at kids, and doesn’t have the depth that some might demand from an adaptation of this classic tale. Screenwriter Linda Woolverton does not do much to elevate the material, although there is just enough self-discovery that goes on in the film to justify Alice’s character arc. The tone attempts to remain cute while also being purposely weird and trippy, which doesn’t always work. The sensibilities of Disney and Tim Burton at times appear to be struggling against each other, although the resulting middle ground still makes for some fun visual gags.

Johnny Depp succeeds in carrying much of the film as the Mad Hatter, even though his character feels a bit inconsistent. He alternates from a drunk lisp to a Scottish brogue and back again. Contrived at times, yes, and at other times it feels like we’ve seen it before, but it’s still a performance that not many other actors could pull off. (He does “nuke the fridge” towards the end with his breakdancing scene, but I won’t get into that.)

Helena Bonham Carter is humourous but perhaps not quite menacing enough as the Red Queen, while Crispin Glover is a great Knave of Hearts, if only he had been given a little more to do. Anne Hathaway’s White Queen seems to be a mere footnote in the film, but most importantly, Mia Wasikowska is sincere enough to buy into as the main character of Alice herself.

Alice in Wonderland can definitely be categorized as Tim Burton lite, and is nowhere near as strong as his earlier works from the late ’80s and early ’90s… but then, you probably already knew that. I would say that it’s most comparable to his take on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory in terms of its energy and whimsical nature. This not the dark and edgy Lewis Carroll adaptation that some people may be hoping for, but it does have moments of twisted brilliance. I would still recommend it primarily on the strength of the visuals and some of the performances. As far as the 3-D experience goes, however, I honestly can’t say that it was really a necessary part of the equation. — Sean

SCORE: 2.5 stars



Recommended If You Like: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, The Chronicles of Narnia, The Golden Compass



  • I have been hearing similar reports about the film Sean. Adding 3D to the film after the fact instead of filming the movie in 3D from the beginning was a bad idea.

    Story wise, since it is original, I am looking forward to that aspect of the film.

    Nice catch on Through the Looking-Glass. I’ll have to put that on my to-read list.

  • Jonny Ashley

    nuking the fridge! hahaha

  • rick

    that stinks. All the previews make it look like a dark take, but hearing it’s for mostly children is very dis-concerting. But i will see it anyway. I know alot of people are getting sick of the burton/depp match up, but i love it.

  • I’m a little disappointed that the fridge got nuked with this one. The only other hope for a dark and edgy adaptation was the one of American McGee’s Alice, but that’s been put on a backburner. As well, it didn’t seem too promising with Marcus Nispel (Texas Chainsaw Massacre) at the helm.

  • Jenny

    I just saw Alice in Wonderland last night! It was…. well, I don’t want to spoil it for anyone =D You should have seen the lines! But it was so worth it. And everyone, and I mean EVERYONE was decked out in Alice gear, from Mad Hatter hats to Alice dresses to really cool Alice in Wonderland t-shirts. I went to my local radio station site and you can actually win some really cool Alice goodies like t-shirts I saw last night, nail polish, and awesome posters. Check it out!

    http://tinyurl.com/aliceprizepack

  • You guys might like this riff on Tim Burton

    http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1929453

  • Saw it today. I thought it picked up the baton really well, and stayed true to the tone of Carroll’s children’s stories, albeit with that inimitable Burton twist. Depp and Burton back on form, I reckon

    http://wereviewanything.co.uk/2010/03/05/tim-burtons-alice-in-wonderland-opening-day-review/

  • I haven’t see it yet, but I really want to. It looks amazing, but it seems to be getting a lot of bad reviews. Maybe they are trying to compare it to Avatar, not really sure. I will still go check it out.

  • Bob The Slob
  • Liah ali

    Mmmmm.. The movie sucks.. dont watch it.. more like watching narnia than a time burton movie :(

  • Justice

    It was awful…like really bad. It tried way too hard and ended up being boring, a cardinal sin…particularly for a movie aimed at children. The times it went for the “look how crazy and zany this is” laughs it received maybe a few chuckles from the audience or just silence. Depp’s dance seen was painful. I wasn’t expecting a lot but man, I didn’t expect it to be that bad. The 3D was pretty blah as well…but did anyone notice how crispin glover’s movement seemed off? Was that by design or just shit cgi?

    I mentioned before that it seems like burton is just mailing it in, its now confirmed.

  • KeithTalent

    I thought it was great! Had a smile on my face pretty much the entire time.

    3D is a waste of time anyway, so I just saw it in 2D.

  • I was under the impression they shot the film with 3D cameras. Hearing it was done in post certainly explains why it was so shitty.

  • Yamakaze

    The acteress who did Alice was dreadful! Stephen Fry was epic.

  • yee boy!

    that movie was toooo fcking lame!

  • patrik

    i thought Depps dance was the highlight of the movie, I loved that.. I´ll agree with Seans 2,5 rating though, it was simply ok. I liked the performances, even though I would have preferred Summer Glau as Alice but I thought Mia did well

  • Interesting how the middling Rotten Tomatoes score for this movie reflects the opposite reactions people are having towards elements of this film.

    I’m not a fan of fantasy, so I personally thought the film was beautiful, but mind-numbingly dull. I hope that there will be someone on the podcast who really liked the film so that I can joust with him.

  • visually beautiful and creative, the absolutely terrible script and completely fabricated backstory tries extremely hard to distract you from the awesome graphics, and eventually the horrendous script wins when the entire film is just tossed into the garbage in the last 20 minutes or so ending somehow with corporate globalization and imperialism in china. wtf this film shouldn’t be called alice in wonderland. it should be called joan of arc takes acid.

  • rikos

    i think this is one of the best reviews I’ve read. Visuals are good but I still expected them to better when I heard Tim Burton is doing Alice. Plot is horrible, timing is weird and was really disappointed that it was a kids a movie and not a dark twist.

  • Jimmy

    I was realy excited bout this one! But deffinetly dissapointed. It might hav been better if was on shrooms! How many accents did depp have! He even did his jack sparrow voice at one point! WTF! And WTF with the break dancing and spinning head at the end! Creepy and akward! I thought the movie was gna end with a singing number! Lol.That wouldv been awful. It was just huge mesh of a story! And mess! But looked kinda cool. :)

  • Lindsay

    I’m really getting tired of people comparing this movie to Avatar, and I’m also tired of people being disappointed in the movie because it ‘isn’t as dark’ as Tim Burton’s other movies. There are lots of directors out there who direct a variety of different genres, so who’s to say Tim Burton can’t make a movie that’s not I’m-on-an-acid-trip wierd? Personally, I liked the movie, because it was well-casted, visually well-done, and I liked the story. Through all of these reviews, that’s what seems to be missing here…a review of the actual STORY and not a review about people’s pre-expectations getting let down. Seriously, lighten up. As a Tim Burton movie, it’s not what you’d expect, that is indeed true. But don’t bash Alice in Wonderland because it’s not typical Tim Burton.

  • Good job i think.

  • mop

    it sucks

  • this is my idea i gave it to tim. i’m sorry if you don’t beleav me…

  • Alejandro

    Luckily i did believe 6 impossible things before my breakfast this morning and i hope I’ll do he same until i die… Script, acting…whatever. I still cant wipe the smile from my face while i type this. I’m 32 and honestly was starting to become more like those ‘studied critics out there’ this movie made me realize sooo many things about my personal life. I want to be a kid forever, i don’t want to be like you , or you , or you.. and hopefully i wont be. Thanks tim burton!!! xD

  • Save your money and see it in 2D, the 3D will just give you a headache. The 2D version is brighter more colourful and looks right. The 3D doesn’t even look 3D at all. After Avatar all these people jumping on the band wagon with post production 3D touchups are just tyring to cash in. You have to film it in 3D for it to work… Great review I liked it

  • Ordinary acting performace, ordinary Fx and cinematography. But it is a Burton’s film.

  • Caitlin

    just saw it in 3D today. I didn’t have too many expectations going in. but wow. I was dissapointed anyway. It’s…..interesting. whoever decided to do close up shots on them after the makeup was done, was insane. you could see johnny Depp’s contact lenses (ruins the effect horribly). His eye makeup was fantastic, but the white makeup should have been touched up. and regularly. The white queens lipstick also irritated (sorry, I pay attention to these little things). the script was not horrible, but also not good. The mad hatter is supposed to be insane beyond all reason, but the cup throwing rabbit was more mad than he was. he was more sane than mad. As much as i love Johnny Depp as an actor, he fell short. All he seemed to do was combine Willy Wonka and Jack Sparrow. it’s certainly worth seeing; it has some very good parts. Just don’t see it in IMAX 3D. ruins the effects horribly. It just seems like they focused so much on the CGI that they ignored most other aspects of the movie.

  • Hayley

    I think Alice in wonderland looked awsome in 3D

  • just got back from seeing this in 2D…really bad. Tim Burton’s films are really interesting in the fact I can sense if I’m going to like the film in the very first scene. I guess because he is so arty I can feel in the first scene if his heart, or vision, was “on”. here, like charlie and planet of monkeys, he just did have it. the woman that wrote the script should give her fee back! I was shocked to read a woman developed this story, nothing interesting about Alice’s quest both personally or fantasy-wise. this film had no purpose from the get go. Why show your hand by laying out the story in the scroll?! This was a complete waste of so many really great characters. the most developed relationship between a fantastical character and Alice is with a big dog that wasn’t even in the original material?! The connection between Alice and the Madhatter is totally unearned. There is soooooooooo many cool things they could have done with the eat me, drink me stuff that wasn’t developed. Why didn’t Alice steal away some of the potions and use it like Frodo used the ring? why didn’t they make Alice a woman and when she drinks the potion she becomes a girl?! to much like Hook, whatever, the film they made fails.

    I can’t remember a film that had such changes in imagine quality between scenes. I literally could feel the scenes Burton invested time on (introduction of the cat in the woods, Queen of Hearts intro with the frogs) and the ones he didn’t care about (Alice with the White Queen, et. all) the image quality swung wildly from bright and amazing to amateurish and dull!

    Elfman needs to be put in the old composers home, now!

  • Hello

    Well I watched it and it was ok. The pace was slow at times but the image quality was great. I don’t think the 3-d was something that anyone was looking for. It just gave the movie more depth at times. It made the dark scenes look better on my opinion. I just thought that the pace could have been more fast and exciting. Got confusing at times. Too many mini plots and not enough things to speed it up.

  • krystalin

    hey does any one know the name of that big dog thing that the mouse stole the eye of??????? ploease help me

  • Colonel Panic

    I liked it. I saw it in 2D. I thought it moved along very crisply. The effects were fantastic. No it wasn’t william boroughs killing his wife but not all movies should be.
    I’ve gotta stop reading reviews before seeing movies. I expected junk but it wasnt so then i didnt know what to think. I mean really, are the people that didnt like this movie the same people who liked the same giant robots and blue people dying over and over in the last 20 minutes of Avatar? At least this movie wasnt message first/plot second like Avatar.
    I recommend it, take your kids or not. The money is on the screen.

  • Mr. Rich

    WOW, saw it tonight. Holy Crap,I want my money back. Better yet, I think i should have been paid to watch the movie. Thats 2 hours of my life i will never get back. The CGI was just OK. Have seen much better. Just watch Avatar, you will see also. Decent Actors and actresses in horrible roles. With a storyline that seemed more like a homework assignment from 8th grade English class. I Saw people pack up their families and walk out less than halfway through the movie. I would have, but i did pay for it, so I stayed and suffered through it. Again, I will never get that time back.

  • Honeyviews

    I saw it today – for the 2nd time. I loved loved loved it! The visuals were gorgeous, the acting was wonderful – the story (although tweaked for the film) was comfortably familiar and had a valuable message as well. Jabberwocky has always been one of my favorite pieces and it was great fun seeing it brought to the screen. I don’t really care about the production trivia – just the end result.

  • miss jenkins

    I saw this about a week ago, after seeing a trailer I fought wow but was very disapointed when I watched it, it seemed to me like the film was rushed and jummbled up and preety boring and I think the only reason it made so much at box office is because the trailer made the film I havnt and would not recommend this film ever and would neva buy it on dvd!!!

  • Lexi

    I have a few comments about this film, and would like to say firstly – that i saw it in 2D, and stop comparing it to Avatar. Avatar took 10 years to make, compared to this.

    1. One of my favourite things about stories such as Alice In Wonderland is its applicabilty. I view it as kind of a base for stories to sprout and branch out further. That is why I like the changing of characters to some degree.
    2. It is noticeable that Depp knew and understood his character well, especially his motivations. Rather than other actors who I have seen in the role.
    3. Mia is a wonderful actress and a good role model for kids. I have heard some people complain about this ‘females can do it’ mantra throughout the film, which i enjoyed, compared to the hollywood bimbo characters i have seen.
    4. I thought it was a clever idea, and i think it is one of the movies where some people understand it too well and find it simple, and others that will not understand it at all. Personally, i found it easy to understand and thought it was a refreshing take on the story.

  • sarah

    I agree that it seems certain scenes, as a fan, you could tell Tim really put a lot of work into. Others, not so much. I thought it was a bit long. I was completely taken aback by avril lavignes voice at the end of the film. The transition from Elfmans mind blowing compositions to a young fresh voice seemed so wrong. I cant complain, because regardless I still have the most respect for Tim Burton. I just thought some of it was a bit off. I think I’m much too attached to the style of his other movies, so this one dissapointed me a little. I really enjoyed the dead heads.

  • sarah

    i also have no problem with depp and burton continueing their work together. it always makes me happy.

  • applepie

    I really feel wield why there is people like Johnny Depp’s performance. Seemed to be so contrived.
    I don’t like the movie, neither Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

  • Ryan

    Lol Love The Movie :D
    We have to do a review for our english homework in school about a movie we like, and im choosing this.

    So you’ve done most of the work for me!
    Thanks xD

  • Nick

    The film is incredible. I recomend it and cant understand all this people who dont like it. Probably they havent fantasy or probably films like Terminator 3 and Rambo are the best movies according there taste.
    Alice in Wonderland is a great interpretation of the original story with awsome visual efects and this is probably the best film in last mounths.
    Never trust to reviews. But there is something worst – to have a best taste. Who cant see the briliancy of the movie defenatelly have some problems with his head.

    Sorry for my bad English.

  • Hej

    I think this film had both pros and cons. The characters and the design were fantastic, I mean, just look at the mad hatter!

    However, the story was really dull, “We got to get the epic sword and kill the dragon!” :( Come on, it can’t be that hard to come up with a story more interesting than that!

  • Erica Ashley

    The movie was a waste of my time the only good thing about It was the 3D it didn’t pertain to “ANYTHING” in the original movie that disney made I was very dissapointed I think they wasted time and money on this film if they weren’t going to do it the right way they shouldn’t have made it at all ????wheres the catpillar weres the crazy weird animals wheres the march hair and everyother character missing that helped keep the story alive and intertaining????

  • I would like to say thank you for sharing this cool article. Bookmarked and sharing for friends.

  • you are mad