<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Docs 2009: Objectified Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2009/05/14/hot-docs-2009-objectified-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2009/05/14/hot-docs-2009-objectified-review/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 06:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2009/05/14/hot-docs-2009-objectified-review/comment-page-1/#comment-684812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20756#comment-684812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...A lot of people have mentioned the fact that Objectified lacks the central debate that Helvetica had (ie. good design vs bad design). While I didnâ€™t find that to be very problematic, I did feel that there was a bit of a missed opportunity with regards to the tension that did exist in the film: good design vs wasteful products.&quot;

Maybe that&#039;s idea for the next part of the trilogy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;A lot of people have mentioned the fact that Objectified lacks the central debate that Helvetica had (ie. good design vs bad design). While I didnâ€™t find that to be very problematic, I did feel that there was a bit of a missed opportunity with regards to the tension that did exist in the film: good design vs wasteful products.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s idea for the next part of the trilogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2009/05/14/hot-docs-2009-objectified-review/comment-page-1/#comment-582213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reed Farrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20756#comment-582213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why I oughta... :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why I oughta&#8230; <img src="https://filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rocks</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2009/05/14/hot-docs-2009-objectified-review/comment-page-1/#comment-582188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Rocks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20756#comment-582188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reed looks old in that picture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed looks old in that picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>