The Day The Earth Stood Still Review

The Day the Earth Stood Still
Directed by: Scott Derrickson
Written by: David Scarpa, Edmund H. North (original)
Starring: Keanu Reeves, Jennifer Connelly, Kathy Bates, Jon Hamm, Jaden Smith, John Cleese

Gort, we hardly knew ye.

To set the mood for The Day the Earth Stood Still, I listened a lot to Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon. It didn’t include my favorite Floyd track, “Comfortably Numb”. That sentiment was uncomfortably close to the male lead’s notorious acting style. I wasn’t about to take any chances on tainting my enjoyment of this much-anticipated film.

For those of you who are fans of Robert Wise’s 1951 version with Michael Rennie, you will find much to appreciate here as similar philosophical issues are raised and addressed. What is less successful are the awkward mechanics brought to bear to keep the plot moving. An intriguing premise is mutated by conventional cinematic ploys and the potential for wonderment is lost.

The film opens in 1928 with a mountaineer discovering a pulsing sphere. He breaks its surface and is left with a vaccination mark for his troubles. (As we will see, it was actually a DNA extraction scar). Jumping to the present day, the movie quickly establishes its characters. Helen Benson is a professor of astrobiology and stepmother to 8-year old Jacob. She is abruptly whisked off in black SUV fashion to a government facility where the imminent crisis has been astrocharted. An object is on a collision course with Earth at a speed that renders avoidance impossible. Massive destruction is imminent.

Fortunately for we humans, the object is piloted (a larger sphere) and it lands in Central Park. The alien visitor’s gesture of greeting is misinterpreted and he is shot. (Note to Department of Defense: We’re going to need some protocols here because this happens a lot in these movies.) There is a much-improved take on the alien autopsy idea and soon the visitor – Keanu Reeves as Klaatu – is healthy enough for face time with the Secretary of Defense, Regina Jackson (Kathy Bates channeling Donald Rumsfeld). After a thoroughly enjoyable cross-purposes conversation, the film slips into the highly arbitrary mechanics of keeping the plot in gear. Soon enough, Klaatu, Helen, and Jacob are on the run from the military. Gort – Klaatu’s 30 ft tall robot – provides some diversions from the main chase. Ultimately Klaatu has to make a call about humanity’s survival. The question is, “Are we worth saving?”

The first one third of this movie is top shelf sci-fi. The enigmatic opening sequence hints at a quantum application of the entangled photons phenomenon. The pace builds as we experience the normality of Helen’s college life short-circuited by the frightening intrusion of the crisis; the Central Park landing with that instant of wrong-headed violence; and the “birthing” of Klaatu (good hard core sci-fi) all leading to the conversation mentioned above. Fast, scary, and threatening, the action nicely sets up Klaatu’s best line. In response to Jackson’s belligerent questioning about his motives, his reply is a simple question, “Your planet?” As movies go, it ranks up there with “I’ll be back” or “I see dead people”. It seems that although the universe is large, planets with conditions that support life are rare. We humans are squatting on one of these rarities and the rest of the universe has judged our tenancy unacceptable.

The balance of the film tries to resolve this intriguing dilemma by hanging the action on a long chase. Unfortunately the debate is fragmented with arbitrary plot ideas (some good, mostly bad – magic salves anyone?) that keep the action moving but diminish the movie’s specialness. Another example? As if the welcome wagon shooting wasn’t enough, the next step is to drug Klaatu into revealing his intentions. From there it’s a short walk to the lie detector. Where do these defense secretaries come from anyway? In this case, flawed screenplays.

This disconcerting jumble continues as Klaatu, Helen, and Jacob are chased by what appears to be the Ministry of Silly Walks. In a smart attempt to get back on message, Klaatu meets with another alien, planted years ago. He agrees Klaatu should start the clean up of the planet and spheres are dispensed as arks. No seats for humans. Importantly, the planted alien wants to stay to die with the humans. He tries to explain why but can’t find the words. It’s an ominous failure for us because this movie is entertaining us (or not) with the pros and cons of just that notion. It’s what scriptwriters are for. From then on, it’s up to Helen and Jacob to show Klaatu that humans are worth the bother. And did I mention Gort? He’s a sideshow for the military to demonstrate the futility of their approach.

The Day the Earth Stood Still has two types of actors – aliens and humans. As you might guess, Reeves nails the alien; the other actors generally fail as humans. Like his predecessor Rennie, Reeves brings his own aura. His unusually glossy, intriguing face mimics Rennie’s ascetic countenance. The filmmaker even tries to suggest Rennie’s unusual gait by slo-moing Reeves in several sequences during their run from authorities. Most importantly, Reeves never shifts out of neutral and that’s a good thing. The morning haze look and deliberate articulation nicely suggest an alien getting to grips with the conflicted civilizations inhabiting this planet.

His co-star Jennifer Connelly fares less well. Unlike the original Helen Benson, she is given very little to do – the distant look in her eyes may fit her role as astrobiologist but it doesn’t engage the audience with her concerns. Still she summons up the necessary love and compassion when Klaatu is close to making his final call. Her stepson Jacob played by Jaden Smith delivers young but nothing more. Kathy Bates’ pugnacious Secretary of Defense is conventional but her character rarely rises above plot device.

As for Gort, the last we see of him is inside the military’s lab. An integral part of the plot in the 1951 film, here he’s shunted aside after displaying a few pyrotechnics. In an apparent washing of hands by the filmmaker, the movie leaves him hanging with no hint of his fate. Not a smart thing to do with a 30 ft tall omnipotent robot that doesn’t speak our language.

If you like sci-fi, The Day the Earth Stood Still is a must see. For those who don’t care about the genre, you could find worse ways to kill 90 minutes. Like all good sci-fi, the film takes on an imponderable – what’s our worth as a species – and tries to make the issue real enough that we must think about it. But as a significant sci-fi work, it has too many cinematic flaws. The great ones – Tardovsky’s Solaris, Spielberg’s E.T., and the overlooked Starman – all create a way to balance three things: reality as we know it, plausible scientific mystery, and compelling storytelling. When it’s done well, it’s as close as we’ll personally get to visiting the rest of the universe. The Day the Earth Stood Still loses its balance when poor storytelling mechanics fatally undermine the reality and mystery. — Curt

SCORE: 3 stars



Recommended If You Like: Starman, Contact, Close Encounters of the Third Kind



  • Watched it online for free. Stomached as much as I could. It is one small click about direct to DVD.

    Loved the whole “we aren’t working and loving each other so were destroying the earth” bit and of course, the mother and her love for the kid that brings warmth to the aliens heart and he saves humanity.

    Absolutely utter silliness!

    Sean, and you wonder why I cannot get excited on new films….:D

  • I haven’t seen this movie yet(although I really want to and was dissapointed it wasn’t reviewed to the full extent on the podcast this week)but I think this movie will probably fall into the same catagory as the new terminator movie will. It would be a great Sci-Fi movie ifit just didn’t have such a recognizable name attached to it.

  • Alex

    You slammed it in the Podcast to appease Jay and Greg then give it 3 stars in the review. C’mon Sean.

  • Hey Alex, I didn’t write this review, Curt did.

  • Get your shit together Alex, Jesus. *epiclol* :)

  • Mike

    This movie is as bad as The Happening. Dumb, preachy, silly. And I am being generous.

  • I don’t know why people have a problem with this movie being “preachy”. God forbid a sci-fi movie actually forces people to reflect on themselves or the world around them. This is what sci-fi movies used to do, before they were just mindless excuses for special effects.

    If anything it’s less preachy than the original, and kind of lets humans off the hook, which was lame in my opinion.

  • “This is what sci-fi movies used to do, before they were just mindless excuses for special effects.”

    Yeah, I think there is alot more to be said for sci-fi movies pre-1977, than post-1977. Many of them started out with a concept or a theme (often a topical ‘issue’ I suppose), and it was easier to deal with controversy in some sort of fantastic setting, the future seemed obvious. After Star Wars, sci-fi became about the spaceships, and pretty much still is. If anything people are more willing than ever to forget everything about everything and just look at pretty colors for hours on end.

    I wouldn’t mind a bit more preaching in sci-fi movies. I guess Star Trek would be the best bet of something worthwhile in major release, but with it being written by the guys behind Transformers, I doubt it will have much to offer in terms of interesting content.

  • cool ,should every one watch this movie

  • With all the advertising and the destruction of Earth theme, I would have expected this movie to have a larger opening weekend. All the negative reviews and word of mouth would then make for a quick drop-off in revenue. I would be surprised if this movie makes more than 31 million in any subsequent week.

    Perhaps the execs were smart not to release Star Trek at this time. But the poor showing of this movie does not bode well for the upcoming Star Trek movie. It will be a miracle if Star Trek doesn’t tank.

    From the text of the review, I would have expected Curt to give this movie 2 stars.

    BTW, I’d forgive Alex his mistake because Sean and Curt have similar reviewing styles.

  • I thought it was Jay and Curt?

  • Alex

    Sorry about the mix up Sean. I was just trying to break your balls. I’ll put more effort into it.

    On a side note I’d like to honestly thank you for putting so much effort into the website.

  • Goon

    TDTESS was sheeeee-it. But aside from the silliness, the most annoying part was the Go! Team poster on the 9 year old child’s wall. That sort of production design slapdashing of impossibilities universally annoys me.

  • Bob The Slob

    sean…3 stars…really?

  • Leuccipus

    - The “magic salve” is the placental material extracted for Dr Benson during Klaatu’s birth.

    – G.O.R.T. simply transfigured; like Klaatu, G.O.R.T. is an information-set capable of adopting any form for a particular purpose; he is the seed of the cleansing process.

  • Scott

    I left that “movie” as soon as I finished my nacho’s. Madonna and Ed Wood could have done a much better job.

  • After a solid first 20 minutes I thought the film was just awful.

    chuck

  • At least I’m not the only one who thought it sucked.

  • Bas

    This can not possibly be as bad as The Happening. Still not seeing this in the theater.

  • Goon

    It’s much worse than the Happening.

    You know what the one of the dumbest things about TDTESS is?

    (sort of spoiler)

    The aliens want to protect the earth from humanity, but their method of destroying everything is much much more severe than what humans can/are doing, and would completely ruin nature in the process. hypocrites.

  • Please be forewarned that there are spoilers in this review.

    I have heard critics say that the remake of “The Day the Earth Stood Still” is a disappointment and others say even worse. It is now a controversial film because movie goers shot this one to the number one rating over the weekend. In two days this movie, which cost $80 million to make, earned $70 million domestic and internationally combined.

    If you are an old movie fan and you saw and liked the original hit sci-fi, this one will make you teary-eyed with compassion for mankind and give you the same effects as the first, except far superior. If you’re young and have never seen the original, you should be struck with awe.

    It recreates the original, paying homage to a finely directed 1951 film that still places in the top 30 greatest sci-fi films of all time. This same thing cannot be said of some of the other sci-fi remakes and this movie should not be thrown into that pile of rubbish.

    I thought that this film was edited so beautifully to flow from one scene to the next without in-between garbage that sometimes is enough to disrupt plots to the point that one could lose interest. Sci-fi movies should be made to keep audiences on the edge of their seats, or at least hold the audience captive with special effects. No scene was wasted. Everything that was said had some significant message in it. As one major newspaper put it, the movie gets right to the point and moves on. I didn’t see one person get up and go to the refreshment stand or leave the room after the show began. This, to me, indicates that the audience was under the spell of either the 3D effects or the plot kept them going. For me it was both.

    An object is spotted in space and a trajectory shows it to be on a collision course with the Earth. The Earth has seventy-eight minutes to count down, when suddenly the UFO slows down at count zero and code red goes to yellow as the mother ship releases the smaller ones to circle the globe. This “sphere” or rather I should say “mother ship of many spheres” has now landed in Central Park and is approached by a cautious scientist, Helen Benson, who is played by Oscar nominee (A Beautiful Mind) and Golden Globe winner, Jennifer Connelly. She is the scientist assigned to study the alien species and chosen for the team to make first contact

    An alien comes forth from the foggy mist for first contact and as usual, mankind can’t control his urge to shoot first and ask questions later. Klaatu has brought with him a gigantic robot, and from its first behavior, appears to be only his protector. But the robot, GORT, which is the acronym for Genetically Organized Robotic Technology) is actually a weapon of mass destruction…the terminator of all human life on Earth. The robot is programmed to activate only when there is hostile or aggressive activity or when the emissary is threatened.

    In fact, this is also the nature of Klaatu as well. His destructive nature only activates when threatened. The robot disarms all of Earth’s weapons, sends out an ear drum bursting high pitch and causes everything operational to shut down or to “stand still” while it moves out of the fog toward Helen and the emissary. Unknown to Helen, it leaves something in her possession that can regenerate living tissue, but she isn’t aware of what he is doing until later when it becomes apparent that it is for the alien’s personal medicine cabinet.

    Keanu Reeves, international superstar and earned a Star on Hollywood Walk of Fame, as well as top 10 favorite actors globally, plays Klaatu, the emissary from another galaxy who has been shot down, hauled off to a classified information facility, interrogated, and operated on by a doctor who suddenly is enlightened telepathically on how to extract the bullet. Klaatu has an embryonic type outer skin which will allow him to be born as a human on Earth. The doctor begins to remove this outer skin as it starts to peal away. While in captivity, Klaatu evolves into a human cloned from a mountain climber in India many years before. All of this evolution takes place in a matter of hours.

    Klaatu’s mission is speak to the Earth’s leaders to enlighten them on how to restore a dying Earth, as it will effect their galaxy if it were to come to sudden destruction, but who cares? Homeland Security must obey the orders of the president and those orders are to take the alien into custody and interrogate. The old “take me to your leader,” will not work with a leader who believes he/she speaks on the entire Earth’s behalf.

    The Secretary of Defense, played by Kathy Bates, is trying to find out whatever she can but her boss, the president, lacks diplomacy and compassion for alien life forms or just doesn’t want to listen to anyone else’s advice. Klaatu is put through interrogation but instead of giving answers to his interrogator, he first gives a warning and you can predict the rest as Klaatu would not be here on Earth without some resourceful powers. At any rate, it is now Klaatu who gets answers from the interrogator. Klaatu makes his escape with a little tip from Helen who was supposed to administer a truth serum for this interrogation but administered a saline solution instead, whispering in his ear “RUN!”

    Klaatu hides out in a busy train station and finds himself with the new human feeling called, “hunger.” He is able to manipulate a vending machine to drop a sandwich down for him to eat. He stops to observe humans while he is eating and sees a struggle between two men over a train ticket. Irritated by the arrogance of the man who owns the ticket, he causes him to have a heart attack while his impoverished enemy grabs the ticket and runs. He still has not been able to control his reaction to aggressive behavior so far and his inclinations are to side with the underdog.

    He goes to the bathroom (I’m sure he found this to be a disgusting human habit as well) and realizes that his wound is bleeding and manages to manipulate people to make a call to Helen to get his medicine.

    Helen comes to his rescue but must bring her stepson, Jason who is played by famous actor Will Smith’s son, Jaden Smith, the child star of, “The Pursuit of Happiness.”

    Jason knows aliens have landed because he has been monitoring the TV which depicts the planet in a stage of “standing still” while everyone who can loot continues to do so and the stocks fall to below sea levels.

    When Helen and Jason arrive, she asks Klaatu, if he is our friend. He answers in partial truth by saying that he is a “friend to the Earth.” He asks her to take him to meet someone who turns out to be an alien scout who was planted on Earth seventy years earlier, so it can be determined if man is a species that they can reason with. At this point, Klaatu still lacks emotions of a human being and still resembles the robot that actually is made in their likeness…all reasoning, apart from emotion.

    That’s when the decision is made that the humans on the Earth can’t be reasoned with since Klaatu’s attempt to reach the United Nations has failed. Without the cooperation of some cohesive authority representing the entire Earth, Klaatu is not willing to negotiate with the inferior people of the hierarchy.

    The dialogue between the aliens definitely moved me to sympathy for mankind. “I will not leave Earth,” the alien scout said. “I find that being a human is difficult,” but he went on to say that as he grew near the time for his life to be over, he was happy that he had lived it. He had learned to love the humans. This puzzles Klaatu but his mind is made up.

    Klaatu explains his mission to Helen. He must destroy humankind to preserve the planet Earth as it is one of just a few that is able to sustain life… and we are killing it. He tells Helen, “If the Earth dies, you die. If you die, the Earth survives.”

    Helen pleas with Klaatu to tell us what to do to change things and we will make those changes. Klaatu is persuaded to at least hear her out for the time being. He follows along with her to a scientist, a Noble Peace Prize winner, in hopes that Klaatu will be convinced that man can understand, learn, and develop to something greater than he is right now. Klaatu shuns the scientist’s idea that mankind is moving in a new direction. He shows Klaatu an equation that mathematically proves man to be a species that makes an evolutionary change on the precipice of extinction. Klaatu sees the equation differently.

    Klaatu, still pragmatic and not convinced that those equations are right, asks Helen to take him to the sphere to carry out his mission. Helen’s stepson is brought along due to circumstances beyond her control and Klaatu is exposed to the child’s input on what Klaatu is about to do. Klaatu has, after only a few hours of being human, started to become sensitive to their ideology. Klaatu shuts out their pleas so he can put the wheels in motion and the spheres start gathering male and female of all species of life forms on Earth…except for mankind.

    Meanwhile, The Secretary of Defense has collected data from every surveillance on Earth and found that Klaatu has been collecting species from all over the globe and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what comes next.

    But the chain of command in this situation is already breaking down. The Secretary tries to give time for Helen to change “its” mind, but tells Helen that there isn’t much time left for negotiation. Reminding Helen that she (the Secretary of Defense) is under obligation to report directly to the president, she orders the department of defense to stand down until further orders. But there are others who will stop at nothing to capture Klaatu.

    The military uses a peaceful non-aggressive approach to capture the robot and he’s under study when suddenly he starts to break down into tiny insectoid bots. (Metallic looking locusts would be a good description to people who are not familiar with sci-fi terminology.) With the use of the DMR sound, the insectoids can be heard crawling on the roof of the theatre. Again, special effects are part of the success of a good sci-fi.

    The fugitives from the government now are Klaatu, Helen, and her stepson, Jason. Jason soon discovers Klaatu’s true identity, and out of fear he secretly makes a call on his cell phone and alerts authorities of their location. This hinders the plans of the Secretary of defense taking matters into her own hands to buy Helen some time to persuade the alien that he is wrong about mankind.

    While they are about to get into a car to leave, a police officer points his gun at the three and uses the usual threatening tones for them to freeze, telling Helen to get the child out of the car. Klaatu responds like the robot and interprets this action as violent. He tells them, this will not hurt but just a second. Then he crushes the policeman between the two cars but when he sees the reaction of Helen and Jason he realizes that “death” and “trauma” are both something that humans find to be a very difficult thing to deal with. Klaatu then restores both policeman and his vehicle. He’s still learning what it is like to be human at this point. “It was only my intention to stop him,” he explained.

    Helen can now see Klaatu as a species with a nature similar to that of the robot and she must try to convince him in a logical way to change his mind. “What’s the matter with you? You just killed a man and brought him back to life and what for, you’re going to kill us now?” This begins a breakdown in Klaatu’s logic. His emotions have been sneaking into play.

    Jason starts to see Klaatu a little less menacing, because instead of seeing him as evil he sees his lack of understanding of the human race, but he’s not convinced to trust him yet. Klaatu and Jason are separated from Helen when the authorities come in by helicopter and take Helen first, but Klaatu resists them, using similar powers as the robot.

    Again, like the robot, Klaatu begins to become protective of Jason because of the human side now developing in Klaatu, he is forming a bond. Nevertheless, Klaatu is still determined to move on with his plan. Man and everything that man has built will be consumed by GORT.

    Later Klaatu talks to Helen on a cell phone and it is agreed that Klaatu will take Jason to a cemetery for Helen to reunite with before the final destruction of mankind takes place. Jason suggests this as he has a secret plan of his own by now.

    Meanwhile GORT senses that the elected creatures are already taken into the spheres and it is now time for him to carry out his own mission. Everything has begun. GORT disassembles into trillions of tiny insectoid bots that multiply rapidly. They are to consume human life and anything made or needed by humans for their survival.

    Jason’s plan to meet his mother in the cemetery turns out to be a scheme to get Klaatu to raise his father up from the grave. He thinks Klaatu has this power after seeing Klaatu restore the life of the policeman. Klaatu hears Jason’s plea but he explains to Jason that there were some things that he could not do. He explained that we never really die, but rather we are transformed into something better. Jason’s father has been gone too long.

    Klaatu contemplates the many tombs of the dead military that fought for mankind and he starts to evolve in his own thinking. Helen arrives and Klaatu turns to them and says, “There is a side to humans that I did not see before.” Although Klaatu does not actually say it, the crosses marking the graves of our military means that man is willing to die for man. That makes him a higher form of life than Klaatu had anticipated.

    However, the dye has already been cast for the mass destruction of humans.

    I also saw a lot of points well taken in “The Day the Earth Stood Still” 2008 version that critics overlooked. I did not find it to be one-sided at all. The dialogue gave us a lot of food for thought.

    I saw the pros and cons both exhibited equally for humankind as well as the environmental viewpoints… the loss of our ecosystems from man’s folly

    I have never seen so many critics with bias against politicians and environmentalists who took it out on Fox. I think we should all suck it up and move on from the issues of the last election while trying to be objective about a movie. Give Fox a break. They took old material and made it look very new. Some critics called this film “preachy” and others thought it all translated into a “save the Earth” type movie and ignored a brilliantly laid plot.

    CNN said Jaden Smith was getting a good taste of success in this Fox film.

    It was thought out from start to finish casting Oscar and Golden Globe nominees and winners for some very difficult roles.

    I would like to point out here that in the first movie, the robot was more powerful than the emissary and was a representation of God and all of God’s power to strike down the Earth. In this 21st century movie the theme really doesn’t have a heavy religious allegation. This could be the complaint of those who loved the first. The emissary is higher in the ranks in this movie, than the weapon of mass destruction.

    This movie is entertainment at its best. The producers used two cameras for certain 2D and 3D effects, and this is the first Hollywood movie to be filmed from start to finish for IMAX theatres.

    Children under thirteen should have parental guidance in an IMAX due to the fact that some sci-fi scenes could be interpreted by young children as horrific.

    In a regular theatre or a theatre that has the 3D technology and digital sound that wraps around, other violent scenes can be easily excused by saying it was no more violent than “Hancock,” although the overall tone of the movie was very sobering and serious in content.

    There’s no nudity, sex, or foul language. This movie is very high in altruism and moral ethics. One critic said perhaps this was its downfall. What a shame that films have to have sex, nudity, or foul language to achieve the highest ratings.

  • Thanks for the heads up about the salve. i was taken away with the philosophy and didn’t realize the robot was putting something on the personage of the scientist.

  • Confused

    I have to believe the review two posts above is a joke, the punchline of which is the length gone to to try and convince anyone this is anything but the worst movie of the year.

  • Goon

    This is a movie where the fate of mankind is decided at a McDonalds.

    You will learn more about Windows Vista and World of Warcraft watching this movie than you will about moral ethics.

  • “There’s no nudity, sex, or foul language. This movie is very high in altruism and moral ethics. One critic said perhaps this was its downfall. What a shame that films have to have sex, nudity, or foul language to achieve the highest ratings.

    Lauren, you do realize the overall result was that this movie was weak, forced, cliched to begin with? Playing Devil’s Advocate…at which point would a sex scene or vulgarity would have helped? The plot is poor, it is acted horribly and if you’ve seen the commercial for it, you’ve seen all of the special effects. Why are these movies always in Manhatten?

    Do you realize, its the OTHERS (like these critics) are TELLING us how to feel and think on a subject? I, just tell it like it is…whether someone agrees or not. It is of little matter to me.

  • sashasolaris

    It was Tarkovsky who did “Solaris”. And his best in sci-fi genre is of course “Stalker” – the same old question what we would do when we were to meet aliens and several more.

  • What happened after “The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)”

    -Spoiler Alert!-

    1 Second after Klatu unleashes a massive EMP;
    – There are ten thousand car accidents
    – Fifty thousand people trip and fall in the dark
    – Over a million people log off of the World of Warcraft
    – Over a billion people look annoyed and confused

    5 Minutes after the EMP
    – Four thousand aircraft crash.
    – Ten thousand people run out of air in dark places.

    1 Day after the EMP
    – Each government declares martial law.
    – Ten billion non-electronic mechanical devices are dusted off and put into use.
    – Six billion people start hording food.

    1 Month after the EMP
    – People are still discovering that martial law has been declared
    – A hundred thousand cars are put back into use.
    – Five hundred thousand horses are saddled.
    – A million people succumb to infection.
    – A billion people are suffering from withdrawal.
    – Four billion people do not have enough to eat.
    – Enough food to feed four billion people spoils.

    6 Months after the EMP
    – Global social services have vanished.
    – The human population has been reduced by half, mostly from starvation.
    – Knowledge of WHO killed half the human race has almost circled the globe.

    2 Years after the EMP
    – America finishes constructing the first new nuclear weapon.
    – The first computers are available on the market again.
    – Three major wars are raging.
    – One hundred million light bulbs are produced.

    10 Years after the EMP
    – A day of mourning is declared world wide.
    – “Klatu” is adopted into the English language as a new profanity.
    – New York turns its lights back on.
    – Fifty thousand people log onto the internet, crashing it.

    50 Years after the EMP
    – Greenpeace replaces the UN.
    – The Alien-hate party wins a landslide victory in United North America.
    – The Stock Exchange starts up again.

    100 Years after the EMP
    – The first nanite technology is reverse engineered and duplicated.
    – Every electronic device on Earth, the Moon and Mars is EMP shielded.

    300 Years after the EMP
    – Earth declares war against Klatu’s people.

    301 Years after the EMP
    – A hundred billion aliens look annoyed and confused.
    – Greenpeace prevents a hundred billion alien deaths by provide aid and supplies.
    – The President of Earth tells Klatu that Earth –IS- our planet.

  • Invader897

    I think everyone seems to be exaggerating how bad it was. I agree it was kind of bad, but was it really the worst movie ever as pretty much everyone is saying?

  • Jem

    The movie was not at all that bad. You guys, exaggerate too much.

    For me, the story was meaningful. The essence of the story is to tell the people the reality of what is happening. It may look preachy, but it proves a lot of things.

  • so good

  • i think it’s a good science-fiction film. but i think there is a lack character of helen as a astrobiologist. there’s little correlation between her job and her action to save klaatu.