<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hancock Sequel On The Way?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 06:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-614510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-614510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the frist movie was very well written ,&amp; hope to see a sequel soon. Will Smith has always been amoung my top ten actors ,&amp; fits the part like a glove.
Although a sequel has to be thought out carefully if you want it to be a sucsess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the frist movie was very well written ,&amp; hope to see a sequel soon. Will Smith has always been amoung my top ten actors ,&amp; fits the part like a glove.<br />
Although a sequel has to be thought out carefully if you want it to be a sucsess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alpha</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-501080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alpha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-501080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sincerely hope a sequel comes out. I want to see more adventures play out with the darkly humorous Hancock as the lead role. I think one reason why ppl didnt like this movie is because they were expecting it to follow the recent &#039;spoof movie&#039; trend. despite what you may have been mislead to believe by previews or trailers, you must admit that the movie had a good plotline that successfully combined comedy, drama, and a little romance quite nicely. Cant wait]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sincerely hope a sequel comes out. I want to see more adventures play out with the darkly humorous Hancock as the lead role. I think one reason why ppl didnt like this movie is because they were expecting it to follow the recent &#8216;spoof movie&#8217; trend. despite what you may have been mislead to believe by previews or trailers, you must admit that the movie had a good plotline that successfully combined comedy, drama, and a little romance quite nicely. Cant wait</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany21</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-471673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiffany21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-471673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved the first one! I hope they make a sequel.. I love will smith as a blunt sarcastic funny asshole lol my type of man..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the first one! I hope they make a sequel.. I love will smith as a blunt sarcastic funny asshole lol my type of man..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-469976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-469976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dramatic twist didn&#039;t bother me too much (perhaps that is because this is one of the few cases where I listened to the Film Junk podcast first so I had a warning). 

It would be best to settle on dramedy perhaps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dramatic twist didn&#8217;t bother me too much (perhaps that is because this is one of the few cases where I listened to the Film Junk podcast first so I had a warning). </p>
<p>It would be best to settle on dramedy perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-469881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-469881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had no interest in seeing the first film after the trailers gave away most of the plot... I think I&#039;d ignore a sequel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no interest in seeing the first film after the trailers gave away most of the plot&#8230; I think I&#8217;d ignore a sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yih</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-469817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yih]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-469817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the better question is are they doing this sequel to make more money or to actually to do it right this time?  They wasted an up-and-coming director, and three respected actors on the first hancock]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the better question is are they doing this sequel to make more money or to actually to do it right this time?  They wasted an up-and-coming director, and three respected actors on the first hancock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-469779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-469779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, whatever tone they decide to make the next movie, it should be continuous the whole way through. I think the comedic first half is definitely the way to do it, if you want this movie to stand out. Also they should make it good, which would be nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, whatever tone they decide to make the next movie, it should be continuous the whole way through. I think the comedic first half is definitely the way to do it, if you want this movie to stand out. Also they should make it good, which would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Underlined Steven</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/09/25/hancock-sequel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-469739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Underlined Steven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10562#comment-469739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a second I thought that eagle over his shoulder was his animal spirit, and that I had seen a version sans eagle.  I would watch Hancock again if he had an eagle for a sidekick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a second I thought that eagle over his shoulder was his animal spirit, and that I had seen a version sans eagle.  I would watch Hancock again if he had an eagle for a sidekick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>