Treknobabble #18: How To Become a Trekkie

treknobabble18.jpg

Treknobabble is a continuing series of columns written by uber-Trekkie Reed Farrington in anticipation of the upcoming J.J. Abrams Star Trek movie.

If your knowledge of Star Trek is limited to pointy ears, the phrase “Beam me up, Scotty”, Klingons, and/or the Borg, then I’m going to prepare you for the upcoming Star Trek film.

Perhaps I should take a short diversion to define a Trekkie. (People like labels in order to categorize things. That’s how our minds work.) I know there’s a negative connotation in Star Trek fandom to being called a Trekkie. For the purposes of this article, I’m going to define a Trekkie as someone who appreciates Star Trek and can’t get enough of it.

I must tell you that this is the first Treknobabble article that I’ve completely rewritten after the first attempt, because my first draft was just cruel and unfunny, based on the well-worn stereotypes. Stuff like, first of all, you need to move into your mother’s basement.

You know how it’s only okay for black people to call each other the n-word, but it’s offensive if a non-black person calls a black person the n-word? Well, the same doesn’t apply for geeks, even though the malice behind a non-geek calling someone a “geek” is the same. Black people get more respect than geeks. Geeks can’t get into the cool nightclubs. Imagine life as a black geek. (Yes, they do exist.) A Trekkie calling someone else a “geek” is just pathetic. And I don’t want to be pathetic.

Now let’s pretend that for whatever reason, you want to become a Trekkie. (I know that it takes a huge stretch of the imagination to start with this premise given the stigma attached to being a Trekkie, given that being a Trekkie offers no benefits in the real world.) Where do we begin?

How about intelligence? If you didn’t graduate from high school, should you give up trying to be a Trekkie and instead get a membership with the Star Wars Fan Club? (Someone is going to beat me over the head with his light saber.) One misconception about Star Trek is that you need to have some intelligence in order to understand it. I can guarantee that Stephen Hawking would scratch his head (oh, wait, can Stephen Hawking scratch his own head?) at some of the “treknobabble” used in the later series. The best Star Trek deals with simple ideas and how humans react. We can all relate.

I don’t think it would be hard for someone to understand what Star Trek’s technology does when seeing it for the first time. A transporter gets you from here to there. The Starship Enterprise is like a car with an engine that overheats a lot. A phaser is like a gun that has different settings. A tricorder tells you information such as how many people are around you, even the people you can’t see. A hypospray injects you with medicine without a needle. A replicator makes stuff. The technology hasn’t changed much over all the series. And don’t worry about all the new words. When you see the thing or see what it does, you don’t need to know its name. I think the only new thing since the Original Series is the holodeck. A holodeck is a room that makes you think you’re somewhere else. If you’re asking yourself how that works, you’re starting to become a Trekkie. (How many people actually understand how a television works? I mean, how many people could build a television from scratch?)

But beyond the scientific concepts explored, one also has to contend with the massive historical background that this fictional universe has accumulated over 40 years. In the Original Series, each episode could practically stand alone. So basically you could watch the episodes in any order. Some have attributed the success of Star Trek in syndication to this strategy. What we ended up with were stories heavily driven by plot. Unfortunately, this also meant that the characters wouldn’t change. All of television at the time was structured like this.

Beginning with series like Hill Street Blues, more prime-time television became soap opera like. The later Star Trek series resisted this, but eventually Deep Space Nine (probably in response to Babylon 5) and Enterprise (in response to poor ratings) used story arcs. So it’s probably a good idea to avoid Deep Space Nine and Enterprise episodes for your first taste of Star Trek.

I would think that many people who have seen the movie, Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan, have never seen the Original Series episode “Space Seed” upon which the movie was based. I don’t think it’s necessary to have seen it, but those who have, surely have a better appreciation for the movie. So you don’t have to know the history, but you’ll be missing out on all the nuances that make life worth living.

Star Trek tends to repeat itself a lot. Especially the Original Series. That’s why there are so many catch phrases and peculiarities that people have picked up on. Dr. McCoy says, “He’s dead, Jim,” a lot as well as “I’m a doctor, not a .” People with red shirts on landing parties tend to get killed a lot. Capt. Kirk has his flying drop kick. Capt. Kirk destroys computers by talking them to death. If there’s a woman guest star, then chances are Kirk will lock lips with her. Spock has his “Live Long and Prosper” greeting, and his Vulcan nerve pinch. There are musical themes for jeopardy, fighting, romance, alien worlds, etc. So as you watch more episodes, you will find that it’s quite comforting to adventure with a family of characters on screen.

You might think you don’t have time to try to understand Star Trek before seeing J.J. Abrams’ version. Believe me, despite what Abrams and his cohorts would like you to believe, you will need to understand Star Trek in order to appreciate the movie. And you still have a whole year to catch up! I could even list some of the most popular episodes for you to download or rent. I once thought that if anyone sat down to watch “City on the Edge of Forever,” then he/she would immediately become a fan. But a friend who had seen the episode assured me that he was not a Trekkie. This episode speaks to me, because (SPOILER ALERT!) Kirk has to sacrifice the life of a loved one in order to literally set the world right. And in order to allow the sacrifice to occur, he has to physically hold one of his best friends and prevent him from saving her! It’s not enough to stand idly by.

In the book Living with Star Trek: American Culture and the Star Trek Universe, the author cites a fan letter from someone who got into Star Trek by watching the Next Generation episode, “Pen Pals”, in which an alien girl transmits a message for help that a crew member of the Enterprise intercepts and decides to take action even though he is disobeying the rules of alien contact. The letter writer says, “(the episode) captured my feelings at the time perfectly: a lone voice crying out into the void, desperate for someone to listen to it.” The reason I bring this example up is that I think any episode of Star Trek could potentially make anyone into a Trekkie.

Remember when I said that “being a Trekkie offers no benefits in the real world”? I should say that being a Trekkie does offer happiness when you’re alone. There’s a stereotype of a Trekkie being a non-popular outsider. But poets have always known that each and everyone of us is born alone and dies alone. If you’re feeling sad and lonely one day, then tune in to any episode of any Star Trek series, and you will see people caring for one another as they head out into the unknown. As we orbit the Sun on spaceship Earth, we are all potentially Trekkies.



  • Reed, Did Sean revoke your posting privileges because you were posting too much Treknobabble?

    You figured what to call black people!

    @”Black people get more respect than geeks.”

    Opps!

  • Greg

    Maybe I’m overly sensitive, but I don’t think that’s very politically correct to say.

    “Black people get more respect than geeks.”

    Do you think it’s unfair?

    I have a big problem with parts of this column. It’s offensive.

    “Black geek” – Are you saying that’s a double whammy?

    What the fuck, man?

  • I think Reed Farrington should take a short (2 weeks or so) break from this column. Clearly the masses are turning against him.

    We all know there’s only one man who can step in and take his place. He’s a surely Dane, and his name’s Henrik.

  • It’s funny that in regards to this website, two people are considered ‘the masses’.

    Sounds about right.

  • Reed Farrington

    Rusty, that’s not a bad idea. We could have Henrik as a guest columnist. Sean gave me posting privileges at the beginning, but I’ve always let Sean post Treknobabble despite it sometimes saying that Reed posted it.

    Greg, Jay already told me that he didn’t quite understand my argument and that I was perhaps being insensitive. He made the point that it’s not like Trekkies get pulled over every day and hassled. Clearly, Sean made the right move in censoring me, because I had originally spelled out the n-word in my article. I wonder if I should invoke the well-worn excuse that I’ve had friends who were black.

    I’m not much for political correctness, but at the same time, I try not to offend. Hell, I can’t even write the word sh*t!

    I am guilty of trying to create controversy or go for a laugh sometimes at another race’s expense, even my own race. For that, I apologize.

  • Greg: You’re being oversensitive.

    Reed: Your paragraph didn’t make any sense. Leave the humourous racial commentary to Chris Rock.

  • Reed Farrington

    Sean, would you line up Chris Rock to do a guest column for Treknobabble, please?

    People have always told me that I should lay off any attempts at humour whatsoever.

  • Danno

    Reed,

    You are 100% correct in your comparison of geeks and “black people”. I thought i was the only one that felt that way. Geeks have it soooo bad. We’re constantly made fun of for dressing up like Spock oh goodness gracious me!

    You sir are a retard.

  • Diggity

    The worst part of being a geek was when they kidnapped you sold you into slavery and worked you to death.

    You sir are a racist and a geek and retarded

  • Diggity

    “Imagine life as a black geek” are you saying that the only thing worse than being a geek is being a black geek?

    Idiot

  • Reed Farrington

    FYI people, Danno knows me personally. For support, I was going to solicit responses from people who know me personally, but with Danno’s response, I’ve changed my mind.

    Believe me, I was trying to be funny, not racist. After dealing with people who’ve been racist towards me for my Asian heritage, I’d rather be a retard than a racist.

    Wait, “retard” is politically incorrect, isn’t it?

    I need an image consultant or damage repair publicist. Maybe I should hang out with Mel Gibson.

  • I guess that’s what happens when you ask your friends to support you in your comments section.

    It’s tough finding good help. Especially for a geek. :P

  • Danno

    Haha, i knew you were gonna say that. At the risk of comparing retards to idiots, I’m just gonna call you an idiot. Is that better? Actually, you make a good point. I know some mentally handicapped people that are way cooler than you.

  • Reed Farrington

    FYI people, Diggity does not know me personally. At least, I don’t think he does.

    OK, people, let me have it. I deserve it.

    Oh, I’ve just been informed that Diggity does know me.

  • Reed is Film Junk’s Larry David. (Here I thought I was Film Junk’s Larry David.)

    He was just trying to be affable. He went overboard in his affability.

  • Diggity

    Just lighting fires brother Burn baby burn

  • Diggity

    This is the most fun I’ve had in weeks

  • Diggity

    And your replies are priceless

  • Diggity

    And whats with the name “Reed Farrington” at least my Avitar is short and cool yours is long and geeky

  • ProjectGenesisGangster

    I think this is all a set-up. Obviously stories of awkward, borderline creepy encounters in the mid-90’s wasn’t getting the talkback Jay and Sean like to see. So they loosened up a bit in the ‘editing’ of this article to let Reed be Reed and look, people are talking.

  • Reed: I think it’s best we go with ProjectGenesisGangster’s explanation on this one.

  • Greg

    I’ve decided that I’m not being overly sensitive.

    I’ve also decided that Reed is not a racist.

    Reed…I think you were very careless and chose your words poorly. It doesn’t matter that you were trying to be funny.

    Try actually talking about Star Trek in your next column.

  • …says the guy who writes movie reviews that are 75% about the meal beforehand!

    Perhaps I should have censored Reed more. But you know… censorship sucks.

    Hey Reed, this actually reminded me of an idea for one of your next columns. You should do a top 5 favourite episodes, or top 5 episodes to watch to get you into Star Trek.

  • Greg

    Yeah, but when I talk about the meal, I don’t compare the steak and mashed potatoes to Hitler and the Jewish in a ridiculously insensitive comment.

    I’m not saying what Reed said was as straight forward and insane as that….but you get my point.

    Furthermore…if you don’t like the way I write…don’t post it. Simple as that, broseph.

  • BlackerThanDiggity

    Am I the only one sick of white people identifying others as racists like some sort of brand name? Is it the white guilt that provides such moral authority?

    I agree with Greg, Reed was just careless in trying to express his point.

    Also, people use labels, either to themselves or others, as a means of social identity and a source of false individuality. Labelling someone else a “Trekkie” provides me a sense of my own worth by sidestepping my imagined negative connotations of being a “Trekkie”. I purposefully exaggerate the differences to distance myself from one group and find solace in another. I do this because this is how i make sense of the world.

  • ProjectGenesisGangster

    Lieutenant Farrington: How many have paid the price for your impatience? How many have died? How much damage have you done, and what is yet to come?

  • ProjectGenesisGangster

    Lieutenant Farrington: I have no knowledge.
    Cheel: Then I hope pain’s something you enjoy.

  • @ projectGenesisGangster

    good point on RF’s last column. This may actually be the less offensive of the two.

    I would’ve commented last time, but I was too busy avoiding eye contact.

    Bring on Henrik.

  • swarez

    I see nothing wrong with Reeds words. Some people just are overly sensitive for some strange reason and feel the need to “correct” others for saying something that they don’t have the balls to say.
    How is this racist? And which group is being targeted? Black people or geeks?

  • Danno

    Maybe Reed should be forced to do a movie review for Paul Haggis’ Crash. LOL

    Reed is a good guy and I will say that I was surprised and somewhat shocked by his comments only because it seemed very out of character for him to write that.

    Also i think it should be noted that it would be somewhat strange for a Trekkie to be racist because everyone knows that Star Trek is all about finding hot alien women for Captain Kirk so he can make out with them on the show.

  • Diggity

    I have to agree with Danno, hi Danno, Reed is a good guy, Hey Reed and a great first baseman,
    I just like to bust balls, and being a Trekkie, though somewhat reformed, the original show was more about testing penicilin against space VD than space exploration. Oh and a star destroyer could wipe the floor with the enterprise, hi Trekkies.

  • fizzle

    i agree with cheel, re-reading that paragraph makes you realize that it makes no sense. Maybe Reed saw some stand up comedy the night before and wanted to work it in to his article, it definetly didn’t work. I think you should build a TV from scratch to win the people back.

  • Reed Farrington

    Yes, I agree that paragraph was poorly constructed and missing some connective sentences. You could say there are contradictory thoughts being expressed at the same time. I’m tempted to dissect that paragraph, but I’m afraid of being “misunderstood” only further.

    Greg, thx for your follow-up post. I agree with you.

    Yes, I understand I was racist in the sense of perpetuating stereotypes. I was being satirical, but I fell into the trap where written words do not convey the intent behind them. But I am not racist in the sense of judging someone by the colour of his or her skin.

    When I mentioned to Jay that Sean had replaced my spelling out of the n-word, I offhandedly brought up the song “Woman is the (n-word) of the World” by John Lennon as a defense. And then Jay accuses me of placing myself in the same artistic league with John Lennon. I’m reminded of the uproar caused by the misconstruing of Lennon’s words in comparing The Beatles to Jesus. Oops, there I go again, comparing myself to Lennon. And I probably offended women and religious people, too.

    I think Sean will have to put up a disclaimer in front of all my Treknobabbles to say that the ideas expressed in it do not reflect the opinions of FilmJunk. :-)

  • Reed Farrington

    Oh, BTW, Danno and Diggity don’t really know me that well, but I appreciate their support.

    Makes me think of the cases where someone does something bad, and the next door neighbours get interviewed saying, “He seemed like such a nice guy.” :-)

  • “I guess that’s what happens when you ask your friends to support you in your comments section.”

    Classic.

    “Maybe Reed should be forced to do a movie review for Paul Haggis’ Crash.”

    Amazing.

    This comments section is off the hook. I definitely didn’t see anything racist with the comments uttered in the article, but I’m not very conscious of offending people, I do it without intent pratically on a daily basis. I’ve even gotten censored when I called into the FilmJunk live show once, and my faux-pas actually ended up generating some funny content from Jay, with him laughing! So they go out of their way to keep FilmJunk clean.

    ““Black people get more respect than geeks.””

    Am I the only one who thinks it’s funny? I guess me and Reed does share some things.

    And for all you fans out there, I have been a guest columnist for FilmJunk! Just do a search and you’ll find some stuff. If it’s Star Trek you’re in need of, I have not written anything on FilmJunk (though co-writing a Treknobabble would be an honor), but I have written an extremely eloquent and convincing post about why ST:TNG is amazing, which can be found at my gasping-for-breath personal blog, HERE:http://no-kids.blogspot.com/2007/06/reasons-why-you-should-appreciate-star.html

    Enjoy!

  • In regards to offending people, I’ll say that I love me some good negro jokes, gay jokes or lesbian jokes or asian jokes or student jokes or scottish jokes etc. I think stereotypes are hilarious. I just think it gets problematic if it’s coming from somebody you don’t know, clearly the jokes are only funny when you know they’re meant as jokes. I guess it all depends on wether or not you have some suspicion that Reed may actually be a racist and that taints his choice of words, but for me, I don’t see any problem with having fun with stereotypes, and people need to get over themselves if they take offense.

    What happens when a Jew walks into a wall with an erect cock?

    He hurts his nose!

  • It must be great having Henrik on your side Reed.

  • Diggity

    LOL a guy named Henrik making fun of Jews,LOL
    THIS IS THE BEST TREKNOBABBLE POST EVER!!

  • Glendon

    An audio version of this post and comments should have been included in the Film Junk clip show.

  • I hope I don’t have to go explaining myself again. I wonder how many people still think I’m racist.

    One thing I’ve wondered is that I don’t think I have many (any?) Asian fans. (Maybe it’s Film Junk’s fault.) I don’t seem to appeal to my own demographic.