Treknobabble #4: Has J.J.Abrams Watched Star Trek: Enterprise?

treknobabbleenterprise.jpg

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
– George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905

In reading through the recent chat transcripts with the creative team behind Star Trek XI, I am left wondering if J.J.Abrams has watched the Enterprise series. According to Roberto Orci, none of the Star Trek XI creative team have talked to the creative team behind Enterprise including Rick Berman and Brannon Braga. This does not bode well for Star Trek XI. After all, Berman and Braga had to deal with the same issues. Both Enterprise the series and Star Trek XI take place before the Original Series and both attempted (or are attempting) to expand the core audience for Star Trek. Regardless, let me address some of Abrams and Orci’s comments.

Abrams says: “Without comedy (my fave TOS eps had GREAT wit), the audience finds their own places to laugh. And in a world of humans and aliens, that could be disastrous.” So I wonder if Abrams considers the line, “Laugh it up, fur ball,” hilarious. I didn’t think Star Wars was all that comedic even with C3P0 and R2D2 playing at Laurel and Hardy. And it seemed to be okay without it. More often than not, Star Trek falls flat when it attempts humour. I wonder what Abrams fave TOS eps is. The Trouble with Tribbles? (That’s the episode with the tribbles.) (My fave is City on the Edge of Forever (about Kirk sacrificing a woman he has fallen in love with in order to prevent Hitler from winning World War II); I mention this in case you were going to accuse me of being evasive.) I must admit that I found much of the humour in The Voyage Home (about time traveling to get the humpback whales) was effective. The Voyage Home’s large box-office receipts were attributed in large part to the humour because the humour brought in the non-Trekkers. Actually, The Voyage Home is the only movie that I’ve paid twice to see at a theatre. (I’m kind of cheap, so this is sort of a big deal.)

I found this response by Robert Orci, Co-Writer/Executive Producer for Star Trek XI, kind of pretentious: “We not only went back to our favorite episodes and books and movies, but we also read graduate level dissertations about the meaning of Star Trek.” I think his attitude is commendable, but if his answer is meant to reassure Trekkers that he knows what he’s doing, then I can only respond with a quote from Scotty (although I realize Scotty didn’t originate this saying): “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” I had such high hopes for Star Trek Nemesis because of things I had read about the writer John Logan. Things like how he was a Trekker and how much he loved the Original Series. And how he was writing scripts for Spielberg and Scorsese. Well, the final product speaks for itself. (And if you’re going to tell me that you loved Nemesis, then you might as well stop reading because we’re worlds apart. I kid, of course. About not reading further. I do hate Nemesis.)

Abrams says with regards to visual FX: “…my goal is to make Trek REAL — that is to say, not have it be camp — not have it be phony — not have it look like a scrap of green screen was used anywhere.” I’ve always wondered if the charm of the Original Series was the phoniness (and of course, the Shatnerian emoting style). I mean if you take away the papier-mâché rocks, the obvious matte paintings, the sliding panels used in engineering to simulate moving status indicators, the vivid wall colours, the blue eye shadow, the obvious stunt doubles, the hand-animated weapon effects, the softly-lit females, the pajama style uniforms, the re-use of the same ship flying shots over and over again, the swarthy-bearded human-like alien Klingons, um… oh, I seem to have run out of things to make fun of. Yeah, so after you fix all these things up, will you finally have something that appeals to mainstream audiences? (That’s a rhetorical question.)

Abrams says when talking about an Enterprise model: “The Enterprise will be a combo of the physical and the virtual.” There’s something physical about the Enterprise exterior that can’t be created digitally? I thought the problems with fur and hair had been effectively resolved. Maybe not. So the Enterprise has sections covered with fur or hair? Maybe under the nacelle pits. Water is kind of difficult to simulate. Maybe the Enterprise has an outdoor pool. (Yeah, I know. Jay has told me that I don’t have a sense of humour.)

Sorry if I’m taking answers out of context. I just didn’t want to bore you by repeating the questions. Abrams would probably lump me in with The Haters (his words). Maybe I should mention that I love Felicity, Lost, and MI3. So it’s nothing personal. I do have a tendency to not have high hopes in order to avoid disappointment.

Anyway, Roberto Orci said something that I can’t argue with or complain about. Let me give him the final words: “Complaints mean you still care… so we never want to see you stop complaining.” — Reed



  • I think it’s encouraging that JJ hasn’t seen Enterprise.

  • deadpaul

    “And if you’re going to tell me that you loved Nemesis, then you might as well stop reading because we’re worlds apart. I kid, of course.” Come on Jay, that’s a sense of humor. Reed, another good column. I’m not much of a Star Trek fan, but your love of it is infectious. Have you ever considered doing one column in Klingon?, I kid, of course. Live Long and Prosper.

  • Live long and prosper indeed! I too despise Nemesis. But I also dislike Enterprise. At one point a station in Holland where I vacationed at, showed back-to-back episodes of Next Generation and Enterprise. At 1 in the morning no less. So after my parents had gone to bed, and my friend that was on the vacation with us had gone to sleep (he, like many of my friends, couldn’t care less about Star Trek or staying up late), I would sneak up and enjoy myself with cookies, cigarettes and Star Trek. The one evening they showed “Genesis” first – an episode that creeped me out right then and there. I thought it was amazing that a Star Trek episode could be filmed in that way. After that they showed an episode of Enterprise where T’Pol is exposed to a chemical that makes her feel stuff, and the crew of the enterprise go to a foreign ship to find out what the deal is. This totally showed how far Star Trek had fallen to me. Genesis is based on being creepy, suspenseful, not showing what’s going on. Being patient, having enough faith in your story to let it develop around the characters. In the Enterprise episode, where they go to a foreign alien ship mind you, not knowing what they will encounter, within 90 seconds of them entering the ship, they are engaged in lasergun battles, that last for most of the episode. Pure actiondribble, that made my heart bleed for the loss of a loved one. Here is hoping that J.J. Abrams does not go the route of the team behind Star Trek Enterprise – but since he is the creator of Lost and Alias as well as the director of Mission Impossible 3, I am trying so hard to keep my emotions in check.

  • The Middleman

    Enterprise was my favorite of all the Trek series. Abrams would be wise to acknowledge the canon Enterprise set.

  • Reed Farrington

    Whoa, The Middleman. You’re the only person I know in the universe whose favourite of the Star Trek series is Enterprise. You must explain, please.

    Have you sampled all of the other series? (I’ll understand if you skipped the animated series, although I imagine there’s someone out there whose favourite Star Trek series is the animated series.)

    I was starting to enjoy the 4th season, especially the scene with Archer and T’Pol running on the surface of Vulcan.

    I did love the whole premise of Enterprise and admired everything that Berman and Braga tried to do throughout its 4 year run. Unfortunately, Enterprise was all too often boring for me.

    You might say that I was burnt out on Star Trek, but I can still watch reruns of the Original Series without being bored which is kind of strange since I know what’s going to happen.

  • SolesGirlRachel

    I love all Trek, but if I had to choose a fave series, it would be TOS, followed very closely by Enterprise. Enterprise is great! :)

    Reed, I hear you in your above comment re: TOS. I’m the same way, TOS is never boring and I’ve seen them all a zillion times, lol. :) And like you, I too was really loving tuning in each week to Season 4 of Enterprise. A wonderful, all too short a season that I’ll cherish (along with the attached fond memories).

    I was homeless during Season 3, so it was my exciting retreat from reality each week, to tune in and see what would happen with the Xindi, what the Expanse held in store, etc.

    I think we can agree that it’d be a very nice gift to the fans to in some way acknowledge Enterprise in the new movie (it would cost nothing really, and would very much be appreciated). A mention of Archer…a Denobulan redshirt…or (hope against hope) new video footage of the crew or ship later on in their voyage…perhaps while Kirk is watching a briefing re: the Earth-Romulan War or something. I’m going on way too long for a comment here, lol. Hoping the new movie will be good, I like Enterprise. There. :p

    Fondly,
    Rachel :)

  • OMGGIRLTREKKIEWTF

  • Reed Farrington

    Henrik, calm down. You’re going to scare Rachel away! :-)

    Rachel, I love reading long comments as long as the comments don’t ramble on. You made some interesting comments. I never even considered that the new movie would contain any reference to the series Enterprise. I think Enterprise is considered a “failure,” so I doubt whether any future filmed Star Trek will make much reference to the events in Enterprise. I realize each series has its group of devoted fans, but film and television cater to a much larger audience.

  • SolesGirlRachel

    Thanks Reed *hugs, and gives Henrik two CC’s of Sonambutril, Phlox’s sedative of the day, lol*. :)

    [begin rant]
    I agree that Enterprise failed to pull in adequate ratings etc. But for what it’s worth:

    – UPN was never fully available in North America. It’s hard to point to ratings when up to 25 percent of the US can’t even choose to watch the show.

    – UPN underwent tremendous upheaval not too long after Enterprise began (by the 4th season “there wasn’t a single familiar executive left around”, according to Berman and some of the other actors – everyone who had backed the show had left), leaving people like Les Moonves making decisions. This was the guy who turned down the only offer in history from a well-organized viewing public to charitably donate more than $3 million US dollars to UPN, if only to see one more episode. Les said publicly at the time: “I don’t like sci fi” and in a stroke of genius, cancelled Enterprise and replaced it with “Britney & Kevin: Chaotic”. (Sorry, I just threw up a little in my mouth at the mere mention of that, lol.) Britney’s ubber-crap reality show did dismally, even by reality-show standards, despite a massive advertising campaign (Enterprise could’ve used some of that). The largest subway station in Toronto here for example, was actually plastered for more than a month in Britney & Kevin: Chaotic ads – the floors, walls, et al. TV blurbs (i.e. 5 or 10 second “watch Britney!” ads) were so numerous I almost couldn’t believe it. I’d never seen advertising like it before or since. Anyway, UPN died an ignominous death shortly thereafter. Good move, Les.

    – Enterprise was never a money-loser; it just didn’t make *as much* profit as TNG did in its heyday, and small wonder considering the near total lack of advertising & support from its shoddy UPN bosses.

    In the end, despite the obstacles and business turmoils, I have to say Enterprise achieved what it set out to do and then some: to bring us Star Trek in the 22nd century, that was exciting and new. Things like the temporal cold war and the Xindi crisis meant that anything could happen. Events such as the 2 part Mirror Universe eps were a rare, special treat to any Trek fan (the Mirror ENT eps enhanced my appreciation of the related TOS eps). By the way, I remember tuning in to Part 1 with no idea they were gonna do a Mirror show, and being chilled to the core as Zephram did what he did…and in a perverse way, hugely excited to be seeing this dark universe again.

    Was ENT as great as TOS? No, and it’s not a fair comparison. I’d say she’ll be remembered as a fine chapter in the history of Trek though. She’ll be remembered for the controversy & misunderstandings surrounding her, if nothing else. ;) [/end rant]

    I agree with you Reed, it’s unlikely that we’ll see *much* reference to ENT in the films to come. My only point was that a small reference or two (see Comment 6 in this thread) would cost nothing really, would please ENT fans, and wouldn’t detract from the film’s focus or drive away the larger audience. As much as I love ENT, I have to say that I don’t believe it would translate well to the big screen in a film, if only because a larger audience wouldn’t go to see it. Its audience would be a niche, and I would hate to disservice such a fine show by seeing an ENT film draw even worse ratings than the hated Nemesis.

    My apologies for the rant going on so long. I really ought to start a blog one of these days. :p *warm hugs*

    Fondly,
    Rachel :)

  • SolesGirlRachel

    I promise to leave way shorter comments from now on, seriously. :)

  • Rachel, are you currently in a comitted relationship?

  • SolesGirlRachel

    Dear Henrik,

    To answer your question, no, I’m single. :) Only committed to moi. :p

  • Toy

    I wanted to comment and thank the author, good stuff