<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There Will Be Blood Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Longest-Running Movie Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 05:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cronenfly</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/comment-page-1/#comment-363175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cronenfly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/#comment-363175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the film was very kubrickian in terms of cinematography and character themes. The long patient shots corresponding with Jonny Greenwood&#039;s tense and dreadful score. Quite possibly the most captivating film i have ever seen. I really enjoyed this film...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the film was very kubrickian in terms of cinematography and character themes. The long patient shots corresponding with Jonny Greenwood&#8217;s tense and dreadful score. Quite possibly the most captivating film i have ever seen. I really enjoyed this film&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/comment-page-1/#comment-307439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/#comment-307439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;HeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the only one who will give Javier Bardem a run for his money at the Academy Awards this year.&quot;

I&#039;m realizing that maybe this statement is null and void, considering that the Golden Globes had Bardem in the supporting actor category. Am I the only one who finds that weird?

Oh, and it was busy at the screening I saw too, although I think it&#039;s just been in so few theatres up until this point that people are travelling far out of their way to see it (like we did).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;HeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the only one who will give Javier Bardem a run for his money at the Academy Awards this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m realizing that maybe this statement is null and void, considering that the Golden Globes had Bardem in the supporting actor category. Am I the only one who finds that weird?</p>
<p>Oh, and it was busy at the screening I saw too, although I think it&#8217;s just been in so few theatres up until this point that people are travelling far out of their way to see it (like we did).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/comment-page-1/#comment-307435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/#comment-307435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think this is going to be disappearing any time soon. If the local screenings are any sign of what&#039;s going on in other cities, this thing is selling out like hotcakes. They nearly filled the theater at a 2pm Saturday screening!

&quot;HeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the only one who will give Javier Bardem a run for his money at the Academy Awards this year.&quot; Right on the money here - any other year, Bardem would have taken it but I think it&#039;s fairly safe to say that DL is a shoe-in.

As for the film, I loved every single moment, including the slow pacing and (for some strange reason, I kept thinking back to &quot;Gone With the Wind&quot; - strange) the slightly over-the-top closing performance which led to a conclusion that was both shocking and believable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is going to be disappearing any time soon. If the local screenings are any sign of what&#8217;s going on in other cities, this thing is selling out like hotcakes. They nearly filled the theater at a 2pm Saturday screening!</p>
<p>&#8220;HeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the only one who will give Javier Bardem a run for his money at the Academy Awards this year.&#8221; Right on the money here &#8211; any other year, Bardem would have taken it but I think it&#8217;s fairly safe to say that DL is a shoe-in.</p>
<p>As for the film, I loved every single moment, including the slow pacing and (for some strange reason, I kept thinking back to &#8220;Gone With the Wind&#8221; &#8211; strange) the slightly over-the-top closing performance which led to a conclusion that was both shocking and believable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/comment-page-1/#comment-307325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/#comment-307325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, you&#039;re right, the release plans for the movie mainly hinge on whether or not this movie will sell tickets, and Daniel Day-Lewis isn&#039;t necessarily a bankable star. I was just trying to frame the review with my initial impressions going in (hearing so many great reviews and being frustrated that I couldn&#039;t see it myself), but then kind of understanding afterward that a movie like this isn&#039;t a big crowd pleaser to begin with.

Either way, it seems like it will now be expanding over the next couple of weeks, so we&#039;ll see how it is received.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you&#8217;re right, the release plans for the movie mainly hinge on whether or not this movie will sell tickets, and Daniel Day-Lewis isn&#8217;t necessarily a bankable star. I was just trying to frame the review with my initial impressions going in (hearing so many great reviews and being frustrated that I couldn&#8217;t see it myself), but then kind of understanding afterward that a movie like this isn&#8217;t a big crowd pleaser to begin with.</p>
<p>Either way, it seems like it will now be expanding over the next couple of weeks, so we&#8217;ll see how it is received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/comment-page-1/#comment-307286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/#comment-307286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason this isn&#039;t playing at multiplexes across the continent doesn&#039;t really have anything to do with the quality of the film, whether it can speak to the masses the way other cinematic classics do, or whether or not audiences &quot;deserve&quot; to see it, does it? It seems like a simple case of limiting the release of a smaller Hollywood film because it&#039;s simply *not* going to make hundreds of millions of dollars even if it were to be released at every theatre in North America. This seems like a decision that&#039;s motivated by the bottom line rather than a concerted effort to make sure only cinephiles in large urban centres can see it. 

That said, I do wish it was playing at every theatre on the planet because this is one of the better movies I&#039;ve seen in a while and Daniel Day-Lewis&#039; performance is the best I&#039;ve seen, um, ever. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason this isn&#8217;t playing at multiplexes across the continent doesn&#8217;t really have anything to do with the quality of the film, whether it can speak to the masses the way other cinematic classics do, or whether or not audiences &#8220;deserve&#8221; to see it, does it? It seems like a simple case of limiting the release of a smaller Hollywood film because it&#8217;s simply *not* going to make hundreds of millions of dollars even if it were to be released at every theatre in North America. This seems like a decision that&#8217;s motivated by the bottom line rather than a concerted effort to make sure only cinephiles in large urban centres can see it. </p>
<p>That said, I do wish it was playing at every theatre on the planet because this is one of the better movies I&#8217;ve seen in a while and Daniel Day-Lewis&#8217; performance is the best I&#8217;ve seen, um, ever. <img src="https://filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>https://filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/comment-page-1/#comment-307266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/13/there-will-be-blood-review/#comment-307266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[truly a film that for most people will grow upon them over multiple viewings.  I see where you are coming from in that it is a bit distancing emotionally and unusual with story-structure and score.  

Much like the early Wes Anderson flicks, they take a couple of viewings to get in the right head-space to be sucked into that particular cinematic environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truly a film that for most people will grow upon them over multiple viewings.  I see where you are coming from in that it is a bit distancing emotionally and unusual with story-structure and score.  </p>
<p>Much like the early Wes Anderson flicks, they take a couple of viewings to get in the right head-space to be sucked into that particular cinematic environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>