Land of the Lost Review

Land of the Lost
Directed by: Brad Silberling
Written by: Chris Henchy, Dennis McNicholas
Starring: Will Ferrell, Danny McBride, Anna Friel, Jorma Taccone, Ben Best

landofthelost2

The transition from R to PG-13 is not always an easy one for comedians, particularly ones who base their humour on crass jokes and shock value, but it’s a transition that is necessary in order to become a true A-list Hollywood star. When formerly edgy funnymen turn to family-friendly fare (that’s a lot of f-words), they typically risk alienating their original audience and watering down their act. However, if they can pull off these films without losing their identity and credibility (ahem… Eddie Murphy), they just may have a long and profitable career ahead of them.

Will Ferrell, for his part, has always done a decent job of balancing his career between movies for general audiences (Elf) and the college crowd (Old School, Anchorman). However, he is now dealing with an inevitable backlash due to overexposure, and the prospect of a kid-friendly summer blockbuster based on a campy ’70s TV show does not seem to be garnering him a ton of respect. Still, with Ferrell’s penchant for the bizarre, and Danny McBride (Eastbound & Down, The Foot Fist Way) in a supporting role, is Land of the Lost really as innocent and corny as it might seem?

The original TV show Land of the Lost was created by Sid and Marty Krofft (H.R. Pufnstuf), and like many children’s programs from the ’70s it is known for its low-budget special effects and psychedelic undertones. Will Ferrell stars as Rick Marshall, a quirky scientist who has been exiled from the scientific community due to his study of time warps. When a grad student named Holly Cantrell (Anna Friel) offers to be his research assistant, together they set out in search of a dimensional portal with the help of redneck tour guide Will Stanton (Danny McBride). It isn’t long before they are sucked into a fantastical world where dinosaurs rub shoulders with giant insects, ape men and reptilian humanoids known as Sleestaks. The trio must survive long enough to recover their lost Tachyon amplifier if they hope to return to their own world and prove to Matt Lauer that Rick Marshall was right all along.

While I’m not very familiar with the original show, Land of the Lost seems to maintain a lot of the original concept and characters. That said, this movie is mostly an exercise in absurdity, and it has been entirely repainted as a Will Ferrell vehicle. It reminded me of Starsky & Hutch in the sense that it uses the framework of the original mainly as a set up for laughs (although it’s not as much of a direct parody as Starsky & Hutch was), and there’s also not a ton of action in the movie either.

landofthelost1

Perhaps the biggest surprise is the fact that the movie is pretty edgy for something that is rated PG-13… to the point where I could see some parents being a little upset about it. There is plenty of swearing (although only one whispered F-bomb from what I remember), crude sex jokes, a trippy drug scene, and lots of Danny McBride doing what he does best. Admittedly, it did feel like he had to hold back a lot, but it was still funny. Heck, there was even a somewhat risque ethnic joke that kind of came out of nowhere — certainly not something I would have expected from a movie based on a Saturday morning TV show for kids.

Ferrell plays another oblivious man-child, so if you’re growing tired of that act, you might want to steer clear. Not everything works — there are some scenes that go nowhere, jokes that are repeated too often, and some slapstick stuff that is simply forgettable. Jorma Taccone’s portrayal of the ape man Cha-Ka can be grating at times. Still, I think that fans of Anchorman or Step Brothers will definitely find enough comedy here to make it worth their while.

The look of the movie stays true to the cheap, low budget aesthetic of the TV series, which enhances the goofiness, but also seems like an easy excuse for bad CG work. The Sleestaks are men in rubber suits, while the dinosaurs are computer-generated. Some of the sets use giant, cartoony-looking props, while other backdrops are entirely digital. Perhaps if the art design wasn’t so uninspired, they could have meshed the two together well, but as it is they probably should have committed to one or the other. A lot of people are going to question the $100 million budget, but the bottom line is that the movie was not made to wow us with cutting edge FX anyway.

What I think ultimately holds this movie back from being a classic is the lack of an appropriate director or a solid script. The movie is written by Chris Henchy (Entourage) and Dennis McNicholas (Saturday Night Live), but it feels like Ferrell and McBride are the ones providing all the laughs through performance and improvisation alone. Director Brad Silberling (Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events, Casper) clearly knows his way around a family-oriented fantasy film, but he doesn’t quite know what to do with Will Ferrell’s off-the-wall humour and how to integrate it properly.

Land of the Lost is a movie with an identity crisis of sorts, but I do think there is an audience out there who will appreciate it once they find it. Parents expecting another Elf or perhaps something in the vein of Jumanji will obviously not be impressed, but fans of Will Ferrell’s other work should be able to dig it, assuming they can get past the campiness and questionable special effects. Unfortunately it looks like this will go down on record as a Will Ferrell bomb, but I don’t think it deserves to be viewed as such. It’s certainly not his finest work to date, but it’s also a far cry from Semi-Pro. — Sean

SCORE: 2.5 stars



Recommended If You Like: Zoolander, Hot Rod, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Around the Web:



  • Goon

    agree with just about every word in this review.

  • http://www.catharticentertainment.com rus in chicago

    “What I think ultimately holds this movie back from being a classic is the lack of an appropriate director or a solid script.”

    -really, you think?!

    sorry Sean I couldn’t resist. Man you have been kicking ass with getting these reviews out – you have to be getting worn out. Get Wintle on the case!

  • http://www.seandwyer.net Sean

    I do think!

    Yeah, reviews can be draining. Wintle has left to pursue some other stuff right now so unfortunately he isn’t able to pick up the slack.

  • http://www.catharticentertainment.com rus in chicago

    F wintle, he’s dead to me now.. ;)

  • http://hhh.com Shut-Up Ed

    F Jackie.

  • http://entertainmenttodayandbeyond.com entertainmenttodayandbeyond

    At the end of the day its a waste of a 100 Million dollars. This film will have an appeal to some, mostly people who watch it really high. It actually has that type of appeal but as far as Universal is concerned its a disater. While the original 70′s TV show was intentially campy they did use writers who understood sci-fi. I agree with you on Starsky and Hutch. I hate that film because that show was not a comedy, so why turn it into one for a feature film. I really believe this material could have been played straight. When I was watching it I couldn’t help asking myself why Ferrell was playing Marshall. It was more a movie with Will Ferrell in it that a Will Ferrell movie. I honestly wanted to like it but at the end of the day couldn’t. A t-rex and Will Ferrell don’t belong in the same film. In some ways this generations Howard the Duck. 3 out of 10.

    Chuck

  • Rod Munch

    I took my 7 year old son and 10 year old daughter to see this yesterday. Half way though the film my son whispered to me “This film is more like an M than a PG Daddy”. I would have to agree with him.
    Did laugh though when Danny McBride told Anna Freil that she should sit on top of the vibrating monolith.
    (BTW – M is the next rating up from PG in Australia)

  • http://www.aol.com Joe

    I believe the movie was funny at parts, but it definately should be a M movie lol. But other than that I want everyone.

  • dave

    Wow, I grew up watching land of the lost and remember it well as it was one of my favorites as a child. The only thing this movie had in common was the names of the major charactors and the sleestack. For those who do remember the campy charm of the old series it was the story of a family who was lost and trying to survive while they tried to get home. I was majorly disappointed in the lack of story, and Sid and Marty Croft magic in this film. I went knowing it wouldn’t be the same as the show and kept an open mind throughout the show (or tried to) but in essence it was a sad attempt at recapturing the magic of the origional. This film was hey we got Will Ferrell lets build a script to showcase his humor. The movie had great potential that was squashed by the poor script and bad choices. If they are going to remake a classic then stay with the concepts of the classic. Yes we who know the show have seen it done, but bring it unsullied to the kids today who now more than ever need to get entertainment that is more wholesome.

  • joe

    this movie had its funyness, but it was way too crude

css.php